(a) Motions seeking reconsideration of case-dispositive orders are governed by Fed.
R. Civ. P. 59 or 60, as applicable. A party seeking reconsideration under this rule
must state with particularity the points of law or fact that the court has overlooked
or misunderstood. Changes in legal or factual circumstances that may entitle the
movant to relief also must be stated with particularity. The court possesses the
inherent power to reconsider an interlocutory order for cause, so long as the court
retains jurisdiction. Reconsideration also may be appropriate if (1) there is newly
discovered evidence that was not available when the original motion or response
was filed, (2) the court committed clear error or the initial decision was manifestly
unjust, or (3) if there is an intervening change in controlling law.
(b) Motions for reconsideration are disfavored. A movant must not repeat arguments
already presented unless (and only to the extent) necessary to explain controlling,
intervening law or to argue new facts. A movant who repeats arguments will be
subject to appropriate sanctions.
(c) Motions for reconsideration must be brought within a reasonable time. Lack of
diligence or timeliness may result in denial of the motion.
