(a) Reconsideration of Non-Dispositive Matters [28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A)].
A party may seek reconsideration of a magistrate judge's order determining a non-
dispositive matter within fourteen (14) days after service of the magistrate judge's order. The
request for reconsideration shall specifically designate the order, or part thereof, objected to
and the basis for any objection. Any response thereto shall be filed within fourteen (14) days
after service of the request for reconsideration. The district judge assigned to the case will
reconsider the matter and set aside any portion of the magistrate judge's order found to be
clearly erroneous or contrary to law. A request for reconsideration, response and reply, if any,
shall be subject to the page limitations imposed on non-dispositive matters under Local Rule
7.1(b)(1)(C) and (D).
(b) Review of Proposed Findings and Recommendations [28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B)].
A party may object to a magistrate judge's proposed findings and recommendations on
any matter referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) within fourteen (14) days after service
of the magistrate judge’s proposed findings and recommendations. Any objections shall
specifically identify the portions of the proposed findings and recommendations to which
objections are made and the basis for such objections. The district judge assigned to the case
will conduct a de novo review of the objections in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Any
objections, response and reply, if any, shall be subject to the page limitations imposed on
dispositive matters under Local Rule 7.1(b)(2)(B) and (C).
(c) Special Master Reports [28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(2)].
Any party may seek review of, or action on, a special master report filed by a magistrate
judge, in accordance with the provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 53(f). A request for review or action,
response and reply, if any, shall be subject to the page limitations imposed on dispositive
matters under Local Rule 7.1(b)(2)(B) and (C).
55 January 2022
IX. DISTRICT COURTS AND CLERKS
