The Law Mind

Rule 26 Joint Report — Gail Weilheimer

E.D. Pa. Judge Practices (Gail Weilheimer) · Gail Weilheimer

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA : : v. : CIVIL ACTION NO. : : JOINT REPORT OF RULE 26(f) MEETING In accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f), counsel for the parties conferred on _____________ and submit the following report of their meeting for the Court’s consideration: Date and time of Rule 16 Conference: __________________ Plaintiff’s Counsel participating in the Rule 16 conference: __________________________ Defendant’s Counsel participating in the Rule 16 conference: ________________________ Basis of Jurisdiction: _________________________________________________ Jury trial _______ Non-Jury Trial _______ Arbitration _______ Do the parties consent to having this case proceed before a Magistrate Judge? _______ 1. Discussion of Claims, Defenses, and Relevant Issues You should assume that the Court has read the complaint and answer and is familiar with the claims. However, the facts supporting those claims and defenses are unknown. Therefore, counsel shall set forth concisely the controlling facts that the parties contend support their claims and defenses. Each party shall provide a brief factual summation of the case should be provided as an attachment and should not exceed two pages in length, double spaced in 12 point font. If counsel contends that one or more issues of fact or law will be dispositive, they should specifically identify such issues. Informal Disclosures Except in exceptional cases with a substantial quantity of documents, the parties are expected to have identified and produced documents falling within the definition of initial disclosures under Rule 26(a)(1) in advance of the Conference with sufficient time for opposing counsel to review them and be prepared to address them. When did parties participate with Rule 26(a)’s duty of self-executing disclosure? ______________ If the parties have not made the Rule 26(a) initial disclosures within the time required by the Court’s Order scheduling the pretrial conference, they should explain why not. Formal Discovery The discovery deadline should normally be no more than 90 - 120 days from the date of that the Court provided notice of the Rule 16 conference, not from the date of the conference itself. The parties anticipate discovery should be completed within ____ days. If you contend the discovery period should exceed 120 days, please explain: ______________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ Have the parties discussed issues relating to claims of privilege or of protection as trial- preparation material, as required by Rule 26(f)(3)(D)? ______________________________ Is electronic discovery needed: ______ If so, have the parties reached an agreement on how to conduct electronic discovery? ________. If the parties cannot reach an agreement, in most cases, the Court will enter an order incorporating default standards. The default order can be viewed at www.paed.uscourts.gov. Have all necessary authorizations been signed and exchanged in advance of the Conference (e.g. HIPPA release, tax return authorization)? _____yes ______ no Are there any discovery issues that should be addressed at the Rule 16 conference? _________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________ Does either party anticipate the use of experts? ______yes ______ no If yes, describe the nature of the experts? _________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________ Insurance Coverage: The parties shall provide full information about any potentially applicable insurance, regardless of any disclaimer or reservation of rights, including the limits of coverage, potential excess coverage, deductibles, self-insured retention (SIR), and whether any deductible or SIR includes payment of counsel fees and costs. Is there a relevant insurance policy? ______yes ______ no If yes, then attach the policy to your response. Dispositive Motions: Are dispositive motions expected? ______yes ______ no ______ unsure Are Daubert motions expected? ______yes ______ no ______ unsure Settlement or Resolution The parties should review Local Rule 53.3 before responding. Whenever possible, plaintiff or counter-claim plaintiffs should communicate a settlement demand before the Conference. Set forth the parties’ discussion about early resolution through ADR, motion or otherwise explain what steps were taken by counsel to advise the client of alternative dispute resolution options. If this matter is scheduled as a jury trial, the parties should disclose the most recent demand and offer of settlement. This information should not be disclosed if a bench trial is expected. Would a settlement conference be beneficial? ____________________________________ If so, when: _______ early ________ after discovery. Other Matters Please advise the Court if there are any other matters that will need to be addressed at the Conference. Counsel agrees that they have fully discussed their joint responses to this disclosure and have jointly submitted this response to the best of their knowledge of their respective cases: _______________________________ (Attorney Signature) _______________________________ (Attorney Signature)
Official source: https://www.paed.uscourts.gov/sites/paed/files/documents/procedures/weipole.pdf · retrieved 2026-07-23