The Law Mind

Adoption of the Court's Modified Jury Plan (15-MC-04-42)

D.N.M. Standing Order — Adoption of the Court's Modified Jury Plan (15-MC-04-42)

Case 1:15-mc-00004 Document 42 Filed 10/27/15 Page 1 of 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO IN THE MATTER OF: ADOPTION OF MISC No. 15-MC-04-42 COURT’S MODIFIED JURY PLAN ORDER ADOPTING MODIFIED JURY PLAN This Order Adopting the Modified Jury Plan replaces the Court’s Miscellaneous Order No. 08-MC-04-40, filed December 2, 2008, which is hereby rescinded. With the concurrence of the active Article III Judges in the District, this Order is entered for the Court. IT IS ORDERED that the attached Jury Selection Plan (“the Plan”) is adopted by the United States District Court for the District of New Mexico in accordance with the Jury Selection and Service Act of 1968, as amended, 28 U.S.C. § 1861, et seq. (the “Act”). DATED at Albuquerque, this 27th day of October, 2015. FOR THE COURT: ______________________________________ M. CHRISTINA ARMIJO CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case 1:15-mc-00004 Document 42-1 Filed 10/27/15 Page 1 of 5 JURY SELECTION PLAN The following Jury Selection Plan (the “Plan”) is adopted by the United States District Court for the District of New Mexico in accordance with the Jury Selection and Service Act of 1968, as amended, 28 U.S.C. § 1861, et seq. (the “Act”). 1. Declaration of Policy It is the policy of the United States District Court for the District of New Mexico (the “Court”) that all litigants in the Court entitled to trial by jury will have the right to grand juries and petit juries selected at random from a fair cross section of the community in each jury division and that all qualified registered voters will have the opportunity to be considered for service on grand juries and petit juries and will have an obligation to serve as jurors when summoned for that purpose. No qualified person will be excluded from the opportunity to serve as a grand juror or as a petit juror because of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, or economic status. 2. Jury Divisions The Court finds that establishing within the District jury divisions, composed of counties from which jurors will be drawn for each place of holding court, will result in impartial trials, will avoid unnecessary expense, and will reduce burdens on persons reporting for jury service. The Court, therefore, establishes petit jury and grand jury divisions. a. Petit Jury Divisions. There will be two petit jury divisions: (1) The Northern Division which includes Bernalillo, Cibola, Colfax, Curry, De Baca, Guadalupe, Harding, Los Alamos, McKinley, Mora, Quay, Rio Arriba, Roosevelt, San Juan, San Miguel, Sandoval, Santa Fe, Socorro, Taos, Torrance, Union, and Valencia Counties; and (2) The Southern Division which includes Catron, Chaves, Dona Aña, Eddy, Grant, Hidalgo, Lea, Lincoln, Luna, Otero, and Sierra Counties. b. Grand Jury Divisions. There will be two grand jury divisions: (1) The Northern Division which includes the same counties that are included in the Northern petit jury division; and (2) The Southern Division which includes the same counties that are included in the Southern petit jury division. 3. Management and Supervision of Jury Selection Process and the Plan The Clerk of the Court, any authorized deputy clerk, or any other person authorized by the Court to assist the Clerk, will manage the jury selection process and the Plan under the supervision of the Chief Judge of the Court or other active district judge designated by the Chief Judge. In the event the Chief Judge, or another judge designated by the Chief Judge, is unable to perform duties required by the Plan, those -1- Case 1:15-mc-00004 Document 42-1 Filed 10/27/15 Page 2 of 5 duties will be performed by the judge specified in 28 U.S.C. § 136(e). 4. Persons Eligible for Jury Service Persons who are named in voter registration lists maintained by each county in the State of New Mexico and who are qualified under the terms of the Plan will be eligible to be selected for jury service under a computerized random selection process. 5. Computerized Random Selection Process In each jury division, persons eligible for jury service will be selected randomly by a computer program to form, successively, the Master Jury Wheel and the Qualified Jury List. a. Master Jury Wheel (1) Formation and Duration. A two-year Master Jury Wheel will be emptied and refilled for each division by March of every odd-numbered year, and persons selected for inclusion in a Master Jury Wheel will be subject to being chosen for a Qualified Jury List and for jury service during the existence of the Master Jury Wheel, i.e., until it is replaced by a succeeding Master Jury Wheel. (2) Random Selection Procedure. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1861, all litigants "have the right to grand and petit jurors selected at random from a fair cross section of the community." A master jury wheel is created by selecting names at random from the voter registration lists. Then, names are randomly drawn periodically from the master jury wheel to receive juror qualification questionnaires and summonses to report for grand or petit jury service. Individuals’ answers to these questionnaires determine whether they are legally qualified and available to serve. If so, those individuals are expected to report pursuant to the court’s instructions and their names are added to the Qualified Jury List. If not, those individuals are notified not to report or are postponed to another time. All of the selections are carried out through a properly programmed electronic data processing system for pure randomized selection. The pure randomized process ensures that the mathematical odds of any single name being picked are substantially equal. (3) Proportionality. The number of names selected from the voter registration list of each county within a jury division will be such to ensure that each county in the jury division is substantially proportionately represented in the Master Jury Wheel that is being formed. (4) Numbers of Names Selected and Supplementation. The names of at least one thousand persons will be randomly selected to be placed initially in a Master Jury Wheel for the Northern Division, and the names of at least one thousand persons will be randomly selected to be placed initially in a Master Jury Wheel for the Southern Division. -2- Case 1:15-mc-00004 Document 42-1 Filed 10/27/15 Page 3 of 5 The Chief Judge, or other judge designated by the Chief Judge, may order that the names of additional persons be randomly selected and placed in the Master Jury Wheel for a division if that becomes necessary to assure an adequate number of names in a Master Jury Wheel. b. Qualified Jury List. (1) Formation and Duration. A Qualified Jury List for a division will be formed by including in it the names of all persons who the Clerk has not disqualified, exempted or excused, and the Qualified Jury List will continue in existence until it is replaced by a Qualified Jury List that will be drawn from a succeeding Master Jury Wheel. A Special Qualified Jury List may be created at the direction of the Court, for any division, portion of a division, or a combination of the divisions for the purposes of jury selection in a specific case or cases. The creation of such list will be accomplished by a purely randomized process in accordance with Section 5.a.(2) of this Plan. (2) Number of Names Drawn. Names in a Master Jury Wheel of a jury division will be randomly drawn as needed to form a Qualified Jury List for that jury division. (3) List of Names Drawn. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1864(a), the Clerk will prepare an alphabetical list of the names of the persons drawn from the Master Jury Wheel to form a Qualified Jury List. Except by written order of the Chief Judge, or other active judge designated by the Chief Judge, or as required by statute, the list of names drawn will not be disclosed to anyone other than the judges of the Court, the Clerk, or any other person authorized by the Court to assist the Clerk in management of the jury selection process. (4) Juror Qualification Forms. In accordance with 28 U.S.C.§ 1864(a), the Clerk will mail to each person whose name is drawn from the Master Jury Wheel, for the purpose of forming a Qualified Jury List, a juror qualification form prescribed by the Administrative Office of the United States Courts. (5) Summons for Additional Information. A person who fails to reply timely to a juror qualification form or who submits a reply requiring further investigation may, if necessary, be summoned for a personal interview by the Clerk in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1864(a). (6) Determination of Persons to be Included in a Qualified Jury List. The Clerk is authorized and directed under supervision of the Court to determine which persons should be included in a Qualified Jury List. A person whose name is in the Master Jury Wheel is presumed to be qualified to be in the Qualified Jury List, but may be omitted from the Qualified Jury List if the Clerk determines that the person does not satisfy the qualification requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 1865(b), or is statutorily exempted from service under 28 U.S.C. § 1863(b)(6), or is excused by the Clerk for one of the special reasons set forth in this -3- Case 1:15-mc-00004 Document 42-1 Filed 10/27/15 Page 4 of 5 Plan. Notice of persons who identify themselves as non-citizens through the juror qualification process will be provided to appropriate election officials for verifying voter registration eligibility. (7) Excuses for Special Reasons. (a) In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1863(b)(5)(A), the Court finds that jury service by a member of the following groups of persons would entail undue hardship or extreme inconvenience and an excuse from jury service would not be inconsistent with 28 U.S.C. § 1861 or 28 U.S.C. § 1862: i Persons over 70 years of age; ii Persons who have served as a grand juror or a petit juror in any federal court within the last two years; iii Other persons who show “undue hardship or extreme inconvenience as defined in 28 U.S.C. § 1869(j). The Clerk must excuse from jury service any member of these groups of persons who requests to be excused. (b) In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1863(b)(5)(B), the Clerk must excuse from jury service persons who are “volunteer safety personnel” and who request to be excused from jury service. (8) Temporary Excuses. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1866(c), the Clerk under supervision of the Court may temporarily excuse a person summoned for jury service because of undue hardship or extreme inconvenience. (9) Source of Jurors for Petit Jury Panels and Grand Jury Panels. The Qualified Jury List will be the source of persons who will be drawn randomly to report for assignment on petit jury panels and on grand jury panels. 6. Summoning of Jury Panels--One-Step Procedure Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1878, jurors are summoned and qualified in a single procedure, in lieu of the two separate procedures otherwise provided for by the Jury Selection and Service Act. 7. Disclosure of Names of Panel Members a. Petit Jurors (1) The Clerk may disclose the names drawn from the Qualified Jury List to form a Petit Jury Panel to the parties in a case upon request of a party; however, a judge may order that the names be kept confidential in any case in which the interests of justice require confidentiality. (2) Names of prospective and sitting petit jurors shall not be disclosed to the public or media outside open court, except upon order of the Court. A request for disclosure of petit juror names to the media or public must be made to the presiding judge. b. Grand Jurors The names of grand jurors drawn from the Qualified Jury List must not be -4- Case 1:15-mc-00004 Document 42-1 Filed 10/27/15 Page 5 of 5 disclosed to the public or maintained in a public record, unless the judge in charge of the grand jury orders disclosure for a demonstrated need based on a showing of exceptional circumstances. 8. Computer Services for Random Selections The Court authorizes and directs the Clerk to contract with a provider of computer services to operate a computer program to carry out this Plan. The Clerk will give the computer service provider written instructions for a computer program that will carry out the random selection features of the Plan. The Clerk must require the computer service provider to execute, under penalty of perjury, a declaration that the computer service provider has complied with the Clerk’s written instructions and that the computerized random selection procedures set forth in the Plan have been followed and carried out by the computer service provider in making computerized random selections. 9. Records The Clerk must keep in the permanent records of the Court a copy of the written instructions given to the computer service provider and the computer service provider’s sworn declaration of compliance with the instructions and the procedures of the Plan. 10. Effective Date The effective date of November 1, 2015 represents the date jurors will be drawn from the Master Wheel to form new Qualified Jury Lists under this Plan. APPROVAL BY JUDICIAL COUNCIL The amended Plan for Selection of Jurors, which revises the Plan heretofore approved for the United States District Court for the District of New Mexico, was approved by the Judicial Council of the Tenth Circuit pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1863(a) on October 27, 2015. -5- Case 1:15-mc-00004 Document 42-2 Filed 10/27/15 Page 1 of 1 District Version v6.1 LIVE DB https://ecf.nmd.circ10.dcn/cgi-bin/Dispatch.pl?116803942672628 Notices 1:15-mc-00004 Administrative Orders U.S. District Court District of New Mexico - Version 6.1 Notice of Electronic Filing The following transaction was entered on 10/28/2015 at 9:15 AM MDT and filed on 10/27/2015 Case Name: Administrative Orders Case Number: 1:15-mc-00004 Filer: Document Number: 42 Docket Text: ORDER: Adopting Modified Jury Plan (Attachments: # (1) Modified Jury Plan, # (2) Minutes of the Judicial Council of the Tenth Circuit)(ng) 1:15-mc-00004 Notice has been electronically mailed to: 1:15-mc-00004 Notice has been delivered by fax to: 1:15-mc-00004 Notice has been delivered by USPS to: The following document(s) are associated with this transaction: Document description:Main Document Original filename:n/a Electronic document Stamp: [STAMP dcecfStamp_ID=1167529506 [Date=10/28/2015] [FileNumber=7134916- 0] [979d063afa1609207aeee496bf9861b637fa59045c0c0631ec468ef15466b9e77b beb3c386967197de92f81b709f1bbb61ec32dd88ba10dc221d4ad53d01fa25]] Document description: Modified Jury Plan Original filename:n/a Electronic document Stamp: [STAMP dcecfStamp_ID=1167529506 [Date=10/28/2015] [FileNumber=7134916- 1] [9124dd7c216e6f9201cd896bc66247e2d7cfe47aa072c87bf4cdfab6760f7af73e f5743604c2606b6d650744615d16dff92e8ede375e47ffcb275145da7cd271]] Document description: Minutes of the Judicial Council Original filename:n/a Electronic document Stamp: [STAMP dcecfStamp_ID=1167529506 [Date=10/28/2015] [FileNumber=7134916- 2] [0a4539fe22b33014d7eef08024efffae0fe00217b29a1eacf988aa9bfabca39175 736f3d1f407dfa2e986f39c26c8221d7151967f5a71961cec6fa927c8ed6b4]] 1 of 1 10/28/2015 9:15 AM
Official source: https://www.nmd.uscourts.gov/sites/nmd/files/general-ordes/15-MC-04-42_Adoption%20of%20the · retrieved 2026-07-23