The Law Mind

Individual Practices — Judge Display

N.D. Ill. Judge Practices (Judge Display) · Judge Display

Home --> Test : www.ilnd.uscourts.gov --> Home Judges --> Test : www.ilnd.uscourts.gov --> Judges expand_more Judicial Absence --> Judicial Absence Motion Schedule --> Motion Schedule Mediation Program for the Western Division --> Mediation Program for the Western Division Rules --> Test : www.ilnd.uscourts.gov --> Rules expand_more Local Rules --> Local Rules Federal Rules --> Federal Rules Internal Operating Procedures --> Internal Operating Procedures Internal Operating Procedures (PDF) --> Internal Operating Procedures (PDF) General Orders --> General Orders Alternative Dispute Resolution (Western Division) --> Alternative Dispute Resolution (Western Division) Pattern Jury Instructions --> Pattern Jury Instructions Local Rule 78.5 Request for Decision/Status Report --> Local Rule 78.5 Request for Decision/Status Report Mediation Program for the Western Division --> Mediation Program for the Western Division Local Rules for ADR --> Local Rules for ADR Clerk's Office --> Test : www.ilnd.uscourts.gov --> Clerk's Office expand_more Operations --> Operations Judicial Support --> Judicial Support Information Systems --> Information Systems Administrative Services --> Administrative Services Human Resources --> Human Resources Attorney --> Test : www.ilnd.uscourts.gov --> Attorney CM/ECF --> Test : www.ilnd.uscourts.gov --> CM/ECF expand_more Register for CM/ECF --> Register for CM/ECF CM/ECF User Guide --> CM/ECF User Guide CM/ECF Quick Reference Guide --> CM/ECF Quick Reference Guide CM/ECF Training Videos --> CM/ECF Training Videos CM/ECF Password Reset Request --> CM/ECF Password Reset Request General Order on Electronic Case Filing --> General Order on Electronic Case Filing Written Opinions --> Written Opinions Recently Filed Cases --> Recently Filed Cases Access to CM/ECF for the Northern District of Illinois --> Access to CM/ECF for the Northern District of Illinois Daily Calendars --> Test : www.ilnd.uscourts.gov --> Daily Calendars Jurors --> Test : www.ilnd.uscourts.gov --> Jurors MDL --> Test : www.ilnd.uscourts.gov --> MDL Forms --> Test : www.ilnd.uscourts.gov --> Forms Pro Se / Representing Yourself --> Test : www.ilnd.uscourts.gov --> Pro Se / Representing Yourself expand_more Pro Se Forms --> Pro Se Forms Federal Civil Case Forms --> Federal Civil Case Forms Guide to Filing a Case in Federal Court Without an Attorney --> Guide to Filing a Case in Federal Court Without an Attorney Guide to Understanding the Federal Courts --> Guide to Understanding the Federal Courts Settlement Assistance Program --> Settlement Assistance Program Settlement Assistance Program Appearance Form --> Settlement Assistance Program Appearance Form Illinois Legal Aid Online – Pro Se Resources --> Illinois Legal Aid Online – Pro Se Resources Pro Se Filer PDF Submissions --> Pro Se Filer PDF Submissions Receive Notices of Electronic Filings by Email --> Receive Notices of Electronic Filings by Email William J. Hibbler Memorial Pro Se Assistance Program Help Desk --> William J. Hibbler Memorial Pro Se Assistance Program Help Desk Schedule an Appointment with the Hibbler Help Desk --> Schedule an Appointment with the Hibbler Help Desk Media --> Test : www.ilnd.uscourts.gov --> Media Naturalization, Civics Education & Community Outreach --> Test : www.ilnd.uscourts.gov --> Naturalization, Civics Education & Community Outreach expand_more Civics Education --> Civics Education Court History Documentary --> Court History Documentary Naturalization Ceremony --> Naturalization Ceremony Court History Museum --> Court History Museum Court Lectures --> Court Lectures About the Court --> Test : www.ilnd.uscourts.gov --> About the Court expand_more History of the Court --> History of the Court Proper forms of identification and items not allowed in Courthouses. --> Proper forms of identification and items not allowed in Courthouses. Divisional County Map --> Divisional County Map Careers --> Test : www.ilnd.uscourts.gov --> Careers close Home » Judges » Judge Information District Judges Magistrate Judges Emergency Judges Order Transcript Judge Alexakis Alonso Appenteng Aspen Bass Ehler Berry III Blakey Bucklo Chang Coleman Cummings Daniel Dow Jr. Durkin Ellis Fuentes Gettleman Gilbert Gottschall Guzman Harjani Holleb Hotaling Hunt Iasparro Jantz Jenkins Johnston Kendall Kennelly Kim Kness Kocoras Lefkow McLaughlin McNally McShain Pacold Pallmeyer Perry Reinhard Rowland Schneider Seeger Shah Tharp Jr. Valderrama Valdez Weisman Wood Select Judge Alexakis Alonso Appenteng Aspen Bass Ehler Berry III Blakey Bucklo Chang Coleman Cummings Daniel Dow Jr. Durkin Ellis Fuentes Gettleman Gilbert Gottschall Guzman Harjani Holleb Hotaling Hunt Iasparro Jantz Jenkins Johnston Kendall Kennelly Kim Kness Kocoras Lefkow McLaughlin McNally McShain Pacold Pallmeyer Perry Reinhard Rowland Schneider Seeger Shah Tharp Jr. Valderrama Valdez Weisman Wood Judge Andrea R. Wood meeting_room Courtroom: 2141 gavel Chambers: 2146 phone Telephone: (312) 435-5582 fax Fax: (312) 554-8529 error IMPORTANT NOTICE: Please direct all case-related inquiries, including scheduling, the status of motions, or the logistics of trial, to the Courtroom Deputy, Laritza Arcos ([email protected]) or (312) 702-8874. All parties should follow the procedures below until further notice: Motion practice : Until further notice, parties should not notice motions for presentment. Parties may request a hearing for motions that they believe cannot be decided based on written submissions alone or that would otherwise benefit from a court hearing. The request must be made in the motion itself or by joint e-mail to the courtroom deputy. For any motion the parties believe would benefit from briefing, the parties should jointly e-mail the Courtroom Deputy within 2 business days of the filing of the motion to request a briefing schedule. Please be advised that the Court may set a motion hearing or a briefing schedule for any motion without a request from the parties. Telephone hearings : Judge Wood holds most status hearings by telephone. Parties may consult the Court's daily call sheet to see if a hearing will be held telephonically or in person. Whether a hearing will take place telephonically or in person will also be stated in the docket entry setting the hearing. When participating in a hearing telephonically, do not use a speakerphone. A handset or headset should be used to ensure the clarity of audio input. If available, a landline is preferable to a cellphone. Participants should be in a quiet place, not in a vehicle, outdoors, or in a public area. While waiting for a case to be called, participants should mute their telephones to eliminate potentially disruptive background noise and feedback on the line while other matters are being heard. In addition, during a hearing participants should mute their telephones except when speaking. Parties are advised to consult the Court’s Best Practices for Remote Participation in Telephone / Videoconference Court Proceedings for additional guidance on participating in court hearings remotely. To ensure access to public court proceedings, members of the public and media may call-in to listen to telephonic hearings. Information on how to do so will be included on the docket and/or the call sheet. Counsel of record will receive a courtesy email the morning of the hearing is scheduled with instructions to join the call. error NOTICE Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings. Violation of these prohibitions may result in sanctions, including removal of court-issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the Court. error Important Information This page contains important information about Judge Wood’s case management procedures.  These procedures have been designed to facilitate the prompt, efficient, and equitable disposition of cases on Judge Wood’s docket. Please take the time to familiarize yourself with these procedures in addition to the Local Rules for this District. When Judge Wood’s procedures differ from the Local Rules, please follow the procedures outlined here. The success of these procedures depends on your willingness to familiarize yourself with them and to act accordingly. Counsel will be expected to explain fully any failure to comply with Judge Wood’s pretrial procedures, as well as applicable Local Rules. summarize Case Procedures event Calendar Schedule date_range Motion Schedule groups Chambers Staff Judge Andrea R. Wood --> Procedures to be followed in cases assigned to Judge Andrea R. Wood Bankruptcy Appeals chevron_right print For bankruptcy appeals, the Court will set a briefing schedule after the record has been compiled and transmitted pursuant to Fed. R. Bank. P. 8018. Cases Reassigned to Judge Andrea R. Wood chevron_right print The following procedure applies to cases that have been reassigned to Judge Wood after the parties have already appeared before the originally-assigned district court judge. Unless otherwise ordered, all previously-set hearing dates, deadlines, and schedules will remain in effect. Counsel for the parties shall confer and then prepare and file a joint Reassignment Status Report, not to exceed 5 pages, within 14 days of the order reassigning the case. If defense counsel has not yet filed an appearance, the Reassignment Status Report should be prepared by plaintiff’s counsel. A template for the Reassignment Status Report, setting forth the information required, may be found below. Initial Status Report For Reassigned Case      Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge chevron_right print Too often litigants are unaware of the efficiencies to be gained by having their cases tried before United States Magistrate Judges.  The court strongly encourages counsel to inform their clients of this option and to discuss it with opposing counsel.   Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge   Correspondence with the Court chevron_right print Unless the Court directs otherwise, counsel and pro se litigants must not communicate with the Court about the merits of a case by letter, phone, or email (excluding the submission of a proposed order). All communications and requests for relief must be made in the form of a motion, brief, or a status report, and served on opposing counsel. Courtesy Copies chevron_right print Unless the Court directs otherwise, no courtesy copies may be submitted for filing. If the Court orders a party to provide paper courtesy copies, please deliver those copies to the drop-box outside the Courtroom Deputy’s office (Room 2140). Discovery Motion Practice chevron_right print The Court believes that parties can and should work out most discovery disputes and thus discourages the filing of discovery motions. The Court will not hear or consider any discovery motion unless the movant has complied with the “meet and confer” requirement of Local Rule 37.2. The motion must state with specificity when and how the movant complied with Local Rule 37.2. Parties are reminded that compliance with Local Rule 37.2 requires a good faith effort to resolve discovery disputes and communication that takes place face to face or by telephone. The exchange of correspondence will not normally be sufficient to comply with Local Rule 37.2. All parties should be fully prepared to argue any discovery motion on the date that it is presented. The Court often will rule on discovery motions after hearing argument at the motion call and without briefing. If after hearing argument, the Court believes that the motion requires briefing, the Court normally will set an expedited briefing schedule so that the matter can be resolved promptly. Parties are reminded to notify the Court immediately if they are withdrawing any previously filed discovery motions. Parties are reminded that there is no “order” in which discovery must occur, and that one party’s failure or inability to respond to discovery will not excuse any other party’s prompt compliance. In addition, unless provided for under applicable law, the pendency of a dispositive motion does not, in itself, operate to stay discovery. Electronic Discovery Disputes If the parties have reached an impasse regarding the discovery of voluminous records from a database, server, computer, service provider or similar electronic storage facility (ESF), before a motion to compel is filed, the parties are required to meet and confer with an IT representative of the ESF to be searched in order to determine the most effective way to retrieve the requested material. The party seeking the discovery must also bring its IT specialist to this meeting in order to discuss the proper format for the retrieval of the records. This electronic discovery conference may take place in person or by telephone, and both sides should be prepared to discuss specifically the parameters of both the search and the ESF. For information regarding the Voluntary E-Mediation Program, please refer to: http://www.discoverypilot.com/content/e-mediation-program Emergency Motions chevron_right print Please be advised that the Court will hear emergency motions only in exceptional circumstances after making a preliminary determination of whether an actual emergency exists.  Emergency matters must be of such a nature that a delay in hearing them would cause serious harm to one or more of the parties. Requests to set a hearing on an emergency motion shall be made to the Courtroom Deputy, [email protected], with as much advance notice as possible. All reasonable efforts must be made to give actual notice to opposing counsel. Final Pretrial Orders chevron_right print For all civil trials, the Court will set a date in advance of trial by which the parties must file a joint final pretrial order. The final pretrial order must be signed by counsel for each party and filed electronically using CM/ECF, with two courtesy copies delivered to chambers. The final pretrial order must include the information detailed at the link below. Standing Order Regarding Final Pretrial Orders for Civil Trials Prospective Juror Letter Initial Status Conference and Joint Initial Status Report chevron_right print For most newly-filed civil cases, the Court will schedule an initial status hearing to take place approximately 60 days after the filing of the complaint. The parties are directed to meet and conduct a planning conference pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f). No later than seven calendar days before the initial status hearing, the parties shall file a Joint Initial Status Report, not to exceed five (5) pages in length. The Joint Initial Status Report shall provide the information listed in the template below. Joint Initial Status Report Motion Practice chevron_right print Until further notice, parties should  not  notice motions for presentment. Parties may request a hearing for motions that they believe cannot be decided based on written submissions alone or that would otherwise benefit from a court hearing. The request must be made in the motion itself or by joint e-mail to the courtroom deputy. For any motion the parties believe would benefit from briefing, the parties should jointly e-mail the Courtroom Deputy within 2 business days of the filing of the motion to request a briefing schedule. Please be advised that the Court may set a motion hearing or a briefing schedule for any motion without a request from the parties. Motions for Extensions of Time A party seeking an extension of time must contact all other parties in the case to determine whether they object to the extension. Any motion for extension of time must indicate whether it is the first or subsequent extension request, shall include the reasons for the request, any previous relief granted, and whether any other party objects to the extension. Joint, Agreed, and Uncontested Motions Joint, uncontested, and agreed motions should be so identified in both the title and body of the motion. If the motion is scheduled for a hearing, counsel for all parties are expected to be present regardless of whether the motion is opposed. Other Requirements Counsel should not respond to motions by correspondence with the Court. The Court strongly encourages counsel to convert electronic filings created with word-processing software into .pdf documents by printing or publishing to .pdfs, rather than manually scanning paper copies into .pdfs. The former method of conversion generates searchable optical character recognition (OCR) text; the latter does not. Patent Cases chevron_right print Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, all patent cases will be governed by the Local Patent Rules for the Northern District of Illinois. Local Patent Rules LPR Appendix A LPR Appendix B Estimated Patent Case Schedule Proposed Orders chevron_right print Parties are not required to submit proposed orders for routine motions, such as motions for extensions of time, or dispositive motions, such as motions for summary judgment. Proposed orders should not be filed directly onto the docket as stand-alone entries, even if the parties agree on the order. Instead, unless the Court has specifically directed otherwise, a party must file a motion asking the Court to enter the order. Even proposed orders such as stipulated protective orders require the Court’s approval before actually being given full effect and entered. Contemporaneously with filing a motion to enter a proposed order, the movant must e-mail the proposed order to  [email protected] . This will allow the Court to edit the order if necessary. The subject line of the e-mail must include the case number and name, the docket number of the corresponding motion, and the title of the order that is proposed. Attachments should be submitted to the Court in a format compatible with Word, which is a “Save As” option in most word processing software. Proposed orders should also be served on all parties. Pro Se Litigants chevron_right print Click here  for general information regarding Pro Se Litigants .    Individuals who make the serious decision to represent themselves are referred to by the Court as pro se litigants.  If you are a  pro se  litigant with a case in this district, the  District Court Self-Help Assistance Program  may be able to provide you with assistance regarding your case. The help desk attorney operates by appointment only. Appointments are made at the Clerk’s Office Intake Desk on the 20th floor or by calling 312-435-5691. Use of the help desk attorney is not a substitute for having a personal attorney, however.  You should seriously consider trying to obtain professional legal assistance.  Below are lists of organizations that may be able to offer you free or low-cost legal assistance or a referral to an attorney if you can afford to pay for legal services:  Free or low-cost legal services   Referral Services Please also refer to the following links for additional resources and information: Filing a Civil Case Without An Attorney: A Guide For The Pro Se Litigant   Local Rule 56.2 - Notice to Pro Se Litigants Opposing Summary Judgment The following links provide information that may be useful for appointed attorneys: Title VII and Section 1981: A Guide for Appointed Attorneys in the Northern District of Illinois   The Americans With Disabilities Act An Age Discrimination In Employment Act: A Guide for Appointed Attorneys in the Northern District of Illinois   Settlement chevron_right print The Court urges parties to undertake settlement negotiations at the earliest practicable point in the litigation. Parties who desire a settlement conference should request one in open court or by telephone call to the Courtroom Deputy. Settlement conferences usually will be referred to the assigned Magistrate Judge.   In the event that the parties seek to have this Court retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of a settlement agreement, counsel should review the following Seventh Circuit cases (among other pertinent authorities): Dupuy v. McEwen, 495 F.3d 807 (7th Cir. 2007); Blue Cross & Blue Shield Association v. American Express Co., 467 F.3d 634 (7th Cir. 2006); Shapo v. Engle, 463 F.3d 641 (7th Cir. 2006); and Lynch v. SamataMason Inc., 279 F.3d 487 (7th Cir. 2002). Summary Judgment Motions chevron_right print Motions for summary judgment and responses must comply with Local Rules 56.1(a) and 56.1(b), as well as the procedures outlined herein. All statements of undisputed material facts and their responses shall be filed separately from the memoranda of law and shall include the line, paragraph or page number where the supporting material may be found in the record. The Local Rules are not mere technicalities.  Failure to abide by the Local Rules may result in the Court striking briefs, disregarding statements of fact, deeming statements of fact admitted and denying summary judgment. See Cracco v. Vitran Exp., Inc., 559 F.3d 625, 632 (7th Cir. 2009). The movant shall not file more than 80 statements of undisputed material facts without prior leave of the Court. The respondent shall be limited to 40 statements of undisputed material facts without prior leave of the Court.  In complex cases, the Court may request that the parties submit a timeline of events in addition to the statements of undisputed material facts. If you are representing yourself, please refer to Local Rule 56.2 - Notice to Pro Se Litigants Opposing Summary Judgment. Transcripts chevron_right print Persons requesting daily copy and/or realtime feed transcripts of a trial or other evidentiary hearing that may reasonably be expected to last more than one day should contact Judge Wood's court reporter, Brenda Varney, at least five business days prior to the first day of such proceeding so that these services may be scheduled. A deposit may be required. All other transcript requests should be placed using the Court's online transcript order form, which can be found HERE . Brenda Varney may be reached at [email protected] or 312-554-8931. Select a date below to view all schedules. Thursday, July 23, 2026 5 cases expand_more Case No. Name Time Type 1:25-cv-02013 Tellat v. Modena Freight LLC 08:45AM Telephone Conference 1:24-cv-05631 UL LLC v. Callington 09:00AM Telephone Conference 1:26-cv-02749 NBCUniversal Media, LLC v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations I 09:30AM Telephone Conference 1:24-cv-03767 MacNeil IP LLC v. Harbor Freight Tools USA, Inc. 09:45AM Telephone Conference 1:25-cr-00026 USA v. Billings 10:00AM Change of Plea Hearing Friday, July 24, 2026 16 cases expand_more Case No. Name Time Type 1:22-cr-00110 USA v. Bell 09:00AM Telephone Conference 1:23-cv-03137 Central States Southeast & Southwest Areas Health v. Johnson 09:00AM Telephone Conference 1:25-cv-07434 Rocha v. Wayfair Inc. 09:00AM Telephone Conference 1:25-cv-14656 O'Grady v. Hastings 09:15AM Telephone Conference 1:25-cv-15278 Schneider v. Does 1-10 09:15AM Telephone Conference 1:26-cv-00667 Bibiano v. Chicagoland Commissary, LLC 09:15AM Telephone Conference 1:24-cv-03531 Estrada v. Alpha Lab Services, Inc. 09:30AM Telephone Conference 1:24-cv-10942 Bruns v. Northwestern Memorial Healthcare 09:30AM Telephone Conference 1:26-cv-02313 Spin Master Ltd. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations I 09:30AM Telephone Conference 1:25-cr-00193 USA v. Ali 09:45AM Telephone Conference 1:26-cv-00204 Deckers Outdoor Corporation v. A1Q8VDQXBCJ53I 09:45AM Telephone Conference 1:26-cv-05900 Bawa v. American Express National Bank 09:45AM Telephone Conference 1:15-cv-01439 Mays v. City Of Chicago 10:00AM Telephone Conference 1:26-cv-03463 Fendi S.R.L. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations I 10:00AM Telephone Conference 1:26-cv-05130 Kei & Chris LLC v. Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Ident 10:00AM Telephone Conference 1:25-cr-00505 USA v. McCamury 01:30PM Change of Plea Hearing Monday, July 27, 2026 6 cases expand_more Case No. Name Time Type 1:26-cv-04271 The College Company LLC v. The Partnerships Identified on Schedule A 08:45AM Telephone Conference 1:26-cv-06082 Hall v. Federal Express Corporation, s/b/m to FedEx Ground 08:45AM Telephone Conference 1:26-cv-04309 Robert Bosch GmbH v. The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability C 09:00AM Telephone Conference 1:26-cv-06167 The Northern Trust Company v. Dharod Family, LLC 09:00AM Telephone Conference 1:18-cv-03447 J.P. Morgan Securities LLC v. Black 09:15AM Telephone Conference 1:24-cv-12954 International Custom Element Design Factory, Inc. v. Abovo8 LLC 09:15AM Telephone Conference Tuesday, July 28, 2026 13 cases expand_more Case No. Name Time Type 1:24-cv-00751 Pawnee Leasing Corporation v. Mr. Munchies Food LLC 09:00AM Telephone Conference 1:24-cv-11279 Barfield v. City Of Chicago 09:00AM Telephone Conference 1:26-cv-02097 The Art Gallery Of Billy Jacobs, Ltd v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations I 09:15AM Telephone Conference 1:26-cv-02199 Kate Louise Powell v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations I 09:15AM Telephone Conference 1:25-cv-13679 Colon v. City of Chicago 09:30AM Telephone Conference 1:26-cv-04560 Katherine Sara O'Keefe v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations I 09:30AM Telephone Conference 1:25-cv-09517 Chavez v. Sam's West, Inc. 09:45AM Telephone Conference 1:26-cv-00802 General Motors LLC v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations I 09:45AM Telephone Conference 1:25-cv-00405 Soto v. PIM Brands, Inc. 10:00AM Telephone Conference 1:26-cv-02308 The Macneil Studio LTD. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations I 10:00AM Telephone Conference 1:25-cv-06948 Shark Properties, LLC v. American Family Insurance Company 10:15AM Telephone Conference 1:26-cv-05930 Smith v. Army and Airforce Exchange Service 10:15AM Telephone Conference 1:25-cr-00294 USA v. Montes-Robles 01:30PM Sentencing Wednesday, July 29, 2026 14 cases expand_more Case No. Name Time Type 1:25-cv-12712 Salt City Steel LLC v. The Partnerships Identified on Schedule A 08:45AM Telephone Conference 1:26-cv-00573 Clint Robert Padilla v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations I 08:45AM Telephone Conference 1:23-cv-02330 Shenzhen Wanfan Technology Co. Ltd. v. Orbital Structures Pty Ltd 09:00AM Telephone Conference 1:25-cv-10097 Smith v. United Airlines, Inc. 09:00AM Telephone Conference 1:22-cv-04425 Gulla v. Chicago State University 09:15AM Telephone Conference 1:25-cv-00023 Sampson, Jr v. Cook County 09:15AM Telephone Conference 1:26-cv-00642 Pita Ramirez v. Calvo 09:30AM Telephone Conference 1:26-cv-03116 Triumph International, LLC v. The Partnerships And Unincorporated Associations I 09:30AM Telephone Conference 1:25-cv-01642 Das v. Mahmudjon 09:45AM Telephone Conference 1:26-cv-03820 Celine SA v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations I 09:45AM Telephone Conference 1:25-cv-03180 Komori America Corporation v. Absolute Graphic Technologies USA, Inc. 10:00AM Telephone Conference 1:26-cv-02454 Huang v. The Defendant Identified On Schedule A 10:00AM Telephone Conference 1:26-cv-04802 Robert Bosch GmbH v. The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability C 10:15AM Telephone Conference 1:14-cr-00010 USA v. Hughes 02:00PM In Court Hearing Thursday, July 30, 2026 16 cases expand_more Case No. Name Time Type 1:26-cv-05543 Glitch Productions Pty Ltd v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations I 08:45AM Telephone Conference 1:26-cv-06316 Li v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations I 08:45AM Telephone Conference 1:25-cv-02481 Northwestern Memorial Healthcare v. Highmark Blue Cross Blue Shield 09:00AM Telephone Conference 1:25-cv-03614 Bettis v. Vance 09:00AM Telephone Conference 1:25-cv-06490 HongKong Yueqi Tech Limited v. The Individuals, Partnerships and Unincorporated A 09:15AM Telephone Conference 1:25-cv-10403 Erik Diedrichsen v. The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability C 09:15AM Telephone Conference 1:24-cv-06220 Lasisi v. Ulta Beauty Cosmetics, LLC. 09:30AM Telephone Conference 1:26-cv-04440 Ronces v. Sipchen #20714 09:30AM Telephone Conference 1:24-cv-07698 Burzawa v. Yardi Systems Inc. 09:45AM Telephone Conference 1:24-cv-11026 Joseph v. Yardi Systems, Inc. 09:45AM Telephone Conference 1:25-cv-03315 Balistreri v. Copart of Connecticut, Inc. 10:00AM Telephone Conference 1:26-cv-02726 Evans v. The Partnerships And Unincorporated Associations I 10:00AM Telephone Conference 1:25-cv-10024 Bling Mirror LLC v. Guangzhou Shengyang Leather Goods Co., Ltd. 10:15AM Telephone Conference 1:26-cv-01653 Zou v. Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Compa 10:15AM Telephone Conference 1:24-cv-07080 Collectanea J. Limited v. The Partnerships And Unincorporated Associations I 10:30AM Telephone Conference 1:26-cv-02393 Arizona Board of Regents v. The Partnerships Identified on Schedule A 10:30AM Telephone Conference Number of days notice: No motions shall be noticed for presentment . Motion Type Day Time n/a n/a n/a Court Reporter Amy Weaver (312) 702-8865 Room 2144G Courtroom Deputy Laritza Arcos (312) 702-8874 Room 2140 Law Clerk Taiwo Dosunmu Sean Karunaratne Yousef Kobeissi summarize Related Links Call sheet
Official source: https://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/judge_display.php?LastName=Wood · retrieved 2026-07-23