The Law Mind

Judge Holmes' Standard Form Initial Case Management Order — Magistrate Judge Holmes

M.D. Tenn. Judge Practices (Magistrate Judge Holmes) · Magistrate Judge Holmes

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT _________________ ) Plaintiff ) ) Case No. ) Judge _________________ ) Magistrate Judge Holmes Defendant ) PROPOSED INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER As a preliminary matter, the Court reminds the parties and their attorneys that all attorneys of record and attorneys who otherwise participate on behalf of a party in this case must familiarize themselves with and follow the case management procedures and instructions detailed in the Court’s Notice and Order. (Docket No. ___.) A. JURISDICTION: The court has jurisdiction pursuant to ______________. B. BRIEF THEORIES OF THE PARTIES: For Plaintiff: For Defendant: C. ISSUES RESOLVED: Jurisdiction and venue [if resolved]. D. ISSUES STILL IN DISPUTE: Damages and liability. [List any other disputed issues.] E. INITIAL DISCLOSURES: The parties shall exchange initial disclosures pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(a)(1), which must include copies (not simply descriptions) of responsive documents and other materials (e.g. photos, videos, etc.), on or before _____________. F. CASE RESOLUTION PLAN AND JOINT STATUS REPORTS: The parties are encouraged to make settlement efforts throughout the pendency of this case and must make a minimum of two independent, substantive attempts at resolution. By no later than _____________, the parties must file a joint case resolution status report confirming their first substantive attempt at settlement. The parties must have conducted enough discovery or otherwise exchanged enough information prior to this date to substantively evaluate and discuss settlement. By no later than _______________, the parties must file another joint status report, which either confirms their second substantive attempt at case resolution or updates the Court on the status of their intended second attempt. The parties’ joint reports must state the specific steps taken toward case resolution, including that an offer or demand was made and responded to and that counsel discussed the parties’ positions and specific next steps to promote case resolution. In other words, the parties must “show their work” in creating a plan to facilitate successful settlement negotiations. The parties may mediate by agreement without the need of further order unless referral for pro bono mediation is requested (which must be made by motion). Any motion for pro bono mediation must include a statement as to why private mediation is not feasible. Any motion for a judicial settlement conference must state (i) the reasons why mediation is not feasible and why a judicial settlement conference is the preferable means of attempting to resolve the case; (ii) the parties’ proposed timing for scheduling of the settlement conference; and (iii) any preference of a particular Magistrate Judge to conduct the settlement conference. The parties’ compliance with this case resolution plan is not optional. The fact that discovery is ongoing or that a dispositive motion is pending does not relieve the parties of their compulsory obligations under this case resolution plan. 2 G. DISCOVERY: The parties must, by no later than ____________,(i) complete all written discovery and depose all fact witnesses and (ii) bring all discovery disputes to the Court’s attention, unless otherwise permitted by the Court. Written discovery and scheduling of depositions must proceed promptly. Discovery is not stayed during dispositive or other motions, unless ordered by the Court. The Court expects all parties and their counsel to cooperate in discovery and to act courteously and professionally in the resolution of any discovery disputes. The Court may impose appropriate sanctions, including any of those authorized by Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(f) or 37(b)(2)(A), upon a finding of a failure to comply with this or any discovery order or upon a finding of other discovery misconduct. No discovery disputes may be brought to the Court for resolution before lead counsel for all parties have conducted an in-person meeting and made a good faith effort to resolve any dispute(s). Discovery disputes that cannot be resolved after the in-person meeting must be brought promptly to the attention of the Magistrate Judge by the filing of a joint discovery dispute statement and a joint motion for a discovery conference. It will be within the Magistrate Judge’s discretion to allow filing of discovery-related motions, after counsel have scheduled and participated in a discovery conference. In connection with any discovery conference, the parties must file a joint discovery dispute statement, of no more than 3 pages per affected party per issue, which identifies and describes the specific discovery request(s) in dispute and details each party’s position with supporting facts and legal authorities, including as to any proportionality considerations. The joint discovery dispute statement must certify that lead counsel for all parties conducted the required in-person meeting and made a good faith effort to resolve each discovery dispute presented in the statement. No discovery conference will be held until a compliant joint statement is filed. If the 3 joint statement is sufficiently detailed, any party may adopt by reference the joint statement for purposes of Local Rule 7.01, but must clearly state in the filing made in accordance with the timing requirements of Local Rule 7.01 that the joint statement is adopted as the party’s memorandum of law or response. H. AMENDMENTS OR ADDITION OF PARTIES: Any motions to amend or to add parties must be filed by no later than ___________ and must comply with Local Rules 7.01 and 15.01. Failure to comply with local rules may result in summary denial of the motion. Amendments or addition of parties by written consent under Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2) must clearly and conspicuously state that the amended pleading is filed by written consent. Failure to clearly and conspicuously provide notice of the consent filing may result in the amended pleading being stricken. I. [only if applicable] DISCLOSURE AND DEPOSITIONS OF EXPERTS: The plaintiff must identify and disclose all expert witnesses and expert reports on or before __________. The defendant must identify and disclose all expert witnesses and reports on or before ________. Rebuttal experts and reports shall be permitted only by leave of court. Unless otherwise provided for in a separate pretrial order, supplemental expert disclosures, which specifically include, but are not limited to, any supplemental information to expert reports, must be made in accordance with Rule 26(a) and (e). Supplemental expert opinions or other expert disclosures not timely disclosed may be excluded at trial. See Local Rule 39.01(c)(5)(C). Expert depositions must be completed by ____________________. J. ANOTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. The Court does not set second case management conferences or require the parties to file status reports as a matter of course in civil actions. The parties and their counsel are reminded of their responsibility to prepare 4 this case according to the case management schedule. Failure to do so may result in any of the remedies authorized by Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(f). The Court will not provide reminders of case management deadlines and will not otherwise prompt the parties to give attention to this case. The parties may request that a case management conference be set by filing a joint motion for a case management conference, which must identify all issues to be discussed and detail the status of all case management events. If the purpose of the requested conference is to discuss extending case management deadlines, the motion must comply with the requirements for modifications of the case management order as instructed below. The parties must also state whether they request an in-person or telephonic case management conference. K. DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS: Any motions under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 must be filed and briefed in accordance with that rule and with Local Rule 7.01. Motions for summary judgment and all other non-Rule 12 dispositive motions must be filed by no later than _________. Responses to dispositive motions must be filed within 28 days after the filing of the motion. Briefs or memoranda of law in support of or in opposition to a dispositive motion shall not exceed 25 pages. Optional replies may be filed within 14 days after the filing of the response and shall not exceed 5 pages. No motion for partial summary judgment shall be filed except by permission of the Court. Any party wishing to file such a motion must first file a separate motion that gives the justification for filing a partial summary judgment motion in terms of overall economy of time and expense for the parties, counsel, and the Court. Before filing or responding to a summary judgment motion, attorneys are required to read and follow Local Rule 56.01 generally and specifically Judge Richardson's guidance in McLemore v. Gumucio, 619 F. Supp. 3d 816 (M.D. Tenn. 2021) (rev’d on other grounds), regarding what should (or should not) be included in the movant's "statement of undisputed material facts.” 5 Counsel must carefully draft the statement of undisputed material facts and response to ensure that each is a concise, focused, and non-argumentative statement of facts (not opinions, argument, or legal conclusions) that are material to the outcome of the case and are undisputed as supported by the record. L. ELECTRONIC DISCOVERY. The parties anticipate reaching an agreement on how to conduct electronic discovery. Any agreement between the parties must be reduced to writing, and must either be (i) filed as a stipulation of agreed-upon electronic discovery procedures or (ii) if the parties request court approval, submitted as proposed agreed order with an accompanying motion for approval. In the absence of compliance with this provision, the default standards of Administrative Order No. 174-1 will apply. [May also include any agreed-upon ESI protocol or procedures or agree that Administrative Order No. 174-1 will apply.] [For Judge Campbell’s cases only] The parties anticipate reaching an agreement on how to conduct electronic discovery. Any agreement between the parties must be reduced to writing, and must, within 14 days of the date of entry of this initial case management order, either be (i) filed as a stipulation of agreed-upon electronic discovery procedures or (ii) if the parties request court approval, submitted as proposed agreed order with an accompanying motion for approval. In the absence of compliance with this provision, the default standards of Administrative Order No. 174-1 will apply. [May also include any agreed-upon ESI protocol or procedures or agree that Administrative Order No. 174-1 will apply.] M. MODIFICATION OF CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER. Any motion to modify the case management order or any case management deadline must be filed at least seven (7) days in advance of the earliest impacted deadline. Unless a joint motion, the motion for modification must include a statement confirming that counsel for the moving party has discussed the requested 6 modification or extension with opposing counsel and whether there is any objection to the requested modification or extension. The motion for modification must also include: (i) the trial date and all deadlines, even unaffected deadlines, so that it will not be necessary for the Court to review one or more previous case management orders in consideration of the motion and (ii) a statement of counsel that the requested extension will not cause any dispositive motion deadline, including response and reply briefs, to be later than 120 days in advance of the trial date. Motions for extensions must also detail the moving party’s efforts at diligently complying with the originally scheduled deadline and the specific facts demonstrating good cause for modification of the deadline as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(4). Failure to do so may result in denial of the requested extension. N. [For Judge Campbell’s cases only] REQUESTS TO SEAL DOCUMENTS OR PORTIONS OF DOCUMENTS. Any party requesting that documents or portions of documents be sealed, including without limitation for use as exhibits at trial, must file a motion to seal in accordance with Administrative Order No. 167-1 (Administrative Practices and Procedures for Electronic Case Filing) and Local Rules 5.03 and 7.01, which demonstrates compelling reasons to seal the documents and that the sealing is narrowly tailored to those reasons. The motion to seal, even if unopposed, must specifically analyze in detail, document by document, the propriety of secrecy, providing factual support and legal citations. Generally, only trade secrets, information covered by a recognized privilege (such as the attorney-client privilege), and information required by statute to be maintained in confidence is typically enough to overcome the presumption of public access. Failure to comply with these procedures or to provide sufficiently compelling reasons may result in denial of the request to seal documents or portions of documents. Protective orders should not provide that documents produced in discovery and designated as “confidential” 7 will be automatically sealed upon filing or if used at trial. Any such language in proposed protective orders will be stricken and may result in denial of the motion for entry of the proposed protective order. N/O. ESTIMATED TRIAL TIME AND TARGET TRIAL DATE: The [JURY or BENCH] trial of this action is expected to last approximately ______ days. A trial date no earlier than ____________is respectfully requested. 1 An order setting dates for trial and a pretrial conference, and detailing the parties’ pretrial obligations, will be entered separately by Judge _____________________. It is so ORDERED. BARBARA D. HOLMES United States Magistrate Judge APPROVED FOR ENTRY: Attorney for Plaintiff Attorney for Defendant 1 The parties were also reminded during the case management conference of their option to consent to final disposition by the Magistrate Judge pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73 and Local Rule 73.01. As discussed, if the parties wish to utilize this option, they may jointly complete and electronically file the form Notice, Consent and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge found on the Court’s website under the link for Forms. Not consenting will not result in any adverse consequences, and the Notice should be filed only if all parties consent to final disposition by the Magistrate Judge. 8
Official source: https://www.tnmd.uscourts.gov/sites/tnmd/files/HOLMES%20STANDARD%20ICMO%20%289.15.2025%20r · retrieved 2026-07-23