The Law Mind

INDORSER

5 definitions found across Law Mind sources

See encyclopedia: Negotiable Instruments -- Liability of Parties (Maker, Drawer, Indorser, Acceptor) →
INDORSERAuthored
The Law Mind • 1075 words
Definition
An indorser is a person who indorses a negotiable instrument — that is, who, as the payee or holder of a bill of exchange, promissory note, check, or other negotiable paper, writes their name on the back of that instrument, thereby transferring it and assuming a conditional liability for its payment. By the act of indorsement, the indorser makes a secondary promise to the holder: if the instrument is properly presented to the primary obligor (the maker or drawee), payment is dishonored, and the indorser receives timely notice of that dishonor, the indorser becomes personally liable for the full amount of the instrument. The indorser's liability is therefore conditional on the holder's compliance with these procedural steps — presentment, dishonor, and notice. An indorser may qualify or limit this default liability. A conditional indorsement restricts the circumstances under which the indorser is obligated. A restrictive indorsement (such as "for collection" or "for deposit only") limits further negotiation or specifies the purpose for which the instrument is transferred. An indorsement "without recourse" (a qualified indorsement) disclaims the indorser's secondary liability entirely, passing the instrument without personal guaranty of payment.
Common Language
Modern common usage (Wiktionary): Alternative form of endorser. Historical common usage (Webster's 1913): [No independent entry; subsumed under "endorser" — one who endorses.] The spelling variation between "indorser" and "endorser" is largely historical. Legal instruments and older commercial law texts preferred "indorse" and "indorser"; modern practice and the Uniform Commercial Code use "endorse" and "endorser." The legal meaning is identical under both spellings. Researchers reading pre-twentieth-century legal materials will almost exclusively encounter the "ind-" spelling.
Common Confusion
INDORSER VS. MAKER VS. GUARANTOR The maker of a promissory note is primarily and unconditionally liable — no presentment or notice is required to hold the maker. The indorser is only secondarily liable and can be discharged by the holder's failure to present the instrument properly or give timely notice of dishonor. A guarantor's liability arises from a separate contract of guaranty and does not depend on the mechanics of negotiable instruments law. In historical sources, these distinctions were not always drawn with precision, and "indorser" was sometimes loosely used for anyone secondarily responsible for a debt instrument.
Recognized Forms
/SUBTYPES General indorser: Signs without restriction; assumes full secondary liability upon dishonor, presentment, and notice. Qualified indorser: Indorses "without recourse," disclaiming personal liability for payment. Passes title without guaranty. Conditional indorser: Attaches a condition to the indorsement; liability arises only if the condition is met. Restrictive indorser: Uses language such as "for collection" or "for deposit only," limiting further negotiation and signaling a specific purpose for transfer. Anomalous (accommodation) indorser: Signs an instrument not as a party in the chain of title but to lend creditworthiness, typically as a surety for another party.
Why It Matters in Research
Researchers working in commercial law, banking history, or negotiable instruments cases will encounter "indorser" throughout pre-UCC materials — in pleadings, opinions, and treatises from the seventeenth century through the mid-twentieth. Several navigational points are critical. The procedural requirements protecting the indorser — presentment, dishonor, and notice — were heavily litigated in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. Historical case law frequently turns on whether a holder properly preserved recourse against an indorser. A holder who failed to present on time or gave untimely notice of dishonor might find the indorser discharged entirely, leaving the holder with no recourse. Bouvier's reference to the "for collection" indorsement and the federal circuit court decisions reflects a significant body of litigation over whether restrictive indorsements limited an indorser's liability or merely specified the agent relationship for collection. The spelling shift from "indorser" to "endorser" tracks the adoption of the Negotiable Instruments Law (NIL) in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries and then the Uniform Commercial Code after mid-century. Corpus searches must account for both spellings. Pre-NIL materials will use "indorse" almost universally; post-UCC materials predominantly use "endorse." Jurisdictional variation in how courts treated the notice requirement and the effect of conditional or restrictive indorsements was substantial before uniform acts rationalized the rules. Bouvier's citations to New York, Missouri, Minnesota, and federal circuit courts reflect genuine disagreement among jurisdictions that a researcher must not flatten.
Historical Dictionary Support
Black's Law Dictionary (both first and second editions) defines the term concisely: the indorser is the payee or holder who writes their name on the back of a bill of exchange or similar instrument. The definition is functional and minimal, saying nothing about the conditional nature of the indorser's liability or the procedural conditions precedent to enforcement — a significant gap for practical research. Bouvier's Law Dictionary is substantially richer. It identifies the indorser's secondary liability and specifies the three conditions the holder must satisfy — legal demand on the payer, dishonor, and proper notice to the indorser — before the indorser's obligation matures. Bouvier's also acknowledges the permissibility of conditional indorsements. The fragments preserved in the source material reference an established body of case law in New York, Missouri, Minnesota, and the federal courts concerning the "for collection" indorsement, reflecting how actively courts were working out the contours of restrictive indorser liability in the late nineteenth century. All three historical dictionaries treat "indorser" as a self-contained commercial law term, with no effort to distinguish it from common parlance. None addresses the accommodation or anomalous indorser, which appears primarily in treatise literature and case law rather than dictionary definitions.
Jurisdictional Note
Before uniform acts, the duties owed to an indorser and the consequences of defective presentment or notice varied considerably across American states. The Negotiable Instruments Law, adopted by most states between roughly 1896 and 1924, standardized these rules significantly. The Uniform Commercial Code (Article 3) further refined them, adopting the "endorser" spelling and modifying some notice requirements. Researchers must identify which regime governed the transaction at issue.
Encyclopedia Cross-Reference
Negotiable Instruments — Negotiation, Indorsement, and Transfer (The Law Mind Contracts & Commercial Law Encyclopedia) Negotiable Instruments — Liability of Parties (Maker, Drawer, Indorser, Acceptor) (The Law Mind Contracts & Commercial Law Encyclopedia)
Related Terms
accommodation indorserbill of exchangeblank indorsementconditional indorsementdishonordraweedrawerendorserholderholder in due courseindorsementmakernegotiable instrumentnegotiationnotice of dishonorpresentmentpromissory notequalified indorsementrestrictive indorsementsecondary liabilitysuretywithout recourse
INDORSERmain
Black's Law Dictionary • 1891
He who indorses; i. e., being the payee or holder, writes his name on the back of a bill of exchange, etc.
INDORSERmain
Black's Law Dictionary (2nd Ed.) • 1910
He who indorses; 4. ¢., being the payee or holder, writes his name on the back of a bil] of exchange, ete. ..:
INDORSERmain
Bouvier's Law Dictionary • 1928
is fully established in New York and some other states and in the Federal circuit court; 45 Fed. Rep. 337; 70 id. 232; 129 N. Y. 647; 70 Mo. 643; 90 Hun 285; 62 N. W. Rep. (Minn.) 327; 17 S. W. Rep. (Mo.) 982; and the basic principle of these decisions was already approved by the United States su- preme court, which held that "the words for collection' evidently had a meaning. That meaning was intended to limit the ef- fect which would have been given to the indorsement without them, and warned the party that, contrary to the purpose of a general or blank indorsement, this was not intended to transfer the ownership of the note or its proceeds." 1 Wall. 166, 178; which was followed in a case of indorse- ment "for collection"; 148 U. S. 50; and as to an indorsement "for account," it was said, "It does not purport to transfer the title of the paper, or the ownership of the money when received; " 102 U. S. 658. In one state the contrary view has been taken and the bank of deposit of a draft with a forged indorsement, although a mere "in- dorsee for collection," was held liable to refund to its correspondent bank which had paid the money; 8 Colo. 49. See 64 Fed. Rep. 703. The resuit of the decisions cited was the general adoption of a rule by most of the clearing-house associations, substantially like that of New York, excluding, from the exchanges, paper having a qualified or re- stricted indorsement, such as "for collec- tion" or "for account of," unless the same was guaranteed. In Chicago such paper was absolutely excluded. The result has been to make the question, what is a restric- tive indorsement, one of vital importance and the judicial opinion is not uniform. The following have been held to be restric- tive: "for collection; " 1 Wall. 166, 173; 26 Md. 520; "for account;" 102 U. S. 658; "for my use;" 5 Mass. 543; "credit my account; " 1 Bond 387; "Pay to P. or or- der only;" 4 Call. 411; "for deposit; " 50 Fed, Rep. 647 (contra, 77 Ala. 168); "for deposit to the credit of;" 87 Ga. 45; contra (by a divided court), 79 Md. 192; but while the presumption is that it is restrictive, the bank may show by extrinsic evidence that it was not so, either by reason of a special agreement; 50 Fed. Rep. 647; or because the proceeds were passed to the depositor's credit and subject to check before collec- tion; 89 Ga. 108. Where a bank to which a forged check was sent for collection credited the person send- ing it with the amount, without actually remitting the money, it could, on discover- ing the forgery, charge back the amount; 15 So. Rep. (Ala.) 440. See articles criti- cally reviewing the cases, in the latter of which the conclusion is reached that an in- dorsement for deposit is restrictive; 18 Banking L. J. 361, 429; and see also Norton, Bills & N. 123; Daniel, Neg. Instr. §§ 636-7, 698. See GUARANTY; BILLS OF EXCHANGE ; PROMISSORY NOTES; NEGOTIABILITY. In Criminal Law. An entry made upon the back of a writ or warrant. When a warrant for the arrest of a per- son charged with a crime has been issued by a justice of the peace of one county, which is to be executed in another county, it is necessary, in some states, that it should be indorsed by a justice of the county where it is to be executed: this indorsement is called backing. See IN FULL.
indorsernoun
Wiktionary (English) • 2026
Wiktionary contributors • CC BY-SA 4.0 • via Kaikki
Extracted and formatted for display by Law Mind. Source link opens the current Wiktionary page and its contributor history; it is not a frozen copy of this extract.
Alternative form of endorser.

Explore the full Law Mind legal research platform.

SubscribeEncyclopediaSign In