The Law Mind

Order in Re: Petitions For Application of Retroactive 2023 Criminal History Amendments to the Sentencing Guidelines

E.D. Va. Standing Order — Order in Re: Petitions For Application of Retroactive 2023 C

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINS Norfolk & Newport News Divisions I ILED IN RE: PETITIONS FOR APPLICATION OF RETROACTIVE 2023 CRIMINAL HISTORY NOV 1 4 2023 AMENDMENTS TO THE SENTENCING GUIDELINES CLhHK. U.S. DISIHICTCOUrT NORFOLK, VA STANDING ORDER Under the Criminal Justice Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(a) (1) & (c), and 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) (1), the Office of the Federal Public Defender for the Eastern District of Virginia is hereby appointed to represent any defendant in cases assigned to Judges Davis, Allen, Hanes, Walker, Smith and Jackson in the Norfolk or Newport News Division who was previously determined to have been entitled to appointment of counsel. or who is now indigent. to determine whether that defendant may qualify to seek reduction of sentence and to seek relief in accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2) based on the retroactive 2023 Criminal History Amendments to the Sentencing Guidelines as set forth in Part A of Amendment 821 (Status Points under § 4A1.1) and Part B of Amendment 821 (Zero- Point Offenders). The United States Probation Office for the Eastern District of Virginia and the United States Clerk's Office for the Eastern District of Virginia may disclose Presentence Investigation Reports, Judgments in a Criminal Case, including sealed Judgments, Statements of Reasons, Motions for Departure based on Substantial Assistance, under seal documents pertinent to sentencing, and other documents to counsel as necessary for the Federal Public Defender's Office to determine whether particular defendants are eligible for a sentence reduction under the retroactive amendments, and to determine whether a conflict exists that would preclude the Federal Public Defender from representing a defendant. Should the Federal Public Defender determine that a prohibitive conflict exists in which the prospective client's interests are materially adverse to those of a current or former client. the Court shall be notified and the Court may appoint a member of the Criminal Justice Act Panel of this District to represent the affected defendant. Entered this M'^^day of November, 2023. Mark S. Davis, Chief Arenda Wright Allen United States District Judge United States District Judge /s/ /s/ Elizabeth W. Hanes Jamar K. Walker United States District Judge United States District Judge /s/ mi / iLi Rebecca Beach Smith Raymond A. Jackson Senior United States District Senior United States District Judge Judge 2
Official source: https://www.vaed.uscourts.gov/sites/vaed/files/Standing%20Order%20-%20Amendment%20821%20No · retrieved 2026-07-23