The Law Mind

Joint General Order 2024-02 Amendments to Joint Local Rules

W.D. Ky. Standing Order — Joint General Order 2024-02 Amendments to Joint Local Rules

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN AND WESTERN DISTRICTS OF KENTUCKY JOINT GENERAL ORDER No. 2024-02 IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO JOINT LOCAL RULES * * * * * Pursuant to LR 83.14 and LCrR 57.7 of the Joint Local Rules of the Eastern and Western Districts of Kentucky, and pursuant to the authority granted by Rule 83 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Rule 57 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, upon recommendation of the Joint Local Rules Commission, and in the absence of any comments after Notice, the Judges of the Eastern and Western Districts hereby ORDER that the following amendments be made to the Joint Local Rules: A. LR 81.1 Removal Procedures; Supplemental Filing of State Court Record and Procedure for Pending State Court Motions – is adopted as follows in order to provide local rules governing removal procedures, supplementing the requirement under 28 U.S.C. § 1446(a) (requiring the filing of “all process, pleadings and orders served upon” the removing party), and under the authority of 28 U.S.C. § 1447(b) (authorizing the district court to “require the removing party to file with its clerk copies of all records and proceedings” from the state court): LR 81.1 Removal Procedures; Supplemental Filing of State Court Record and Procedure for Pending State Court Motions (a) Supplemental Filing of State Court Record. When removing an action from state court, within 30 days following the filing of a Notice of Removal, the removing party must electronically file any portion of the state court record it considers relevant to the removed action that the removing party did not file at the time of removal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1446(a). When filing any additional portions of the state court record, the removing party shall organize them in chronological order by state court filing date, shall include a clear and concise description of each attachment in the description field of each attachment, and shall also file the state court docket sheet. 1 (b) Obligation to Refile Pending State Court Motions. If any motion remains pending in state court at the time of removal, and if the movant wishes the District Court to rule on the motion, the party that initially filed the motion must refile the motion in the District Court case within 14 days after removal. Unless already fully briefed, Responses and Replies shall be filed in accordance with LR 7.1. B. LR 7.1.1 Disclosure Statement – is adopted as follows in order to require citizenship information for certain entities in diversity actions: LR 7.1.1 Disclosure Statement (a) Additional Parties Who Must File Disclosure Statements. In diversity actions, any party, intervenor, or proposed intervenor that is a limited liability company (LLC), a limited liability partnership (LLP), a limited partnership (LP), or a partnership must, in the disclosure statement required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1, list those states from which the owners/members/partners of the LLC, LLP, LP, or partnership are citizens. If any owner/member/partner of the LLC, LLP, LP, or partnership is another LLC, LLP, LP, or partnership, then the disclosure statement must also list those states from which the owners/members/partners of the LLC, LLP, LP, or partnership are citizens. C. LR 83.2(a) and LCrR 57.2(a) Pro Hac Vice fees – is amended as follows in order to address the recent addition of renewal fees in the Western District of Kentucky: (a) Procedure. An attorney who has not been admitted to the Bar of the Court may represent parties before the Court if the attorney has paid the prescribed pro hac vice admission fee to the Clerk of the Court, has been granted leave by the Court to appear pro hac vice in a particular case, and pays any applicable renewal fee. A separate motion for each attorney requesting pro hac vice admission must include the following information: D. LR 16.2 – Confidentiality of Settlement Conference – is amended as follows to confirm, expressly, that the ADR process is confidential: LR 16.2 Alternative Dispute Resolution Upon motion of any party, or sua sponte, any judicial officer may require parties in civil cases to consider some form of alternative dispute resolution process (“ADR”), including but not limited to, mediation, early neutral evaluation, minitrial, or arbitration, as follows: (a) Mediation may be conducted under the auspices of a private professional mediator or a judicial officer. (b) All communications in ADR proceedings are confidential, they are not subject to discovery, and such communications may not be disclosed to anyone other than the parties and ADR participants. 2 ENTERED JAMES J. VILT JR., CLERK 8/1/2024 U.S. DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY
Official source: https://www.kywd.uscourts.gov/sites/kywd/files/general-ordes/Joint%20General%20Order%2024- · retrieved 2026-07-23