The Law Mind

2024-1 In Re Plaintiffs Consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636 in SS Cases.pdf

D. Or. Standing Order — 2024-1 In Re Plaintiffs Consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdic

1p i :J4, q,r,;/ i Hll~·flP.P ___ R FrL F!l'l' 1_ ·r1r .:1. L- .:.. - •'\.. ~--· - ~. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON IN RE: PLAINTIFF'S CONSENT TO Standing Order No. 2024-1 MAGISTRATE JUDGE JURISDICTION PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 636 IN SOCIAL SECURITY CASES -----------------I Effective April 2, 2024, the following procedures will govern filing a plaintiffs determination regarding consent to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) in cases seeking review, under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), of the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security, notwithstanding the process set forth in Local Civil Rule 16-1 (b). Initial Case Filing When a Registered User of CM/ECF representing the plaintiff initiates the case, the Court will require the plaintiff to make a determination regarding consent in CM/ECF at the time of the initial case filing. If the plaintiff consents, the case will be assigned randomly to a magistrate judge. If the plaintiff declines to consent, the case will be assigned randomly to a district judge. When a plaintiff who is not a Registered User of CM/ECF initiates the case, the Clerk will assign the case randomly to a district judge. No plaintiff may file a consent after the case is assigned to a district judge. Remands Pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) Social Security case appeals following a previous remand by the District Court pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) will be given a new case number. The procedures explained above under Initial Case Filing apply to the plaintiff when filing after remand. Remands Pursuant to Sentence Six of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) Social Security appeals from a modified decision of the Commissioner following previous remand by the District Court pursuant to sentence six of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) will be reopened under the prior case number and assigned to the judge who issued the final order in the initial case. If that judge is unavailable: A new magistrate judge will be randomly assigned if the parties fully consented prior to reopenmg; or A new district judge will be randomly assigned if there was not full consent prior to reopenmg. No plaintiff may file a consent after the case is assigned to a district judge after remand under Sentence Four or Sentence Six of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). This order recognizes that the United States has consented to magistrate judge jurisdiction in all such cases, subject to reserved rights to withdraw the consent in a given matter and to withdraw the general consent as set forth in In re: Consent to Magistrate Judges Pursuant to 28 USC Section 636(c) in Social Security Cases, 06-mc-9130, May 26, 2006. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 18th day of March, 2024. MICHAEL MCSHANE CHIEF U.S. DISTRICT WDGE
Official source: https://www.ord.uscourts.gov/index.php/component/rsfiles/download-file/files?path=Standing · retrieved 2026-07-23