IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
BRYSON CITY DIVISION
CHARLOTTE
DOCKET NO.
[Case Caption goes here]
CERTIFICATION AND REPORT OF F.R.C.P 26(f) CONFERENCE
AND PROPOSED DISCOVERY PLAN
1. Certification of Conference. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f), a meeting was held
on 12-12-2008 between :
2. Pre-Discovery Disclosures.
✔
The information required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1) will be exchanged by
12-12-2008.
The parties stipulate out of or object to mandatory initial disclosures.
3. Brief Statement of the Nature and Complexity of the Case.
4. Case Management Track.
✔
The parties jointly request that this matter be assigned to the
Complex/Extended
Standard Track. Track. If this case management track is assigned,
the discovery completion deadline would be 12-12-2008 and the
dispositive motions deadline would be 12-12-2008.
The parties disagree as to the appropriate case management track.
(Check if applicable and explain below.) Identify any anticipated conflicts
(including personal or professional obligations, family or medical leave, or
vacation that has been secured in advance) upon which any party or
counsel would seek to have the discovery period extended by a reasonable
period of not more than eight (8) weeks and/or the trial setting continued
not more than one (1) complete motions/trial calendar cycle beyond that
which otherwise would be justified based solely on the nature and
complexity of the case:
2
5. Discovery Plan. The parties jointly propose to the Court the following discovery
deadlines and limitations.
(a) Deadline for motions to join additional parties or otherwise amend the
pleadings: 12-12-2008.
(b) Discovery Limits:
1) party.
Maximum of [#] interrogatories per party.
2) Maximum of [#] requests for production per party.
party.
3) Maximum of [#] requests for admission per party.
party.
4) party.
Maximum of [#] hours of oral deposition per party.
(c) Expert reports from retained experts under Rule 26(a)(2) will be due:
- from plaintiff(s) by 12-12-2008;
- from defendant(s) by 12-12-2008;
Supplementations under Rule 26(e) due [list dates or time intervals] .
(d) Special Issues Regarding the Scope and Schedule of Discovery. (Note that
in cases complex enough to warrant the bifurcation of discovery or other
proceedings, the parties may propose separate phases of discovery,
provided that the aggregate amount of time allocated to all phases of
discovery does not exceed the total number of weeks permitted for
discovery given the appropriate case management track.)
[Discuss whether discovery should be conducted in phases and/or
limited to or focused on particular issues, etc.]
(e) Objections:
[Discuss any objections to or disagreement over the discovery
deadlines and limitations indicated above.]
3
6. Other Items.
(a) Initial Pretrial Conference. The parties request
do not request a conference
conference with with
the Court prior to the entry of a Case Management Order.
(b) Alternative Dispute Resolution.
Based upon preliminary discussions, settlement in this case
cannot yet be adequately evaluated. The prospect of settlement may be
enhanced by use of the following ADR procedure:
✔ Mediated Settlement Conference
Judicial Settlement Conference
Binding Arbitration
Other: [Please Identify]
The parties agree that the above-selected ADR procedure would be most
useful if conducted:
✔
Prior to further discovery.
After an initial round of preliminary discovery to be completed by
12-12-2008.
After the completion of discovery.
(c) Trial Estimates. If this case is ultimately tried, trial is expected to take
approximately [length of time]. This case will be tried without a jury.
with a jury.
(e) Local Civil Rule 73.1(C) Certification.
The parties have discussed the issue of consent to the jurisdiction
of a U.S. magistrate judge. If unanimous consent is present, file an
executed Joint Stipulation of Consent form (WDNC Form 34)
contemporaneously with the CIAC or else the option to consent
may be deemed waived as untimely.
7. Please identify any other matters regarding discovery or case management which
may require the Court’s attention (e.g., concerns re: confidentiality, privilege, and
electronically stored information):
4
s\
__________________________________ s\
__________________________________
Attorney for Plaintiff(s): Plaintiff(s):
Attorney for Plaintiff(s):
s\
__________________________________ s\
__________________________________
Attorney for Plaintiff(s):
Plaintiff(s) Attorney for Plaintiff(s):
Plaintiff(s):
s\
__________________________________ s\
__________________________________
Attorney for Plaintiff(s):
Plaintiff(s): Attorney for Plaintiff(s):
Plaintiff(s):
s\
__________________________________ s\
__________________________________
Attorney for Plaintiff(s):
Plaintiff(s): Attorney for Plaintiff(s):
Plaintiff(s):
