Home
-->
Test : www.ilnd.uscourts.gov
-->
Home
Judges
-->
Test : www.ilnd.uscourts.gov
-->
Judges
expand_more
Judicial Absence
-->
Judicial Absence
Motion Schedule
-->
Motion Schedule
Mediation Program for the Western Division
-->
Mediation Program for the Western Division
Rules
-->
Test : www.ilnd.uscourts.gov
-->
Rules
expand_more
Local Rules
-->
Local Rules
Federal Rules
-->
Federal Rules
Internal Operating Procedures
-->
Internal Operating Procedures
Internal Operating Procedures (PDF)
-->
Internal Operating Procedures (PDF)
General Orders
-->
General Orders
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Western Division)
-->
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Western Division)
Pattern Jury Instructions
-->
Pattern Jury Instructions
Local Rule 78.5 Request for Decision/Status Report
-->
Local Rule 78.5 Request for Decision/Status Report
Mediation Program for the Western Division
-->
Mediation Program for the Western Division
Local Rules for ADR
-->
Local Rules for ADR
Clerk's Office
-->
Test : www.ilnd.uscourts.gov
-->
Clerk's Office
expand_more
Operations
-->
Operations
Judicial Support
-->
Judicial Support
Information Systems
-->
Information Systems
Administrative Services
-->
Administrative Services
Human Resources
-->
Human Resources
Attorney
-->
Test : www.ilnd.uscourts.gov
-->
Attorney
CM/ECF
-->
Test : www.ilnd.uscourts.gov
-->
CM/ECF
expand_more
Register for CM/ECF
-->
Register for CM/ECF
CM/ECF User Guide
-->
CM/ECF User Guide
CM/ECF Quick Reference Guide
-->
CM/ECF Quick Reference Guide
CM/ECF Training Videos
-->
CM/ECF Training Videos
CM/ECF Password Reset Request
-->
CM/ECF Password Reset Request
General Order on Electronic Case Filing
-->
General Order on Electronic Case Filing
Written Opinions
-->
Written Opinions
Recently Filed Cases
-->
Recently Filed Cases
Access to CM/ECF for the Northern District of Illinois
-->
Access to CM/ECF for the Northern District of Illinois
Daily Calendars
-->
Test : www.ilnd.uscourts.gov
-->
Daily Calendars
Jurors
-->
Test : www.ilnd.uscourts.gov
-->
Jurors
MDL
-->
Test : www.ilnd.uscourts.gov
-->
MDL
Forms
-->
Test : www.ilnd.uscourts.gov
-->
Forms
Pro Se / Representing Yourself
-->
Test : www.ilnd.uscourts.gov
-->
Pro Se / Representing Yourself
expand_more
Pro Se Forms
-->
Pro Se Forms
Federal Civil Case Forms
-->
Federal Civil Case Forms
Guide to Filing a Case in Federal Court Without an Attorney
-->
Guide to Filing a Case in Federal Court Without an Attorney
Guide to Understanding the Federal Courts
-->
Guide to Understanding the Federal Courts
Settlement Assistance Program
-->
Settlement Assistance Program
Settlement Assistance Program Appearance Form
-->
Settlement Assistance Program Appearance Form
Illinois Legal Aid Online – Pro Se Resources
-->
Illinois Legal Aid Online – Pro Se Resources
Pro Se Filer PDF Submissions
-->
Pro Se Filer PDF Submissions
Receive Notices of Electronic Filings by Email
-->
Receive Notices of Electronic Filings by Email
William J. Hibbler Memorial Pro Se Assistance Program Help Desk
-->
William J. Hibbler Memorial Pro Se Assistance Program Help Desk
Schedule an Appointment with the Hibbler Help Desk
-->
Schedule an Appointment with the Hibbler Help Desk
Media
-->
Test : www.ilnd.uscourts.gov
-->
Media
Naturalization, Civics Education & Community Outreach
-->
Test : www.ilnd.uscourts.gov
-->
Naturalization, Civics Education & Community Outreach
expand_more
Civics Education
-->
Civics Education
Court History Documentary
-->
Court History Documentary
Naturalization Ceremony
-->
Naturalization Ceremony
Court History Museum
-->
Court History Museum
Court Lectures
-->
Court Lectures
About the Court
-->
Test : www.ilnd.uscourts.gov
-->
About the Court
expand_more
History of the Court
-->
History of the Court
Proper forms of identification and items not allowed in Courthouses.
-->
Proper forms of identification and items not allowed in Courthouses.
Divisional County Map
-->
Divisional County Map
Careers
-->
Test : www.ilnd.uscourts.gov
-->
Careers
close
Home
»
Judges
»
Judge Information
District Judges
Magistrate Judges
Emergency Judges
Order Transcript
Judge
Alexakis
Alonso
Appenteng
Aspen
Bass Ehler
Berry III
Blakey
Bucklo
Chang
Coleman
Cummings
Daniel
Dow Jr.
Durkin
Ellis
Fuentes
Gettleman
Gilbert
Gottschall
Guzman
Harjani
Holleb Hotaling
Hunt
Iasparro
Jantz
Jenkins
Johnston
Kendall
Kennelly
Kim
Kness
Kocoras
Lefkow
McLaughlin
McNally
McShain
Pacold
Pallmeyer
Perry
Reinhard
Rowland
Schneider
Seeger
Shah
Tharp Jr.
Valderrama
Valdez
Weisman
Wood
Select Judge
Alexakis
Alonso
Appenteng
Aspen
Bass Ehler
Berry III
Blakey
Bucklo
Chang
Coleman
Cummings
Daniel
Dow Jr.
Durkin
Ellis
Fuentes
Gettleman
Gilbert
Gottschall
Guzman
Harjani
Holleb Hotaling
Hunt
Iasparro
Jantz
Jenkins
Johnston
Kendall
Kennelly
Kim
Kness
Kocoras
Lefkow
McLaughlin
McNally
McShain
Pacold
Pallmeyer
Perry
Reinhard
Rowland
Schneider
Seeger
Shah
Tharp Jr.
Valderrama
Valdez
Weisman
Wood
Judge Mary M. Rowland
meeting_room
Courtroom:
1225
gavel
Chambers:
1262
phone
Telephone:
(312) 435-5358
fax
Fax:
(312) 554-8471
error
Notice
PLEASE NOTE: emailing the courtroom deputy at
[email protected]
is the most efficient way to contact Judge Rowland's
chambers. Any questions about Judge Rowland's
practices or cases should be directed to
[email protected]
.
Motions should
not
be noticed for presentment.
Upon the filing of a contested motion, the Court will enter a minute order either setting a motion hearing,
setting a briefing schedule, or otherwise providing further direction to the parties.
All hearings shall proceed in person unless otherwise ordered. Any request to appear by telephone must be made to
the courtroom deputy at
[email protected]
no later than 24
hours
prior to the hearing.
error
Important Information
Filings:
All electronic filings must be generated from the original word file to a PDF document so that the text is searchable. PDF images created by scanning paper documents may be used only for exhibit or reference materials not available in PDF format.
Courtesy copies
:
Judge Rowland does not accept courtesy copies of court filings.
summarize
Case Procedures
event
Calendar Schedule
date_range
Motion Schedule
groups
Chambers Staff
Judge Mary M. Rowland
-->
Procedures to be followed in cases assigned to
Judge Mary M. Rowland
Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge
chevron_right
print
In civil cases the parties may consent to have the assigned United States Magistrate Judge try the case. In many cases, consent to the Magistrate Judge offers significant efficiencies. The Court strongly encourages parties to consider this option. All counsel should discuss this option with their clients and opposing counsel.
Magistrate Judge Consent Form
Discovery Motions
chevron_right
print
The Court believes that parties can and should work out most discovery disputes without the filing of discovery motions. Discovery motions that are filed must comply fully with Local Rule 37.2, which sets forth certain “meet and confer” and certification requirements. An exchange of correspondence -- as opposed to an in-person or telephonic conference -- ordinarily will not suffice.
All parties must be fully prepared to orally argue any discovery motion on the date that it is presented. The Court will often decide discovery motions after oral argument at the motion call and without briefing. If after argument the Court believes the motion requires briefing, the Court normally will set an expedited briefing schedule. Parties are reminded to immediately notify the Court if they are withdrawing any previously filed discovery motions.
Parties are reminded that one party’s failure or inability to respond to discovery will not excuse any other party’s prompt compliance. In addition, unless provided for under applicable law or by court order, the pendency of a motion, such as a motion to dismiss, does not operate to stay discovery.
E-Discovery:
I
f the parties have reached an impasse regarding the discovery of voluminous records from a database, server, computer, service provider or similar electronic storage facility (ESF), before filing a motion to compel, the parties are required to meet and confer with an IT representative of the ESF to be searched in order to determine the most effective way to retrieve the requested material. The party seeking the discovery should also bring its IT specialist to this meeting in order to discuss the proper format for the retrieval of the records. This electronic discovery conference must take place in person and both sides should be prepared to discuss specifically the parameters of both the search and the ESF.
Emergency Motions
chevron_right
print
Emergency matters will be heard only in exceptional circumstances and must be of such a nature that a delay in hearing them would cause serious harm to one or more of the parties. Requests to set a hearing on an emergency motion shall be made with as much advance notice as possible to Judge Rowland’s Courtroom Deputy. The email should provide the case number in the subject line and contain a detailed message. Parties must “CC” counsel for all parties on the email. All reasonable efforts must be made by the party to give actual notice to opposing counsel.
Experience for Newer Attorneys
chevron_right
print
Judge Rowland encourages attorneys and their clients to provide substantive speaking opportunities to less experienced attorneys during any of the Court’s proceedings, including motion and status hearings, settlement conferences, claim construction hearings, pretrial conferences, evidentiary hearings, sentencings, and trials. To that end, Judge Rowland allows more than one attorney per side to speak during any proceeding. So lead attorneys may not only confer with the newer attorney to suggest additional argument or examination questions, they also may jump-in as reasonably necessary to deliver additional argument or even to conduct additional witness examination.
Information For People Without Lawyers (Pro Se)
chevron_right
print
Click here
for Information For People Without Lawyers
(Pro Se).
Although Court employees cannot give you legal
advice, a free self-help assistance program is available to pro se litigants.
Information about this program is available on the website provided above. If
you need further assistance, you may call 312-435-5691.
Initial Status Conference
chevron_right
print
The Court will schedule an initial status hearing for newly-filed cases. In most cases, the initial status hearing will be conducted approximately 60 days after the filing of the complaint. Prior to that status hearing, the parties shall review and comply with this Court's standing orders, including the timely filing of an initial joint report.
At least five business days before the initial status, the parties must file a joint Initial Status Report, not to exceed five pages in length. If defense counsel has not yet filed an appearance, the status report should be prepared by plaintiff’s counsel. The report shall contain the information requested in the Initial Status Report found below.
Initial Status Report
No Post-Trial Contact with Jurors in a Civil or Criminal Case
chevron_right
print
After the conclusion of a trial, no party, agent, or attorney shall communicate with any members of the petit jury before which the case was tried without first receiving permission of the Court.
Patent Cases
chevron_right
print
Judge Rowland follows the Local Patent Rules for the Northern District of Illinois in all patent cases, unless ordered otherwise.
Local Patent Rules
LPR Appendix A
LPR Appendix B
Estimated Patent Case Schedule
Pretrial Order – Civil
chevron_right
print
For civil cases, the parties shall follow the format and guidelines linked below:
Final Pretrial Order – Civil
Pretrial Order – Criminal
chevron_right
print
For criminal cases, the parties shall follow the format and guidelines linked below:
Final Pretrial Order – Criminal
Proposed Confidentiality Orders
chevron_right
print
All counsel requesting entry of an order to preserve the confidentiality of materials disclosed in discovery must base the proposed order on the
Model Confidentiality Order
contained in the Local Rules (Form LR 26.2).
Parties who request entry of an agreed confidentiality order should do so via Judge Rowland's proposed order inbox. If the parties do not agree on the proposed order and have complied with LR 37.2, a motion should be filed and noticed for presentment, and the proposed order should be attached as an exhibit.
Any changes to the model order that the parties propose
must be shown by redlining
that indicates both the deletions and additions to the model text.
For the redlined version, counsel should also include brief comments with any proposed changes explaining why the changes are sought. Counsel shall email copies of the redlined version and the
clean Word version
of the proposed order to the Court’s proposed order inbox (
[email protected]
), with CC to counsel for all parties. The
subject line of the e-mail must include the case number and name and the title of the proposed confidentiality/protective order.
The Court will determine the appropriateness of any proposed order on a case by case basis. In addition, parties are reminded to review Local Rules 5.7, 5.8, and 26.2 regarding filing of documents under seal.
Use of Medical Records in Litigation
The Court reminds counsel that the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) and its regulations create a procedure for obtaining authority to use medical records in litigation, including requesting a qualified protective order. See 45 C.F. R. § 164.512(e). A “qualified protective order” means an order that: (1) prohibits the parties from using or disclosing the protected health information for any purpose other than the litigation for which such information was requested; and (2) requires the return to the covered entity or destruction of the protected health information (including all copies made) at the end of the litigation. 45 C.F.R. § 164.512(e)(1)(v).
Sample HIPAA Order
Proposed Orders
chevron_right
print
Proposed Orders are technically not to be "filed." Rather, they are to be "submitted" to the judge to consider, to modify, if appropriate, and to enter electronically. For example, proposed orders such as stipulated protective orders require court approval before actually being given full effect. To prevent confusion, such proposed orders must be attached to an e-mail sent to the e-mail address of the assigned judge,
[email protected]. The subject line of the e-mail must include the case number and name, the docket number of the corresponding motion, if any, and the title of the order that is proposed. All such documents must be submitted to the court in a format compatible with Word, which is a "Save As" option in most word processing software. Such proposed orders should also be served on all parties.
Settlement Conferences
chevron_right
print
The following are procedures for settlement conferences set before Judge Rowland:
Settlement Conference Procedures
Settlement Dismissal Orders
chevron_right
print
Prior to submitting a proposed order of dismissal pursuant to settlement, counsel should review the following Seventh Circuit cases which discuss the retention of federal jurisdiction to enforce the terms of a settlement agreement:
Blue Cross and Blue Shield Ass’n v. American Express Co.
, 467 F.3d 634 (7th Cir. 2006) and
Shapo v. Engle
, 463 F.3d 641 (7th Cir. 2006). The parties also may wish to review the article, “What’s an Attorney to Do? Ensuring Federal Jurisdiction Over Settlement Agreements in Light of Recent Seventh Circuit Cases,” by Judge Denlow that may be accessed
here
.
Summary Judgment
chevron_right
print
Motions for summary judgment and responses must comply with Local Rule 56.1, as well as the procedures outlined here.
The statements of undisputed material facts and responses shall be filed separately from the memoranda of law and shall include the line, paragraph, or page number where the supporting material may be found in the record. Parties must make the supporting evidence easy to find.
Courtesy copies of exhibits to summary judgment motions and responses should be tabbed for easy access.
The Local Rules are not mere technicalities. The Court expects strict compliance with the Local Rules regarding summary judgment. Failure to comply with the Local Rules may result in the Court striking briefs, disregarding statements of fact, deeming statements of fact admitted, and denying summary judgment.
See
Modrowski v. Pigatto
, 712 F.3d 1166, 1169 (7th Cir. 2013);
Keeton v. Morningstar
, Inc., 667 F.3d 877, 884 (7th Cir. 2012).
The movant shall not file more than 80 statements of undisputed material facts without prior leave of Court. The respondent shall be limited to 40 statements of undisputed material facts absent prior leave of Court. In complex cases, the Court may request that the parties submit a timeline of events in addition to statements of undisputed material facts.
Motions to strike are disfavored. If a party contends that another party has included inadmissible evidence, improper argument, or other objectionable material in a Local Rule 56.1 submission, the party typically should raise its argument that the Court should not consider such material in the party’s response or reply brief – not in a separate motion to strike.
Select a date below to view all schedules.
Monday, July 27, 2026
1 case
expand_more
Case No.
Name
Time
Type
1:24-cr-00220
USA v. Patel
09:00AM
Jury Trial
Tuesday, July 28, 2026
1 case
expand_more
Case No.
Name
Time
Type
1:24-cr-00220
USA v. Patel
09:00AM
Jury Trial
Wednesday, July 29, 2026
1 case
expand_more
Case No.
Name
Time
Type
1:24-cr-00220
USA v. Patel
09:00AM
Jury Trial
Thursday, July 30, 2026
3 cases
expand_more
Case No.
Name
Time
Type
1:19-cr-00754
USA v. Jacquin
09:00AM
Status Hearing
1:24-cr-00220
USA v. Patel
09:00AM
Jury Trial
1:25-cr-00598
USA v. Torres
12:00PM
Change of Plea Hearing
Number of days notice:
Per the Fifth Amended General Order 21-0027, motions should not be noticed for presentment. The Judge will notify parties of the need, if any, for a hearing.
Motion Type
Day
Time
Civ.
n/a
n/a
Court Reporter
Laura Renke
(312) 435-6053
Room 1224
Courtroom Deputy
Jasmin Galindo
(312) 435-5857
Room 1226
Law Clerk
Michael Morrell
Carrie Darden
Joshua Lustig
