The Law Mind

2019-07 Second Amended

D. Nev. Standing Order — 2019-07 Second Amended

x OCTOBER 19, 2021 1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5 *** 6 IN THE MATTER OF: 7 SECOND AMENDED GENERAL ORDER PRO BONO PROGRAM 2019-07 8 9 10 WHEREAS, attorneys admitted to practice in this District have a strong tradition of 11 providing pro bono representation to indigent litigants in civil cases in the courts of the State of 12 Nevada; 13 WHEREAS, the Federal Bar Association, William S. Boyd School of Law, Legal Aid 14 Center of Southern Nevada, Nevada Legal Services, and Washoe Legal Services are willing to 15 support and coordinate providing qualified volunteer lawyers to represent indigent pro se litigants 16 in this District; 17 WHEREAS, volunteer lawyers provide an extremely valuable service, which enhances 18 our legal system; 19 WHEREAS, volunteer lawyers who provide their time and resources to preserve access 20 to justice for those unable to afford a lawyer greatly assist this Court in the performance of its 21 mission; 22 WHEREAS, the Judges of this District have authorized the implementation of the attached 23 Program for the Representation of Pro Se Litigants; 24 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Pro Bono Program for the Representation of Pro 25 Se Litigants in the United States District Court for the District of Nevada, attached hereto, is 26 adopted. 1 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court’s Pro Bono Committee is directed to maintain 2 statistics measuring program activity and submit annual reports to the Judges of this District. 3 DATED this 18th Day of October 2021. 4 _________________________ 5 MIRANDA M. DU, CHIEF JUDGE 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 2 1 PRO BONO PROGRAM FOR THE REPRESENTATION OF 2 PRO SE LITIGANTS IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 4 The United States District Court for the District of Nevada (“Court”) adopts the following 5 Pro Bono Program (“Program”) for furnishing representation to pro se litigants in matters where 6 the Court exercises its discretion to provide such representation. See 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, et seq. 7 and 28 U.S.C. § 1915. This Program shall govern the appointment of attorneys to represent pro 8 se litigants. For each civil action commenced by such litigant, any District Judge or Magistrate 9 Judge to whom the action is assigned may issue an order of appointment and other orders 10 relating to representation by the appointed attorney in accordance with this Program. The Court, 11 through a Pro Bono Committee and designated Pro Bono Liaison, will work in conjunction with 12 the Legal Aid Center of Southern Nevada, Washoe Legal Services, Nevada Legal Services, and 13 the Federal Bar Association of the District of Nevada to administer the Program. The designated 14 Pro Bono Liaison (“Liaison”) for the District of Nevada is: 15 Mai Tieu Pro Bono Liaison 16 333 Las Vegas Boulevard South, Suite 3005 17 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 702.464.5540 18 19 Volunteer lawyers provide an extremely valuable service, which enhances our legal 20 system. Pro bono representation can be a rewarding and enlightening experience. The Court is 21 grateful to the volunteer lawyers who provide their time and resources to preserve access to 22 justice for those unable to afford an attorney. 23 SECTION 1. APPOINTMENT 24 (a) Referral to the Program. 25 (1) Timing. At any time during the course of litigation, an assigned Judge may refer the 26 case to the Program for the appointment of pro bono counsel. Referral to the Program is 27 3 1 not an endorsement of the merits of the case. Whether to refer a case for appointment is 2 discretionary and generally based on a number of factors, including but not limited to: 3 A. the inability of the pro se party to retain counsel by other means; 4 B. the potential merit of the claims as set forth in the pleadings; 5 C. the nature and complexity of the action, both factual and legal, including the need 6 for factual investigation, the need for expert/s, and the overall needs of discovery; 7 D. the presence of conflicting testimony calling for a lawyer’s presentation of evidence 8 and cross-examination; 9 E. whether the pro se party has another case pending before the Court and, if so, 10 whether counsel has been appointed in such case; 11 F. the capability of the pro se party to present the case; 12 G. the degree to which the interests of justice will be served by appointment of 13 counsel, including the benefit the Court may derive from the assistance of 14 appointed counsel; 15 H. whether reasonable costs and attorney’s fees may be recoverable by the prevailing 16 party in the action; 17 I. the degree to which it appears an early ADR procedure, such as a settlement 18 conference or early neutral evaluation under Local Rule 16, may bring about an 19 early, inexpensive and consensual resolution of the litigation by: 20 (i) facilitating or improving communications between the parties; 21 (ii) providing the parties an opportunity to be heard regarding their 22 respective grievances, positions, concerns, goals and interests; 23 (iii) promoting the parties’ understanding of the strengths and weaknesses 24 of their respective cases; 25 (iv) limiting, narrowing or simplifying the issues in dispute; 26 (v) restoring or preserving personal or business relations; 27 (vi) otherwise creating an atmosphere conducive to settlement; 4 1 (vii) achieving settlement on terms not available through litigation; or 2 (viii) achieving settlement of some or all issues as between some or all 3 parties; and 4 J. any other factors deemed appropriate by the referring Judge. 5 (2) Scope of Appointment. Cases may be referred to the Program for either general 6 purpose or limited purpose representation. Limited purpose representation will normally, 7 though not necessarily, correlate to representation for purposes of participating in an 8 Alternative Dispute Resolution proceeding under Local Rule 16, including early mediation 9 conferences in Section 1983 prisoner litigation. 10 11 (b) Appointment. Upon referral by a Judge to the Program, the case will be sent to the 12 Pro Bono Liaison. The Liaison will gather pertinent materials, including copies of all 13 necessary filings in the case, and forward them to Legal Aid Center of Southern Nevada 14 or Washoe Legal Services who, in turn, will screen the litigant for financial eligibility 15 and will attempt to locate counsel willing to take on the pro bono representation. 16 17 (c) Appointment Response Form. Within thirty (30) days after pro bono counsel accepts 18 an appointment, counsel shall complete and return to the Liaison the Pro Bono Response 19 Form, indicating: “Representation of [pro se litigant’s name] for [type of appointment (i.e. 20 “the limited purpose of” or “All Purposes”)] is accepted.” Pro bono counsel shall also 21 indicate that he/she has conferred with the litigant and that the litigant agrees to the 22 representation. Should a pro se litigant determine not to accept representation by pro 23 bono counsel, the Response Form shall so indicate. The decision by a pro se litigant not 24 to participate in the Program may preclude further participation in the Program on the 25 specific case for which representation was refused. It does not preclude the possibility of 26 future participation in the Program in a different case. 27 5 1 2 (d) Order of Appointment. Upon receipt of the Appointment Response Form, the Liaison 3 will forward the form along with a proposed order appointing pro bono counsel to the 4 referring Judge. Absent unusual circumstances, pro bono counsel is expected to remain 5 as counsel for the duration of the purpose of the appointment. Docketing of the order 6 appointing pro bono counsel shall result in the setting of a public PROBONO case flag. 7 Appointment under this Program does not extend to the appeal, if any, of a final decision, 8 which shall be the responsibility of the client. 9 10 (e) Notice of Completion of Pro Bono Appointment. The Notice of Completion Form 11 is critical to the Program’s success, the accuracy of case records, and the quality of 12 service to pro se litigants. The Form shall be submitted within fourteen (14) days after 13 completion of legal services rendered by pro bono counsel to the Liaison. 14 15 (f) Record of Attorney Appointments. The Liaison, in conjunction with Legal Aid Center 16 of Southern Nevada and Washoe Legal Services, will maintain a record of appointments 17 and provide an annual written report to the Pro Bono Committee and Chief District Judge. 18 19 (g) Waiver of CM/ECF Fees. Attorneys who have taken on the pro bono representation 20 shall not be charged fees for use of the Court’s electronic filing system (PACER) in the 21 case on which they are serving as pro bono counsel. 22 23 (h) Liability Insurance. Participating attorneys will be eligible for professional errors and 24 omissions insurance coverage provided by Legal Aid Center of Southern Nevada or 25 Washoe Legal Services, to the extent such coverage is available. 26 27 6 1 (i) Business Entities Not Eligible. Business entities are not eligible for participation in 2 the Program. 3 (j) Pro Hac Vice. Attorneys who file for pro hac vice status will not be charged the petition 4 filing fee in a case where they are serving as pro bono counsel. 5 6 SECTION 2. EXPENSES 7 8 (a) Reimbursement of Reasonable Expenses. An attorney assigned pursuant to the 9 Program to represent a party in a proceeding before this Court may apply for 10 reimbursement from the Court Fund of reasonable, eligible expenses not paid by the 11 party. Before seeking reimbursement of costs, pro bono counsel must seek payment from 12 the party to the extent feasible. The “Court Fund” consists of an annual allowance made 13 by the District of Nevada’s Attorney Admission Fund to the Pro Bono Committee to use 14 in the Committee’s discretion for reimbursement of eligible costs on a pro rata basis. 15 16 (b) Advancement of Expenses. The assigned attorney or firm may, but is not required 17 to, advance the payment of expenses. Assigned counsel or the firm with which counsel 18 is affiliated may advance part or all of the payment of any such expenses without requiring 19 that the counsel or firm remain ultimately liable for such expenses. In appropriate 20 circumstances, the Pro Bono Committee may approve an advance of costs requested by 21 pro bono counsel. 22 23 (c) Expenses Eligible for Reimbursement from the Court Fund. 24 1. Deposition and Transcript Costs. Except as otherwise ordered by the Court, the 25 cost of the original of any transcript or deposition together with the cost of one copy 26 each where needed by counsel and, for deposition, the copy provided to the Court 27 shall be eligible for reimbursement. 7 1 2. Travel Expenses. Reasonable costs of travel, of more than 50 but less than 200 2 miles, by privately owned automobile are eligible for reimbursement at the rate 3 currently prescribed for federal judiciary employees who use a private automobile 4 for conduct of official business (“Reimbursed Vehicle Rate”), plus parking fees, 5 tolls, and similar expenses, provided, however, that if the cost of a vehicle rental 6 plus fuel (“Rental Vehicle Rate”) is less expensive than the Reimbursed Vehicle 7 Rate, reimbursement shall be capped at the Rental Vehicle Rate, plus parking 8 fees, tolls, and similar expenses. Reasonable costs for transportation other than 9 by privately owned automobile may be claimed on an actual expense basis. Actual 10 expenses reasonably incurred shall be guided by the prevailing limitations placed 11 upon travel and subsistence expenses of federal judiciary employees in 12 accordance with existing government travel regulations. 13 3. Service of Papers; Witness Fees. Fees for service of papers and the appearances 14 of witnesses that are not otherwise avoided, waived, or recoverable are eligible for 15 reimbursement. 16 4. Interpreter Services. Reasonable costs of interpreter services not otherwise 17 avoided, waived, or recoverable are eligible for reimbursement. The fees/rates are 18 subject to a reasonableness standard and may not exceed the hourly rate 19 established by the Criminal Justice Act. 20 5. Experts. Reasonable costs for expert services, other than interpreters, not 21 otherwise avoided, waived, or recoverable, are eligible for reimbursement. 22 6. Expenses Ineligible for Reimbursement from the Court Fund. General office 23 expenses, including personnel costs, rent, telephone services, secretarial help, 24 and photocopying, are not reimbursable from the Court Fund. Any costs incurred 25 in conducting computer assisted legal research is not reimbursable from the Court 26 Fund. The expense of printing briefs, regardless of the printing method utilized, is 27 not reimbursable from the Court Fund. 8 1 /// 2 /// 3 (d) Limits for Reimbursements. 4 1. Types of Actions. Only those expenses associated with the preparation of a civil 5 action in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada shall be eligible for 6 reimbursement. For clarity, costs associated with the preparation or presentation 7 of an appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals or the U.S. Supreme Court shall not be 8 reimbursed from the District Court Fund. Reimbursement from the Court Fund may 9 be limited by funds available. 10 2. Dollar Limits. To the extent the represented party is unable to bear all or part of the 11 costs of litigation, advances plus reimbursements are limited to $7,500 in 12 aggregate. 13 14 (e) Procedures for Obtaining Reimbursement or Advance. 15 1. Reimbursement. A request for reimbursement must be made by application to the 16 Pro Bono Committee for reasonable expenses not paid by the litigant. All requests 17 must be submitted through the Liaison. Requests may be made at any time after 18 the expense has been paid and during the pendency of the proceedings and up to 19 thirty days following the entry of judgment in the proceedings. The request shall 20 set forth the reason for the request and the amount of the expense, as well as any 21 expenses that have already been advanced and/or reimbursed in the action on 22 behalf of the party. The Committee may condition approval of such requests 23 subject to the availability of funds at the time of the request. 24 2. Advance. A request for an advance disbursement to cover an expense must be 25 made by application to the Pro Bono Committee. All requests for preapproval and 26 advancement must be submitted through the Liaison. The request shall set forth 27 the reason for the request and the estimated amount of the expense, as well as 9 1 any expenses that have already been advanced and/or reimbursed in the action 2 on behalf of the party. The Committee may condition approval of such requests 3 subject to the availability of funds at the time of the request. 4 3. Format. Any request made under this Section 2 may be made ex parte, and shall 5 include the voucher form approved by the Committee and available on the Court’s 6 website. The request shall be accompanied by sufficient documentation to permit 7 a determination that the request is appropriate and reasonable, and if the expense 8 has already been paid. 9 10 (f) Repayment to the Court Fund. To the extent a party assigned counsel under the 11 Program obtains a monetary award through settlement, final judgment, or an award of 12 taxable costs or attorney fees; the party shall reimburse the Court Fund as follows: 13 1. Repayment Limits in case of Settlement or Judgment. If a party settles or obtains 14 a judgment in excess of the party’s previous reimbursement from the Court Fund, 15 full repayment to the Court Fund is required. If a party settles or obtains judgment 16 in an amount that is less than the previously approved reimbursement, the Court 17 Fund shall be repaid at a rate of 50 cents on the dollar in an amount not to exceed 18 fifty percent (50%) of the total settlement or judgment. 19 2. Amounts to be Repaid from Cost or Attorney Fee Award. Where a party prevails 20 and is awarded taxable costs or attorney fees, the Court Fund shall be repaid in 21 full, first from the cost award and then from the attorney fees award, not to exceed 22 the total amount of the awards. 23 24 (g) Extraordinary Expenses. If pro bono counsel has incurred expenses of an 25 extraordinary nature, and after exhausting the maximum amount reimbursable from the 26 Court Fund as set forth in paragraph 2(d)(1) above, counsel may apply to the Attorney 27 10 1 Admission Fund of the District of Nevada for additional reimbursement. Any such 2 application by counsel must: 3 1. demonstrate that the expenses are extraordinary and not an expense typically 4 incurred by counsel in the handling of a pro bono assignment, such as those costs 5 identified in Section 2(c), or if the expense is of a type listed in Section 2(c), that 6 the amount in excess of $7,500 was essential to effective representation of the pro 7 bono client; 8 2. be accompanied by the presiding judge’s determination that the extraordinary 9 costs for which pro bono counsel seeks reimbursement were reasonable and 10 necessary; and, 11 3. provide documentation by pro bono counsel that the client represented is unable 12 to reimburse pro bono counsel for the extraordinary expenses for which 13 reimbursement is sought. 14 The AAF Committee will then make a recommendation as to whether to grant the pro 15 bono counsel’s application for reimbursement of extraordinary costs, which will be placed 16 on the agenda of the next quarterly judges’ meeting. 17 18 SECTION 3. COMPENSATION FOR SERVICES 19 (a) Upon appropriate application, the Judge may award attorney fees against an opposing 20 party for services rendered in the action as authorized under applicable statutes, 21 regulations, rules, or other provisions of law, and as the Judge deems just and proper 22 considering the applicable legal standards. 23 24 (b) If, after appointment, the appointed attorney discovers the party, due to changed 25 circumstances, is no longer financially eligible as originally determined pursuant to 26 Section 1(b), the attorney shall bring this information to the attention of the assigned 27 Judge, who may thereupon (i) approve a fee arrangement, including a contingency 11 1 fee arrangement, between the party and the appointed attorney, or (ii) relieve the 2 attorney from the responsibilities of the order of appointment and permit the party to 3 retain an attorney or proceed pro se. 4 5 (c) Nothing in these rules shall preclude or limit appointed counsel and the pro se litigant 6 from entering into a contingency fee agreement, subject to any legal and ethical 7 obligations, at the outset of the appointment. Except as provided in subsection (b) of 8 this section, any such agreement shall be made within the time frame for submitting 9 the Appointment Response Form, which shall indicate that a contingency fee 10 agreement is in place. In the case of a contingency agreement or other arrangement 11 made under this subsection or subsection (b), appointed pro bono counsel is not 12 eligible for advancement or reimbursement of costs or expenses from the Court Fund. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 12
Official source: https://www.nvd.uscourts.gov/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/GO-2019-07-Second-Amended-10-18-20 · retrieved 2026-07-23