Professional / VIDEO GUIDE
Jurisdiction Compare
Investigate how a legal issue differs across selected jurisdictions.
Video playback is unavailable. Open the video directly or read the transcript below.
Where to find it Workspace → Jurisdiction Compare
Recorded September 10, 2026. Edited from genuine product captures, with slow zooms and time to read. Research waiting is omitted. The interface and available material may change.
What you’ll learn
- 01
Compare jurisdictions
Jurisdiction Compare places research for two to four selected jurisdictions side by side.
- 02
Ask one focused question
Choose the jurisdictions and enter the issue. This example selects California and Montana for a contract-formation question.
- 03
Read each result separately
The actual run found Montana material but did not retrieve suitable California authority. The California gap remains visible here.
The California side of this recorded run could not answer from its retrieved sources. The gap is preserved in the video. Statements in generated text about what the entire library lacks should be treated as limitations of the retrieved evidence, not a collection-wide inventory finding.
Read the full transcript 4 captions
Select any caption to jump to that moment.
Download captions