Judge-Specific Requirements — Jane Boyle

Directory UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Northern District of Texas Reed O'Connor, Chief Judge Karen Mitchell, Clerk of Court Search form Search Court Information Judges Rules & Orders Filing Resources FAQs Attorneys Jurors Pro Se Forms & Records Senior District Judge Jane J. Boyle You are here Home » Judges » District Judges Chambers:  214-753-2740 Courtroom Deputy: Anthony Christo 214-753-2748 E-Mail: [email protected] Court Reporter: Shawnie Archuleta 214-753-2747 Courtroom Technology 1100 Commerce Street, Room 1520 Dallas, Texas 75242-1003 Courtroom: 1516 Case Letter Designation:  (B) Judge Tabs Judge Specific Requirements Judge Boyle follows the Northern District’s Local Civil and Criminal Rules. If the information set out below does not address your particular question, you should look to the Local Rules. Judge Boyle also notifies the parties by order of specific requirements that apply to each case, some of which modify the Local Rules. PLEASE NOTE: The following information is intended to acquaint counsel and litigants with the Judge’s typical procedures and requirements, not to take the place of common sense or of orders entered in specific cases. Case Management Procedures Counsel must ensure that all pleadings filed via the CM/ECF system strictly comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2 and Fed. R. Crim. P. 49.1. These rules regulate the transmission of private and case sensitive information through the CM/ECF system. Preliminary Pretrial Conference ("Rule 16 Conference") - The Judge does not typically conduct Rule 16 conferences but will schedule such a conference in cases where she finds it would aid in case management. The Judge will also schedule a Rule 16 conference when requested by the parties. Rule 26(f) Conference - The Court requires the parties to comply, in person, with the conference requirements of Rule 26(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Court does not require a face-to-face meeting in cases involving pro se or prisoner litigants. If, at the time the Judge enters her scheduling proposal order (“Status Report Order”), the parties have already conducted a Rule 26(f) scheduling conference that fully complies with the one required by the order, they need not convene an additional conference. If the parties have already submitted a Rule 26(f) written report that outlines their proposed discovery plan, they must also submit the joint proposal required by the Status Report Order because it contains matters not required by Rule 26(f). The parties may, however, adopt portions of their written Rule 26(f) report by reference if they attach a photocopy of the report to the proposal required by the Status Report Order. Status Report/Scheduling Order - Once all defendants have filed answers, the Judge issues a Status Report Order requiring the parties to meet face-to-face for the purpose of filing a joint status report. On receipt of the joint status report, the Judge issues a scheduling order. The scheduling order imposes deadlines on the parties and specifically modifies some local rules. Scheduling orders in patent cases are governed by Amended Miscellaneous Order No. 62 of this district, which may be found under the "Rules" tab on this website. Modification of the Scheduling Order - Except for the discovery deadline, the Court’s scheduling order cannot be modified by the parties without leave of court. The parties must file requests for extensions of time as motions, rather than as stipulations. Referrals to Magistrate Judges - Discovery matters are routinely referred to a magistrate judge. Mediation - Typically, the Judge refers civil cases to mediation unless the parties indicate, and the Court agrees, that mediation would not be fruitful. The parties are given an opportunity to agree upon a mediator and the Judge will appoint that mediator to the case. If the parties cannot agree, the Court will select a mediator for the case. Judge Boyle’s specific requirements for mediation will be set forth in a mediation order after designation of the mediator. Settlement Discussions - In her scheduling order, Judge Boyle directs the parties and their respective lead counsel to hold a face-to-face meeting to discuss settlement of the case at least ten days before the final pretrial conference. Within 7 days of this meeting, the parties must jointly prepare and file a written report detailing information about the meeting, such as whether meaningful progress toward settlement was made and a statement regarding the prospects for settlement. Requests for Hearings or Conferences - Judge Boyle will consider written requests for hearings or conferences with the Court provided they are made after conferencing with opposing counsel to attempt to reach agreement as to proposed hearing dates and times. If agreement has not been reached, the party seeking the hearing or conference should so notify the Court in their written request and copy opposing counsel with the request. Judge's Copies - Effective 4/23/26  – Judge Boyle requires a paper copy of any motion or brief that spans 25 or more pages (excluding title page, table of contents, table of authorities, and signature block) and any appendix that spans 50 or more pages. Judge Boyle does not require a paper copy of any other electronic filing. Motion Practice Requirements for Specific Motions: Summary Judgment - The time for filing motions for summary judgment set forth in the local rules is modified by the Judge’s scheduling order. Judge Boyle strictly follows the local rules with respect to the content of summary judgment motions and responses as well as the requirements for briefing and appendices. Read the relevant local civil rules before submitting a motion for summary judgment or response thereto. Motions to Dismiss - Do not combine a motion to dismiss and an answer in one document. If a motion to dismiss becomes moot due to the filing of an amended complaint, the moving party must notify the Court. Continuance - See Local Rule 40.1. In Limine - A motion in limine must be confined to matters actually in dispute. (No boilerplate motions should be filed). The Judge’s scheduling order establishes a deadline for filing a motion in limine . Withdrawal of Counsel - See Local Rule 83.12. The Judge requires an attorney seeking to withdraw to comply fully with the requirements of Local Rule 83.12. The Judge strongly disfavors motions to withdraw in cases where withdrawal would affect the trial date, the discovery process, or the dispositive motion deadline. Hearings on Motions - In most circumstances, Judge Boyle makes a ruling based upon briefs; however, the parties may make a written request for oral argument or the Judge may sua sponte schedule a hearing. Judge's Copies of Motions, Responses etc. - See ¶ I. J., supra . Proposed Orders - Proposed orders are required to be submitted with EVERY non-dispositive motion. Proposed orders must be submitted via email in a WordPerfect or Word-compatible format as instructed in the CM/ECF system’s “Proposed Orders” Event. The proposed orders must be emailed to: [email protected] and include the case number and the document number of the referenced motion in the subject line. Make sure to “cc” opposing counsel. Discovery Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a) 26(a)(1) - Parties are to make initial disclosures no later than thirty days from the date of the Judge’s status report order. Formal Discovery - The discovery deadline is for completion of discovery—including discovery concerning expert witnesses. The parties generally may agree to extend this discovery deadline, provided: (1) the extension does not affect the trial setting, dispositive motions deadline, challenges to experts deadline, or pretrial submission dates; and (2) written notice of the extension is given to the Court. But the Court always retains the right to reject an agreed extension if it finds that the parties are failing to move the case expeditiously. Any motion to compel discovery or for a protective order must be filed by the later of: (1) 14 days before the completion-of-discovery deadline; or (2) 10 days after the discovery response at issue was served or due to be served. Any other motions that are related to discovery but do not seek to compel or avoid as-yet uncompleted depositions, service of discovery responses, or production of documents or electronically stored information must be filed by 3 days after the completion-of-discovery deadline. Any motion to quash or for protective order relating to a deposition that is filed less than five days before the scheduled or noticed date of the deposition will be summarily denied unless, on proper motion, the Court grants leave for the motion to be filed based on a showing of extraordinary or extenuating circumstances that prevented the requested relief from being presented to the Court at an earlier date. Filing Discovery Materials - Parties are to follow Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5(d) and Local Rule 5.2. Trial Procedures Scheduling Order - THE MOST CRITICAL COMPONENT OF SUCCESSFUL TRIAL PREPARATION IN JUDGE BOYLE’S COURT IS TO READ HER SCHEDULING ORDER WHICH DETAILS HER PRETRIAL REQUIREMENTS. Rule 26(a)(3) Pretrial Disclosures - Per the scheduling order, parties are required to make the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(3)(A)-(B) approximately fifty days before the trial setting. Within 14 days thereafter, a party must serve and file a list disclosing any objections, together with the grounds therefor, to: the use of any witnesses (except for Daubert objections) identified under Rule 26(a)(3)(A)(i); the use under Rule 32(a) of a deposition designated by another party under Rule 26(a)(3)(A)(ii); and the admissibility of materials identified under Rule 26(a)(3)(A)(iii). Objections not so disclosed, other than objections under Rules 402 and 403 of the Federal Rules of Evidence, are waived unless excused by the Court for good cause. ( Daubert motions are filed separately by a deadline set in the scheduling order well in advance of trial). Pretrial Materials - The Court’s scheduling order sets a deadline (usually two weeks in advance of trial) for filing pretrial materials. The scheduling order also details the Judge’s requirements for each pretrial filing including the pretrial order, the witness and exhibit lists, deposition designations, jury instructions, proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law, motions in limine, voir dire, and trial briefs. Failing to timely file pretrial materials could result in waiving the right to present those materials at trial. Exchanging Exhibits - No later than two days before the pretrial conference the parties must exchange a complete set of marked exhibits (including demonstrative exhibits) with opposing counsel (except for large or voluminous items that cannot be easily reproduced). Proposed Jury Instructions/Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law - The Judge relies upon the Fifth Circuit Pattern Jury Instructions and applicable state law pattern jury instructions. Requested jury instructions or proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law must be annotated with relevant Fifth Circuit authority or applicable state authority. Pretrial Conference - Each party shall be represented by at least one attorney who will conduct the trial and who has authority to enter into stipulations and admissions that would facilitate the admission of evidence and reduce the time and expense of trial. Fed.R.Civ.P. 16 (c), (d). Parties should be prepared to address the following issues: Pre-admission of exhibits by agreement of the parties; Pretrial motions and objections, including objections to witness and exhibit lists, deposition designations and motions in limine . (Parties should be prepared to present legal authority with respect to disputed legal issues); Potential amendments to the proposed pretrial order; Timing of the trial; Possible bifurcation of liability and damages phases of the case; Settlement; Courtroom decorum and trial procedures; and Any other issue relevant to the trial of the case. Electronic Equipment in the Courtroom  - Judge Boyle has an electronic courtroom. Arrange a time to set up equipment with the Courtroom Deputy (214-753-2748). Voir Dire - The Judge conducts a portion of the voir dire . The attorneys are given approximately fifteen minutes for follow-up questions. Follow up questions are not instructions on the law or arguments by counsel. Per the scheduling order, attorneys are required to submit written questions in advance of trial that they would like the Court to ask of the panel. On completion of voir dire , if any jurors have indicated a potential bias, the Judge will question jurors individually, outside the presence of the other panel members. Miscellaneous Procedures Communications With the Court: Requests for Extensions and Continuances - All requests for extensions of time and continuances must be submitted by written motion to the Court after a conference with opposing counsel. Please do not call the Court to ask for an extension or continuance unless it is a rare emergency and then only after conferring with opposing counsel. The parties must file requests for extensions of time as motions, rather than as stipulations. Status of Pending Motions - Please do not call to inquire about the status of a pending motion. If there are extenuating circumstances regarding a pending motion that should be brought to the Court’s attention, please electronically file an appropriate notice or request for relief via the CM/ECF system. Phone Messages - When leaving phone messages with chambers, always include your name, the cause number of the case you are calling about, the identity of the party you represent, and the specific reason for your call. E-mail Communications - except as provided in Judge Boyle's Scheduling orders in civil and criminal cases, DO NOT EMAIL THE COURT . As addressed above in ¶ I. A., all cases pending in Judge Boyle’s court, including those involving pro se litigants, are required to enroll in the Electronic Case Filing (“CM/ECF”) System. Information about how to register for electronic filing can be found on the Northern District of Texas website at: http://www.txnd.uscourts.gov/file-registration . The purpose of requiring electronic registration and notice is to ensure that all interested parties receive Court filings and that an official record of court filings be kept. Communications through e-mail, as opposed to electronic filing, do not contain the same safeguards, nor do they constitute official filings made as part of the record. Accordingly, under no circumstances may a party request relief or send other communications or notices to the Court via e-mail. Only proposed orders sent to the Boyle Orders email address, as outlined above in ¶ II. H., will be reviewed. All other emails sent to Court staff or the Boyle Orders or Boyle Clerk email addresses will be disregarded without notice. Biography Birth: 1954 Year Service Began: 2004 Appointed By: President George W. Bush Education: Bachelor of Science with honors from the University of Texas at Austin in 1977; Jurist Doctor from Southern Methodist University, Dedman School of Law in 1981 Judicial: United States Magistrate Judge for the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division 1990 - 2002 Legal Practice: United States Attorney, Northern District of Texas 2002 - 2004; Assistant United States Attorney, Northern District of Texas - Criminal Section 1987 - 1989, Civil Section 1989 - 1990; Assistant District Attorney, Dallas County, Texas - Trial Section 1981 - 1985, Chief Felony Prosecutor for the Major Commercial Fraud Unit, Specialized Crime Division 1985 - 1987 Current Memberships:  Fifth Circuit District Judges Association; State Bar of Texas; Texas Bar Foundation; Dallas Bar Foundation, Fellow; Dallas Bar Association; DBA, Business Litigation Section, Council Member; William “Mac” Taylor Chapter, American Inns of Court; Barbara M. G. Lynn American Inn of Court District Judges Chief Judge Reed O'Connor (O) Judge Sam A. Lindsay (L) Judge Ed Kinkeade (K) Judge Karen Gren Scholer (S) Judge Matthew J. Kacsmaryk (Z) Judge Mark T. Pittman (P) Judge James Wesley Hendrix (H) Judge Brantley Starr (X) Judge Ada Brown (E) Senior Judge A. Joe Fish (G) Senior Judge Sidney A. Fitzwater (D) Senior Judge Sam R. Cummings (C) Senior Judge Terry R. Means (Y) Senior Judge David C. Godbey (N) Senior Judge Jane J. Boyle (B) Magistrate Judges Judge Jeffrey L. Cureton (BJ) Judge Renee H. Toliver (BK) Judge David L. Horan (BN) Judge Hal R. Ray, Jr. (BP) Judge Lee Ann Reno (BR) Judge Rebecca Rutherford (BT) Judge John R. Parker (BU) Judge Amanda 'Amy' R. Burch (BV) Judge Brian McKay (BW) Judge Specific Requirements Oath Complaints Judicial Seminar Disclosure MDL Cases Judge History Opinions Duty Judge Roster Hearing Schedules