PROCEDURES FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO DISTRICT JUDGE ADA BROWN
AND STANDING ORDER
These Procedures and Standing Order apply to cases assigned to Judge Ada Brown. These
Procedures are to be used with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules, not as a
substitute for them.
CONTENTS
I. CASE MANAGEMENT PROCEDURES ................................................................................................ 2
II. MOTION PRACTICE ........................................................................................................................... 7
III. NOTICE TO PARTIES ASSERTING FEDERAL JURISDICTION IN DIVERSITY CASES ................ 12
IV. TRIAL PROCEDURES AND VOIR DIRE ........................................................................................... 14
V. CONTACT WITH COURT PERSONNEL ............................................................................................ 15
VI. MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURES .................................................................................................... 16
Revised 25.08.04; Adopted 25.08.08 Page 1 of 16
I. CASE MANAGEMENT PROCEDURES
A. Electronic Filing and Service - Counsel must ensure that all pleadings filed via the
CM/ECF system strictly comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2 and Fed. R. Crim. P. 49.1.
These rules regulate the transmission of private and case sensitive information
through the CM/ECF system.
B. Preliminary Pretrial Conference ("Rule 16 Conference") - Unless a Rule 16 (a)
scheduling conference is set by the Court, Judge Brown will enter a scheduling
order after reviewing the Joint Status Report from the parties as required by the
order requiring attorney conference and Joint Status Report.
1. The Court expects the parties to have meaningfully met and
conferred about evidence and exhibits BEFORE the pretrial
conference. At the pretrial conference, the Court will consider only
the unresolved objections to exhibits and evidence.
C. Criminal Sentencing Proceedings - For sentencing hearings-only 10 family
members and/or friends will be allowed in the courtroom.
D. Rule 26(f) Scheduling Conference - The Court requires the parties to comply, in
person, with the conference requirements of Rule 26(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure. The Court does not require a face-to-face meeting in cases involving
pro se or prisoner litigants.
The parties must discuss at the Rule 26(f) meeting, and include in the Joint Status
Report filed with the court, the matters listed in Rule 26(f) that apply to the case.
In general, the court expects the parties to discuss, address in their Joint Status
Report, and be prepared to review with the court, the topics that are set out below.
1. The nature and basis of the parties’ claims and defenses, and any
threshold issues that need to be resolved, such as jurisdiction or
limitations.
2. The parties’ plan for the discovery needed to obtain the information that
is relevant, not privileged, and proportional to the needs of the case. The
parties are expected to engage in early, ongoing, and meaningful
planning for proportional discovery.
3. Whether discovery can initially be focused or targeted to obtain the
information relevant to the most important issues and available from the
most easily accessible sources. The parties must discuss at the Rule
26(f) Conference what subjects and sources of discovery are both highly
relevant and accessible without undue burden or expense. The parties
must discuss any claims, defenses, motions, issues, or subject areas that
should be the initial focus of discovery, and the sources that are most
Revised 25.08.04; Adopted 25.08.08 Page 2 of 16
likely to yield the most important information on those areas with the
least burden or expense. The parties and the court can use the results of
this initial discovery to guide decisions about further discovery and
other pretrial work.
4. Whether any party has served Rule 34 requests for production at the
Rule 26(f) Conference and, if so, whether there are disputes about them.
5. Whether there are issues or problems in the preservation, retrieval,
review, disclosure, or production of discoverable information.
6. Whether there are issues or problems associated with the burdens or
costs of proposed discovery, or with the benefits the proposed discovery
is expected to provide.
7. Whether there are steps that could reduce or avoid discovery costs.
Examples include:
• focusing initial discovery on the information important to
assessing and evaluating the claims and defenses, available from
readily accessible sources;
• using pattern or routine discovery requests that have been
developed for certain cases, including employment cases
alleging adverse actions and FLSA violations, cases involving
post-disaster first-party property insurance disputes, and cases
involving business-interruption insurance claims.
• stipulating to any undisputed material facts and critical points of
controlling law;
• reducing the complexity or burdens of reviewing for attorney-
client privilege or work-product protection and of creating
privilege logs;
• exchanging basic information about the case without the need
for formal discovery requests and responses; and,
• in cases involving extensive electronic discovery, using
technology to assist in reviewing the information.
8. Whether there are issues specifically relating to the disclosure or
discovery of electronically stored information, including:
• the form or forms in which it should be produced;
Revised 25.08.04; Adopted 25.08.08 Page 3 of 16
• the topics and the period for which discovery will be sought;
• the sources of information or systems likely to contain
information, within a party’s control, that should be searched;
• issues relating to preserving, retrieving, reviewing, disclosing,
or producing electronically stored information;
• issues relating to claims of privilege or protection including—if
the parties agree on a procedure to assert such claims after
production—whether to ask the court to include their agreement
in an order under Federal Rule of Evidence 502(d) or, if no
agreement is reached, whether the court should nonetheless
enter the order; and
• other topics listed below or in Rules 16 and 26(f).
E. The Joint Status Report - The Rule 26(f) meeting is expected to result in the parties
completing the Joint Status Report, using the form that is attached hereto as
Attachment 1. The form may be modified or adapted to the needs of the particular
case.
The parties are to file with the court only one combined Joint Status Report and
proposed Order. Both must be signed by counsel for all parties and by any
unrepresented parties. Counsel for the plaintiff is responsible for filing the Joint
Discovery/Case Management Joint Status Report and the proposed Order with the
court. If the plaintiff is unrepresented, counsel for the represented parties has the
responsibility for filing the Joint Status Report and proposed Order.
If the parties cannot agree on matters that must or should be addressed in the Joint
Status Report or proposed Order, the disagreements must be set out clearly in the
joint filing. The court may discuss the disputes with counsel and attempt to resolve
them at a later Rule 16 Conference.
Contents - The parties must discuss in their Rule 26(f) meeting, and the Report
must include, the pertinent matters listed on the attached forms, including the
following:
1. A brief statement of the claims and defenses;
2. A proposed time limit to file motions for leave to join other parties;
3. A proposed time limit to amend the pleadings;
Revised 25.08.04; Adopted 25.08.08 Page 4 of 16
4. Proposed time limits to file various types of motions, including
dispositive motions (NOTE: The dispositive motion deadline cannot be
less than 90 days before trial; the Court prefers 120 days);
5. A proposed time limit for initial designation of experts;
6. A proposed time limit for responsive designation of experts;
7. A proposed time limit for objections to experts (i.e. Daubert and similar
motions);
8. A proposed plan and schedule for discovery, a statement of the subjects
on which discovery may be needed, a time limit to complete factual
discovery and expert discovery, and a statement of whether discovery
should be conducted in phases or limited to or focused upon particular
issues;
9. What changes should be made in the limitations on discovery imposed
under these rules or by local rule, and what other limitations should be
imposed;
10. Proposed means for disclosure or discovery of electronically stored
information (“ESI”) and a statement of any disputes regarding the
disclosure or discovery of ESI;
11. The depositions that need to be taken, and in what sequence;
12. Any proposals regarding the handling and protection of privileged or
trial-preparation material that should be reflected in a court order;
13. A proposed trial date, estimated number of days required for trial and
whether jury has been demanded;
14. Objections to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1) asserted at the Scheduling
Conference, and other proposed modifications to the timing, form or
requirement for disclosures under Rule 26(a), including a statement as
to when disclosures under Rule 26(a)(1) were made or will be made;
15. Whether the parties will consent to trial (jury or non-jury) before a U.S.
Magistrate Judge;
16. Whether the parties are considering mediation or arbitration to resolve
this litigation and a statement of when it would be most effective (e.g.,
before discovery, after limited discovery, after motions are filed, etc.),
and, if mediation is proposed, the name of any mediator the parties
jointly recommend to mediate the case;
Revised 25.08.04; Adopted 25.08.08 Page 5 of 16
17. Any other proposals regarding scheduling and discovery that the parties
believe will facilitate expeditious and orderly preparation for trial;
18. Whether a conference with the Court is desired; and
19. Any other matters relevant to the status and disposition of this case,
including any other Orders that should be entered by the Court under
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 16(b), 16(c) or 26(c).
F. Scheduling Order - The Judge’s scheduling order imposes deadlines on the
parties. The scheduling order cannot be modified by the parties without leave of
court. The parties must file requests for extensions of time as motions, rather than
as stipulations.
G. Discovery Disputes - Discovery disputes are often, but not always, referred to a
magistrate judge. Other motions are occasionally referred for recommendation.
H. Mediation - Typically, the Judge refers civil cases to mediation unless the parties
indicate, and the Court determines, that mediation would not be fruitful. The parties
are given an opportunity to agree upon a mediator and the Judge will appoint that
mediator to the case. If the parties cannot agree, the Court will select a mediator for
the case.
I. Settlement Discussions - In the Court’s scheduling order, Judge Brown directs the
parties and their respective lead counsel to hold a face-to-face meeting to discuss
settlement of the case.
J. Requests for Hearings or Conferences - Judge Brown will consider written
requests for hearings or conferences with the Court provided they are made after
conferencing with opposing counsel to attempt to reach agreement as to proposed
hearing dates and times. If agreement has not been reached, the party seeking the
hearing or conference should so notify the Court in their written request and copy
opposing counsel with the request.
K. Judge's Copies - The Court does not require courtesy copies of documents, unless
specifically requested in other orders or specifically requested by the Court. Should
the Court require copies, the Court’s copies are to be delivered to the Clerk’s office
at 1100 Commerce Street, Room 1452, Dallas, TX 75242. The Clerk’s office is
located on the 14th floor of the Earle Cabell Federal Building. Their phone number
is (214) 753-2200.
(This Space Left Blank Intentionally)
Revised 25.08.04; Adopted 25.08.08 Page 6 of 16
II. MOTION PRACTICE
Requirements for Specific Motions:
A. Length and Contents for Motions and Briefs - Limit any motion, response, brief,
or memorandum to 6,250 words; limit any reply to 2,500 words. Use 14-point font
in the body of the briefing and 11-point font for footnotes. Do not file a sur-reply
absent alternate permission from the Court.
PROVIDE A CERTIFICATE OF WORD COUNT FOLLOWING THE
SIGNATURE BLOCK. Reliance on word-processor register is sufficient in this
regard. Word limits shall not include the case caption, table of contents, table of
authorities, signature block, and certificates. However, word counts shall include
footnotes.
The Court rarely extends word limits. Anticipate and seek resolution of any motion
for extension well in advance of filing deadlines.
Any motion, response, reply, brief, or memorandum must contain items (3), (4),
(6), and (7) from the list below. Any motion, response, reply, brief, or memorandum
that has more than ten (10) pages of argument must contain all of the following:
1. A table of contents setting forth the page number of each section, including
all headings designated in the body of the brief or memorandum;
2. A table of citations of cases, statutes, rules, textbooks, and other authorities,
alphabetically arranged;
3. A short statement of the nature and stage of the proceeding;
4. A statement of the issues to be ruled on by the court and a short statement,
supported by authority, of the standard of review for each issue;
5. A short summary of the argument;
6. Informative headings identifying separate sections of the argument; and
7. A short conclusion stating the precise relief sought.
CITATIONS. Provide pinpoint citation for all legal authority. Do the same for
evidence. For instance, cite to page and line for depositions, to page and paragraph
number for affidavits and pleadings, and to page and section number for contracts
and similar materials. Use Bates number as the page reference where available.
Revised 25.08.04; Adopted 25.08.08 Page 7 of 16
Failure to comply with these requirements may result in the striking of the
corresponding filing from the record, without prejudice to compliant refiling of the
same.
B. Summary Judgment - The time for filing motions for summary judgment set forth
in the local rules is modified by the Judge’s scheduling order. Unless modified
hereunder, Judge Brown strictly follows the local rules with respect to the content
of summary judgment motions and responses as well as the requirements for
briefing and appendices. Read the relevant local civil rules before submitting a
motion for summary judgment or response thereto.
Limit any summary judgment principal brief to 12,500 words; limit any reply to
6,250 words. See N.D. Tex. Civ. R. 56.5(b). Use 14-point font in the body of the
briefing and 11-point font for footnotes. Do not file a sur-reply absent alternate
permission from the Court.
PROVIDE A CERTIFICATE OF WORD COUNT FOLLOWING THE
SIGNATURE BLOCK. Reliance on word-processor register is sufficient in this
regard. Word limits shall not include the case caption, table of contents, table of
authorities, signature block, and certificates. However, word counts shall include
footnotes.
The Court rarely extends word limits. Anticipate and seek resolution of any motion
for extension well in advance of filing deadlines.
Failure to comply with these requirements may result in the striking of the
corresponding filing from the record, without prejudice to compliant refiling of the
same.
Regarding appendices, the Court strongly prefers Parties adhere to the following
practices:
• Submit your Appendix in PDF format with Appendix page numbers
stamped on every page. Include the Appendix page number span in the
name of the PDF (for example, “Appendix 1 - App. 1 to 100.pdf” or
“Exhibit B – Doe Declaration - App. 45 to 200.pdf”).
• Provide a table of contents with each Appendix, which enumerates each
document in the Appendix along with the corresponding Appendix page
number(s).
• Bookmark each document in the Appendix within the PDF.
• Combine Appendix documents into a single attachment to file as few
separate PDF attachments as possible. If more than one PDF must be filed,
Revised 25.08.04; Adopted 25.08.08 Page 8 of 16
separate the PDFs by complete sets of Appendix documents; that is, avoid
splitting a single Appendix document across several PDFs.
• If the Appendix contains high-resolution images that exceed an 8.5x11
inch page, scale the image down to fill an 8.5x11 inch page.
C. Motions to Dismiss - Do not combine a motion to dismiss and an answer in one
document. If a motion to dismiss becomes moot due to the filing of an amended
complaint, the moving party must notify the Court.
To advance the case efficiently and minimize the cost of litigation, the Court will
provide parties an opportunity to amend their pleadings once before considering a
Federal Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss. The following procedure must be
followed before any party files a Motion to Dismiss under Federal Rule
12(b)(6):
1. Counsel shall confer with opposing counsel and provide written notice
prior to filing a Federal Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss:
• To facilitate the efficient progression of litigation, a party or
counsel who anticipates filing a Motion to Dismiss under Federal
Rule 12(b)(6) must first confer with opposing counsel concerning
the proposed deficiencies and the expected basis of the Motion. This
conference shall include written (email or certified mail) notification
of the Plaintiff’s right to amend the pleading under these procedures,
specifying the proposed deficiencies and the deadlines below.
2. Following this notification conference, if the Plaintiff intends to amend
the pleading, the Plaintiff shall file an Advisory of such intent with the
Court within seven (7) days of receipt of the notification letter. The
Amended Complaint must be filed within seven (7) days of the filing date
of the Advisory.
3. If the Complaint is not so amended by the established deadline, the
Defendant may file a Federal Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss. If the
Defendant believes any Amended Complaint is still deficient, the Defendant
shall file the Motion within the time prescribed by Federal Rule 12(a).
• When a party files a Motion to Dismiss under Federal Rule 12(b),
a Certificate of Conference shall accompany the Motion
expressly stating the movant complied with this Standing Order
by informing the Plaintiff of the basis of any anticipated motion,
the date of this notice, and noting the non-movant did not timely
amend its pleading or the amended pleading is still deficient.
• The Court will strike any Federal Rule 12(b) Motion to Dismiss if
it does not contain the required Certificate of Conference, which
Revised 25.08.04; Adopted 25.08.08 Page 9 of 16
may preclude its re-filing given the time limits prescribed in Federal
Rule 12(a).
4. Under this practice, the Plaintiff has already been provided notice of the
proposed deficiencies and the opportunity to amend the pleading prior to
the filing of a Motion to Dismiss. Consequently, if the Court finds any
Motion to Dismiss has merit, the Plaintiff shall not be allowed an
additional opportunity to amend its Complaint following a properly
filed Motion to Dismiss, except upon express leave of court. See Great
Plains Trust Co. v. Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co., 313 F.3d 305, 329
(5th Cir. 2002); Herrmann Holdings Ltd. v. Lucent Techs. Inc., 302 F.3d
552, 567 (5th Cir. 2002).
5. If the Court denies the Motion to Dismiss and the case goes forward, the
Plaintiff may seek leave of Court to amend the live Complaint later if
circumstances warrant or require amendment.
6. Federal Rule 12(a) prescribes time limits for the filing of an Answer and for
the filing of motions under Federal Rule 12. The requirements of this
Standing Order should not preclude or interfere with these time limits.
D. Continuance – Judge Brown follows Local Rule 40.1. N.D. Tex. Civ. R. 40.1. (“A
motion for continuance of a trial setting must be signed by the moving party as well
as by the party’s attorney of record. Unless the presiding judge orders otherwise,
the granting of a motion for continuance will not extend or revive any deadline that
has already expired in a case.”).
E. Motions in Limine - A motion in limine must be confined to matters actually in
dispute. Do not file boilerplate motions in limine. The Judge’s scheduling order
establishes a deadline for filing motions in limine.
F. Withdrawal of Counsel –Judge Brown requires an attorney seeking to withdraw to
comply fully with the requirements of Local Rule 83.12. See N.D. Tex. Civ. R.
83.12 (governing withdrawal or substitution of an attorney). The Judge strongly
disfavors motions to withdraw in cases where withdrawal would affect the trial
date, the discovery process, or the dispositive motion deadline.
G. Hearings on Motions - In most circumstances, Judge Brown makes a ruling based
upon briefs; however, the parties may make a written request for oral argument or
the Judge may sua sponte schedule a hearing.
Should the Court permit a hearing on a motion: (i) for a non-evidentiary
hearing, the Court permits a maximum of 45 minutes for each side (not each
party); (ii) for an evidentiary hearing, the Court permits a maximum of 75
minutes for each side (not each party).
Revised 25.08.04; Adopted 25.08.08 Page 10 of 16
H. Proposed Orders - Proposed orders are required to be submitted with EVERY
non-dispositive motion. A proposed order must be submitted via e-mail in a Word
compatible format as instructed in the CM/ECF system’s "Proposed Orders" event.
The proposed orders must be e-mailed to:
[email protected] and
must include the case number and the document number of the referenced motion
in the subject line. Copy opposing counsel on the email when submitting the
proposed order.
I. Citations to the Evidentiary Record - All positions and statements contained in the
body of any motion, response, or reply must contain specific cites to the record
supporting the party’s statement in the body of the document. The Court will not
search the record for evidence and may not consider any evidence that is not
specifically cited in the parties’ briefs.
J. Citations to Law – All legal positions and statements contained in the body of any
motion, response, or reply must contain specific cites to the law in the body of the
document. The Court prefers case law citations to Westlaw.
K. Footnotes – Limit footnotes to only explanatory statements and dicta. Do not use
footnotes for necessary citations to law or the record. Use only in-line citations for
necessary citations to law or the record.
(This Space Left Blank Intentionally)
Revised 25.08.04; Adopted 25.08.08 Page 11 of 16
III. NOTICE TO PARTIES ASSERTING FEDERAL JURISDICTION IN DIVERSITY CASES
A. Under 28 U.S.C. § 1332 there must be complete diversity between plaintiffs and
defendants. Complete diversity requires that all persons on one side of the
controversy be citizens of different states from all persons on the other side. The
party asserting federal jurisdiction in a diversity action has the burden to
demonstrate complete diversity. Howery v. Allstate Ins. Co., 243 F.3d 912, 916 (5th
Cir. 2001). Parties must make “clear, distinct, and precise affirmative jurisdictional
allegations.” MidCap Media Fin., L.L.C. v. Pathway Data, Inc., 929 F.3d 310, 313
(5th Cir. 2019).
1. Individuals: For individuals, pleading residence is insufficient; the notice
of removal must plead their citizenship. MidCap Media Fin., L.L.C. v.
Pathway Data, Inc., 929 F.3d 310, 313 (5th Cir. 2019).
2. LLCS, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations: The citizenship
of a limited-liability business organization is determined by the citizenship
of its members. Harvey v. Grey Wolf Drilling Co., 542 F.3d 1077, 1080 (5th
Cir. 2008). Similarly, the citizenship of a partnership is determined by the
citizenship of all its partners. Carden v. Arkoma Assocs., 494 U.S. 185, 195-
96 (1990); Corfield v. Dallas Glen Hills, L.P., 355 F.3d 853, 856 n.3 (5th
Cir. 2003). “A party seeking to establish diversity jurisdiction must
specifically allege the citizenship of every member of every LLC or
partnership involved in a litigation.” Settlement Funding, L.L.C. v. Rapid
Settlements, Ltd., 851 F.3d 530, 536 (5th Cir. 2017). When members or
partners are themselves entities or associations, citizenship must be traced
through however many layers of members/partners there are until arriving
at the entity that is not a limited liability entity or partnership and identifying
its citizenship status. See Mullins v. TestAmerica, Inc., 564 F.3d 386, 397-
98 (5th Cir. 2009).
• If the members of an LLC or partners of a partnership are unknown
to the removing party even after a diligent investigation, the
removing party may allege its citizenship on information and belief.
Lincoln Ben. Life Co. v. AEI Life, LLC, 800 F.3d 99 (3d Cir. 2015).
Before doing so, the removing party should consult the sources at
its disposal, including court filings and other public records to
ensure good faith pleading. Id. at 108.
3. Corporations: A corporation is a citizen of its state(s) of incorporation and
of the state in which its principal place of business is located, as determined
by the “nerve center” test. 28 U.S.C. § 1332(c)(1); Lincoln Property Co. v.
Roche, 546 U.S. 81 (2005); Hertz Corp. v. Friend, 559 U.S. 77 (2010). The
Revised 25.08.04; Adopted 25.08.08 Page 12 of 16
removing party must allege both a corporation’s state of incorporation and
its principal place of business. MidCap Media Fin., L.L.C. v. Pathway Data,
Inc., 929 F.3d 310, 314 (5th Cir. 2019).
(This Space Left Blank Intentionally)
Revised 25.08.04; Adopted 25.08.08 Page 13 of 16
IV. TRIAL PROCEDURES AND VOIR DIRE
A. Trial and pretrial procedures are detailed in the Court’s scheduling order and are
discussed at the pretrial conference. The Judge typically conducts the bulk of the
voir dire. As detailed in the scheduling order, the Court asks the parties to submit
written questions for voir dire prior to trial—from which the Court may ask the
venire panel.
B. Judge Brown’s courtroom has an ELMO projector and ClickShare. Attorneys are
required to schedule a training session prior to trial. Please reach out to Lisa Matz,
the Courtroom Deputy, at
[email protected] to schedule a training time.
(This Space Left Blank Intentionally)
Revised 25.08.04; Adopted 25.08.08 Page 14 of 16
V. CONTACT WITH COURT PERSONNEL
A. For civil case management, telephone or e-mail inquiries should be made to
Cynthia Thornton, 214-753-2343,
[email protected].
B. For criminal case management, telephone or e-mail inquires should be made
to Lisa Matz, 214-753-2683,
[email protected].
C. Do not make any inquiries to Judge Brown or her law clerks.
D. Inquiries about motions and the case status should be in writing.
(This Space Left Blank Intentionally)
Revised 25.08.04; Adopted 25.08.08 Page 15 of 16
VI. MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURES
A. Requests for Extensions and Continuances - All requests for extensions of time
and continuances must be submitted by written motion to the Court after a
conference with opposing counsel. Please do not call the Court to ask for an
extension or continuance. The parties must file requests for extensions of time as
motions, rather than as stipulations.
B. Status of Pending Motions - Please do not call to inquire about the status of a
pending motion.
C. Phone Calls to the Court – If you have a bonafide emergency situation of which
the Court should be aware, please make a good faith attempt to include opposing
counsel on the call. Leave a message explaining the situation. Leave your name
and the name of the party you are represent along with the case number, and the
Court will respond to your emergency as soon as possible.
D. No one under the age of 18 is allowed in the courtroom.
E. Notice of settlement discussions - Notify the Court by letter or email whenever
serious settlement discussions are underway. The Court will postpone consideration
of pending motions until advised of success or impasse.
F. Revisions - The Court adheres to these procedures and forms to answer common
questions that arise during litigation, to reduce confusion as to the Court’s
preferences, and to guide the proper and efficient resolution of the par-ties’
disputes. The Court revises these materials as experience dictates and provides
updated versions on its website.
It is so ORDERED.
Revised 25.08.04; Adopted 25.08.08 Page 16 of 16
