Home
-->
Test : www.ilnd.uscourts.gov
-->
Home
Judges
-->
Test : www.ilnd.uscourts.gov
-->
Judges
expand_more
Judicial Absence
-->
Judicial Absence
Motion Schedule
-->
Motion Schedule
Mediation Program for the Western Division
-->
Mediation Program for the Western Division
Rules
-->
Test : www.ilnd.uscourts.gov
-->
Rules
expand_more
Local Rules
-->
Local Rules
Federal Rules
-->
Federal Rules
Internal Operating Procedures
-->
Internal Operating Procedures
Internal Operating Procedures (PDF)
-->
Internal Operating Procedures (PDF)
General Orders
-->
General Orders
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Western Division)
-->
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Western Division)
Pattern Jury Instructions
-->
Pattern Jury Instructions
Local Rule 78.5 Request for Decision/Status Report
-->
Local Rule 78.5 Request for Decision/Status Report
Mediation Program for the Western Division
-->
Mediation Program for the Western Division
Local Rules for ADR
-->
Local Rules for ADR
Clerk's Office
-->
Test : www.ilnd.uscourts.gov
-->
Clerk's Office
expand_more
Operations
-->
Operations
Judicial Support
-->
Judicial Support
Information Systems
-->
Information Systems
Administrative Services
-->
Administrative Services
Human Resources
-->
Human Resources
Attorney
-->
Test : www.ilnd.uscourts.gov
-->
Attorney
CM/ECF
-->
Test : www.ilnd.uscourts.gov
-->
CM/ECF
expand_more
Register for CM/ECF
-->
Register for CM/ECF
CM/ECF User Guide
-->
CM/ECF User Guide
CM/ECF Quick Reference Guide
-->
CM/ECF Quick Reference Guide
CM/ECF Training Videos
-->
CM/ECF Training Videos
CM/ECF Password Reset Request
-->
CM/ECF Password Reset Request
General Order on Electronic Case Filing
-->
General Order on Electronic Case Filing
Written Opinions
-->
Written Opinions
Recently Filed Cases
-->
Recently Filed Cases
Access to CM/ECF for the Northern District of Illinois
-->
Access to CM/ECF for the Northern District of Illinois
Daily Calendars
-->
Test : www.ilnd.uscourts.gov
-->
Daily Calendars
Jurors
-->
Test : www.ilnd.uscourts.gov
-->
Jurors
MDL
-->
Test : www.ilnd.uscourts.gov
-->
MDL
Forms
-->
Test : www.ilnd.uscourts.gov
-->
Forms
Pro Se / Representing Yourself
-->
Test : www.ilnd.uscourts.gov
-->
Pro Se / Representing Yourself
expand_more
Pro Se Forms
-->
Pro Se Forms
Federal Civil Case Forms
-->
Federal Civil Case Forms
Guide to Filing a Case in Federal Court Without an Attorney
-->
Guide to Filing a Case in Federal Court Without an Attorney
Guide to Understanding the Federal Courts
-->
Guide to Understanding the Federal Courts
Settlement Assistance Program
-->
Settlement Assistance Program
Settlement Assistance Program Appearance Form
-->
Settlement Assistance Program Appearance Form
Illinois Legal Aid Online – Pro Se Resources
-->
Illinois Legal Aid Online – Pro Se Resources
Pro Se Filer PDF Submissions
-->
Pro Se Filer PDF Submissions
Receive Notices of Electronic Filings by Email
-->
Receive Notices of Electronic Filings by Email
William J. Hibbler Memorial Pro Se Assistance Program Help Desk
-->
William J. Hibbler Memorial Pro Se Assistance Program Help Desk
Schedule an Appointment with the Hibbler Help Desk
-->
Schedule an Appointment with the Hibbler Help Desk
Media
-->
Test : www.ilnd.uscourts.gov
-->
Media
Naturalization, Civics Education & Community Outreach
-->
Test : www.ilnd.uscourts.gov
-->
Naturalization, Civics Education & Community Outreach
expand_more
Civics Education
-->
Civics Education
Court History Documentary
-->
Court History Documentary
Naturalization Ceremony
-->
Naturalization Ceremony
Court History Museum
-->
Court History Museum
Court Lectures
-->
Court Lectures
About the Court
-->
Test : www.ilnd.uscourts.gov
-->
About the Court
expand_more
History of the Court
-->
History of the Court
Proper forms of identification and items not allowed in Courthouses.
-->
Proper forms of identification and items not allowed in Courthouses.
Divisional County Map
-->
Divisional County Map
Careers
-->
Test : www.ilnd.uscourts.gov
-->
Careers
close
Home
»
Judges
»
Judge Information
District Judges
Magistrate Judges
Emergency Judges
Order Transcript
Judge
Alexakis
Alonso
Appenteng
Aspen
Bass Ehler
Berry III
Blakey
Bucklo
Chang
Coleman
Cummings
Daniel
Dow Jr.
Durkin
Ellis
Fuentes
Gettleman
Gilbert
Gottschall
Guzman
Harjani
Holleb Hotaling
Hunt
Iasparro
Jantz
Jenkins
Johnston
Kendall
Kennelly
Kim
Kness
Kocoras
Lefkow
McLaughlin
McNally
McShain
Pacold
Pallmeyer
Perry
Reinhard
Rowland
Schneider
Seeger
Shah
Tharp Jr.
Valderrama
Valdez
Weisman
Wood
Select Judge
Alexakis
Alonso
Appenteng
Aspen
Bass Ehler
Berry III
Blakey
Bucklo
Chang
Coleman
Cummings
Daniel
Dow Jr.
Durkin
Ellis
Fuentes
Gettleman
Gilbert
Gottschall
Guzman
Harjani
Holleb Hotaling
Hunt
Iasparro
Jantz
Jenkins
Johnston
Kendall
Kennelly
Kim
Kness
Kocoras
Lefkow
McLaughlin
McNally
McShain
Pacold
Pallmeyer
Perry
Reinhard
Rowland
Schneider
Seeger
Shah
Tharp Jr.
Valderrama
Valdez
Weisman
Wood
Magistrate Judge Laura K. McNally
meeting_room
Courtroom:
2230
gavel
Chambers:
2240
phone
Telephone:
(312) 435-5858
fax
Fax:
(312) 554-8071
error
No Notice of Presentment Required
Parties are not to
notice motions for presentment. The Court will notify parties of the
need, if any, for a hearing by electronic means.
error
Communications with Chambers
If the parties need to communicate with chambers on any non-urgent matter, counsel should email Judge McNally's chambers (at
[email protected]
). In particular, the parties should inform the court
as soon as possible if they resolve an issue that is scheduled
for argument or under consideration by the judge. Counsel should copy
all counsel of record on any such emails.
error
WebEx Link for Video Status Hearings
For video hearings, parties are to appear by accessing the following link:
https://us-courts.webex.com/meet/scott_white
Members of the public may listen via teleconference: 1-650-479-3207; Access code: 23166424339. Those not speaking during the hearing must mute themselves. Audio recording of the hearing is not permitted; violations of this prohibition may result in sanctions.
summarize
Case Procedures
event
Calendar Schedule
date_range
Motion Schedule
groups
Chambers Staff
Judge Laura K. McNally
-->
Procedures to be followed in cases assigned to
Judge Laura K. McNally
CONSENT TO PROCEED BEFORE A MAGISTRATE JUDGE
chevron_right
print
Judge McNally encourages parties to consent to her jurisdiction so that she may preside over the entirety of the case, including ruling on dispositive motions and presiding over any trial. Because Judge McNally does not handle felony criminal cases, she generally is able to accommodate the requests of counsel for particular (and firm) trial dates. Parties are encouraged to read 28 U.S.C. § 636 and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73 regarding trial by consent and discuss this option with their clients and opposing counsel.
Magistrate Judge Consent Form
INITIAL STATUS CONFERENCES AND REPORTS
chevron_right
print
In all non-Social Security cases assigned by consent or referral to Judge McNally, the court will issue a minute order instructing the parties on next steps, which may include submitting a joint initial status report and/or appearing for an initial status conference. In addition, parties in cases referred specifically for settlement conference will be ordered to follow the procedures set forth in Judge McNally's
Standing Order for Settlement Conferences.
Standing Order for Joint Initial Status Reports
Standing Order for Initial Status Conference
MOTION PRACTICE
chevron_right
print
Meet and Confer Obligations for All Motions
The meet and confer requirement can have the same effect on other disputes that it has in connection with discovery disputes. A candid discussion between the parties prior to filing motions to dismiss, motions for summary judgment, and motions
in limine
, among others, can limit the scope of such motions or eliminate the need for them to be filed at all. (Summary judgment motions are separately addressed on the Court’s webpage.)
Accordingly, the Court therefore incorporates the requirements of Local Rule 37.2 to all motions that are not joint motions, agreed motions, or unopposed motions. Each motion must state with specificity when and how the movant complied with Local Rule 37.2 by separate certificate filed with the motion and attested to by the attorney.
Parties are reminded that compliance with Local Rule 37.2 requires a good faith effort to resolve disputes through communications and negotiations that take place in person or over the telephone. The Court believes face to face communications are the most effective way to resolve disputes and requires counsel for parties to meet in person or video conference unless it is impracticable to do so. The Rule 37.2 Certificate must state with particularity that this requirement has been met or why it cannot be met. The mere exchange of correspondence will not be sufficient to comply with Local Rule 37.2. Parties who fail to indicate that they have met in person to attempt to resolve their dispute risk having their motion stricken.
Parties are forewarned that if the parties’ inability to be reasonable and compromise results in the filing of excessive motions, the Court may impose additional meet-and-confer requirements on the parties, such as the presence of a court reporter at all meet-and-confer sessions, with the parties to equally share the cost of the court reporter.
Joint/Agreed/Unopposed Motions
Joint, unopposed, and agreed motions should be so identified in both the title and the body of the motion. If there is an objection, the movant must note that fact in the body of the motion.
Motions for Extension of Time
A motion for extension of time shall prominently identify the current deadline. In addition, the motion must indicate (i) the reason for the extension request, and (ii) the number of previous extensions.
Exhibits
For any motion with three or more exhibits, the first attachment exhibit before the substantive exhibits should be a table of contents of all exhibits.
Courtesy Copies
Courtesy copies are required if the electronic filing (including exhibits) exceeds 40 pages. The courtesy copy should always be printed from ECF after electronic filing so that the copies include the ECF header.
Parties citing a deposition transcript in a brief should submit only the cited excerpts in hard copy in the condensed format; the Court does not want hard copies of entire deposition transcripts. The Court prefers all documents to be printed on 3-hole punched paper and binder-clipped if more than 5 pages.
If Motions Become Moot
Counsel should call Judge McNally’s chambers as soon as possible if the parties resolve an issue that is scheduled for argument or is under consideration by the judge. After normal business hours counsel may leave a message on the chambers' voicemail system (312-435-5858).
Format for Motions and Briefing
Discovery-related Motions
Disputes Arising During Depositions
INFORMATION FOR LITIGANTS WITHOUT ATTORNEYS
chevron_right
print
If you are a
pro se
litigant (meaning you do not have a lawyer) in this district, the District Court
Free Self-Help Assistance Program
may be able to provide you with assistance regarding your case. The program operates by appointment and in-person only. Please
click here
to sign up for an appointment. If you have any issues signing up for an appointment, please contact the help desk at (312) 435-5691. Use of the help desk attorney is not a substitute for an attorney. You should seriously consider trying to obtain professional legal assistance. Below are lists of organizations that may be able to offer you free or low-cost legal assistance or a referral to an attorney if you can afford to pay for legal services.
Free or low-cost legal services
Referral Services
Additional resources and information are available in the following links:
Filing a Civil Case Without an Attorney: A Guide for the Pro Se Litigant
Title VII and Section 1981: A Guide for Appointed Attorneys in the Northern District of Illinois
The Americans with Disabilities Act and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act: A Guide for Appointed Attorneys in the Northern District of Illinois
Local Rule 56.2 - Notice to Pro Se Litigants Opposing Summary Judgment
SUBMITTING A PROPOSED ORDER
chevron_right
print
In many instances, after the filing of a motion or after some other development in the litigation,
the Court may request that the Parties submit a proposed order. When the proposed order is ready to be
entered by the Court, the Parties should not file them with the Clerk's Office or with the CM/ECF system.
Instead, the proposed orders should be "submitted" by e-mail sent to
[email protected]
.
The subject line of the e-mail must include the case number and name,
the docket number of the corresponding motion, if any, and the title of the order that is proposed.
The proposed order must be in a format compatible with Word, and all parties must be copied on
the submission.
Submitting a proposed order electronically is not a substitute for filing a motion. A proposed order may only be submitted upon request or leave from the Court. The proposed order email address may not be used for any other purpose or communication with the Court.
ESI DISCOVERY
chevron_right
print
To assist counsel in discovery, the Court has prepared a
sample ESI order
that can govern non-complex ESI discovery. For complex ESI discovery, including discovery that uses technology assisted review, the Court will consider entering a more detailed proposed order submitted by the parties, with an accompanying motion.
Sample ESI Order
CONFIDENTIALITY ORDERS
chevron_right
print
A.
Confidentiality Agreement Among the Parties (No Court Order Necessary
): The parties may agree among themselves to limit disclosure of unfiled discovery information to certain specified persons during the litigation and not to voluntarily disseminate such information to other persons. Court approval of such an agreement or a court order is not necessary. Such an agreement may well address most of the parties’ confidentiality concerns.
B.
Confidentiality/Protective Orders
: If the parties require that a confidentiality order be entered by the Court, they must file a motion seeking such approval. The proposed agreed order should not be filed with the motion. Instead, the proposed order should be submitted to the Court’s Proposed Order email address:
[email protected]
. The parties are directed to use the model confidentiality order approved by the full Court and set forth in the Local Rules:
Form LR 26.2 Model Confidentiality Order
. If the parties wish to deviate from the model order, they must accompany their proposed order along with a red-line document that shows deviations from the model order. Any protective order submitted to the Court for approval must, at a minimum, contain the following:
a carefully-drafted definition of materials to be protected, that is consistent with the Seventh Circuit's description of what is protectable (
e.g.
, "trade secrets," "medical information," "personal identity information");
a statement that the designation of material as confidential reflects a good faith determination by counsel (not by the client) that the material falls within the definition of confidential materials under the protective order;
an explicit statement of the right of a party or interested member of the public to challenge the confidential designation of particular documents that have been filed under seal, with the party asserting confidentiality having the burden of demonstrating the propriety of that designation;
a listing of the persons who may have access to materials designated as confidential;
a procedure for the use of confidential documents at depositions;
a statement that the protective order does not, by itself, authorize the filing of any document under seal and that leave of Court must be obtained before any materials are filed under seal;
a statement providing that the order shall not be construed to govern or affect the admissibility or use of any confidential material at trial or hearing in open court, with any requests for confidentiality or sealing of any hearing or trial to be made to the judge presiding over that proceeding.
Because of the serious potential impact on counsel’s ability to satisfy his or her ethical duties as set forth in the Rules of Professional Conduct, protective orders that include Attorney’s Eyes Only or Outside Counsel’s Eyes Only will come under particularly close scrutiny. A motion seeking approval of a protective order containing such terms must set forth the good faith basis for including these restrictions. In addition, the motion must be accompanied by a certification signed by all parties that they understand and consent to the proposed restriction on the scope of their counsel’s ability to discuss with them certain materials produced in the case.
The Court will review all proposed orders carefully before signing them.
The Court’s issuance of a confidentiality order will constitute the determination, as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c), that then-existing good cause exists for the issuance of the order. This good cause determination may be subject to reconsideration if a party or interested member of the public moves for relief from the limitations of the confidentiality order.
C.
Filing Material Under Seal
: Under
Local Rule 26.2
, no documents may be filed under seal without a prior order of the Court specifying the particular document to be filed. As an alternative to filing under seal, LR 26.2 allows individual judges, at their discretion, to order parties to retain copies of confidential documents in lieu of filing them with the Clerk of Court, to file a redacted copy with the Clerk of Court, and to provide the judge with a complete copy for
in camera
use. In referral cases, Judge McNally will enforce the practice of the referring district judge. In consent cases, Judge McNally will consider using the alternative option permitted by LR 26.2 in appropriate cases.
Leave to File Under Seal will only be granted if the moving party demonstrates good cause. The motion must include a specific description of each document or categories of documents that the party seeks to file under seal and an explanation of why confidentiality is necessary, including citations to supporting authority. The motion must also discuss the relevance of the information to the litigation.
The Court generally will not approve the filing of entire pleadings or briefs under seal. Instead, with rare exception, parties granted leave to seal will be expected to file public versions that simply redact the confidential information, along with a sealed version that does not include redactions.
D.
Use of Medical Records in Litigation
: The Court reminds counsel that the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) and its regulations create a procedure for obtaining authority to use medical records in litigation, including requesting a qualified protective order. 45 C.F. R. § 164.512(e). A “qualified protective order” means an order that: (1) prohibits the parties from using or disclosing the protected health information for any purpose other than the litigation for which such information was requested and (2) requires the return to the covered entity or destruction of the protected health information (including all copies made) at the end of the litigation. 45 C.F.R. § 164.512(e)(1)(v).
Sample HIPAA Qualified Protective Order
SETTLEMENT CONFERENCES
chevron_right
print
Judge McNally believes the parties should fully explore and consider settlement at the earliest opportunity. Early consideration of settlement can prevent unnecessary litigation, allowing the parties to avoid the substantial cost, distraction, and stress inherent in the litigation process. Even for those cases that cannot be resolved through settlement, early consideration of settlement can allow the parties to better understand the factual and legal nature of their dispute and streamline the issues to be litigated.
Consideration of settlement is a serious matter that requires thorough preparation before the settlement conference. Click on the link below for the procedures that Judge McNally will require the parties to follow and the procedures that she will employ in conducting the conference.
Settlement Conference Standing Order
PRIVILEGE LOGS
chevron_right
print
Absent agreement among the parties or court order, if a party withholds otherwise discoverable information on the ground of privilege, the withholding party must provide a log of the documents withheld on the ground of privilege.
See
Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(5) and Advisory Committee Comments to 1993 Amendments. This obligation pertains to materials withheld on the basis of any privilege, not only the attorney-client privilege. Any privilege log must be detailed enough to enable other parties to assess the applicability of the privilege asserted and should include: (1) the name and capacity of each individual from whom or to whom a document and any attachments were sent (including, if relevant to the claimed privilege, which persons are lawyers/doctors/clergy members/spouses); (2) the date of the document and any attachments; (3) the type of document; (4) the Bates numbers of the documents, (5) the nature of the privilege asserted; and (6) a description of the subject matter of the information contained in the document in sufficient detail to determine the applicability of the privilege.
The Court encourages counsel to discuss privilege log issues at the outset of the discovery process and to consider sensible guidelines for the types of materials that may be omitted from the privilege log process by agreement.
The Court reminds the parties that the meet and confer requirements of Local Rule 37.2 apply to privilege disputes, just as they do to other discovery disputes.
SOCIAL SECURITY CASES
chevron_right
print
The Court will generally enter an order setting dates for a briefing schedule, typically providing that: (a) Plaintiff's brief in support of reversing or remanding the decision subject to review shall be filed within 30 days of the filing of the administrative record (no motion required); (b) The Social Security Administration’s motion to affirm the decision subject to review and its brief in support shall be filed within 30 days after plaintiff’s brief is filed. (c) Plaintiff’s reply brief, if any, shall be filed 14 days after defendant’s brief is filed. Judge McNally will only grant extensions on the briefing schedule for good cause shown.
The word count limit on briefs in Social Security Cases is 5000 words (excluding caption, title, tables of contents/authority, and signature blocks). Each brief shall include a word-count certification Typewritten and handwritten briefs may not exceed 20 pages.
The page limit applies only if the petition is handwritten or typewritten. If the petition is produced using a computer, the word limit applies.
The Court encourages counsel to follow the Seventh Circuit’s advice regarding typography, which is included in its Practitioner’s Handbook, starting at page 170. The relevant excerpt can be found here:
https://www.ca7.uscourts.gov/forms/type.pdf
Briefs exceeding the word/page limit are discouraged and may be filed only with leave of Court. With those page restrictions in mind, counsel need not devote multiple pages to the well-recognized standards for the five-part test. A short summary of the standard and citations to authority will likely suffice.
Similarly, all counsel are encouraged to focus the Court’s attention by including only those parts of the medical history that are pertinent to the issues at hand. Be sure to cite to specific record evidence in support of each argument. General statements regarding the sufficiency of the evidence (whether the statement is from the plaintiff or from the Commissioner) will be given no weight absent reference to specific evidence in the record.
The parties are encouraged to draft their briefs with the Seventh Circuit’s opinions in
Warnell v. O’Malley,
97 F.4th 1050 (7th Cir. 2024) and
Morales v. O’Malley,
103 F.4th 469 (7th Cir. 2024) in mind.
MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
chevron_right
print
In-Chambers Conference
Properly prepared motions for summary judgment require considerable Court and attorney time and client expense. Sometimes such motions are unnecessarily filed. A careful examination of the record prior to filing may reveal contested factual issues making the granting of the motion impossible.
For this reason, the Court will require an informal, off-the-record discussion in chambers with the lead attorneys of the parties to discuss whether the filing of a summary judgment motion is advisable given the state of the record. No written submissions should be made prior to the conference. The party who wishes to seek summary judgment should be prepared to point out the uncontested facts that support the relief being sought, and the opposing party should be prepared to speak to whether in fact those facts are contested. After the parties have satisfied their meeting and confer obligations, the moving party should schedule the informal conference with the Courtroom Deputy. No party will ever be prevented from filing a dispositive motion, but the goal of the in-chambers conference is to have a careful, informed discussion of the issues before significant time and expense have been incurred.
In some cases, the Court may determine that an in-chambers conference would not be helpful. Parties, however, should always inquire with the Court prior to filing a summary judgment motion.
Summary Judgment Motion Practice
The Court requires strict compliance with
Local Rules 56.1(a) and 56.1(b)
in the briefing of all summary judgment motions. In addition, to assist the Court in reviewing the factual record submitted in connection with summary judgment motions, the Court requires the following:
A courtesy copy of the memorandum of law, depositions and other materials relied upon in support of the motion (as required by
Local Rule 56.1(a)(1)-(3)
) or in opposition to the motion (as required by
Local Rule 56.1(b)(1)-(3)
) must be delivered to chambers within 24 hours of when it is filed on the CM/ECF system. The courtesy copy of the compendium must be securely bound, must separately tab each document, and must contain an index identifying what document is contained under each tab. It must also have the CM/ECF header.
All statements of undisputed material facts offered by the moving party under
Local Rule 56.1(a)(3)
, or statements of additional facts offered by the opposing party under
Local Rule 56.1(b)(3)(C)
, must list the facts in short, numbered paragraphs that refrain from argument. Argument must be reserved for the moving party’s memorandum of law. Each numbered fact statement must contain a specific citation to affidavits, depositions or other materials that support the fact statement, as well as to the tab(s) in the compendium where those materials may be found. Failure to provide support for a statement of fact may result in that alleged "fact" being disregarded.
Friend v. Valley View Community Unit School Dist. 365U
, 789 F.3d 707, 710-11 (7th Cir. 2015).
All responses to statements of undisputed material facts offered by the opposing party under
Local Rule 56.1(b)(3)(B)
, or responses to statements of additional facts offered by the moving party under
Local Rule 56.1(a)
, shall be in a format similar to that used in answering a complaint: that is, the response must repeat each numbered paragraph of the fact statement, and then immediately following each numbered statement must state whether the alleged fact is "undisputed" or "disputed." As with the fact statements submitted under
Local Rules 56.1(a)(3) and 56.1(b)(3)(C)
, the responses to those fact statements must refrain from argument. The significance or lack of significance of a disputed or undisputed fact may be argued in the respondent’s legal memorandum. If a particular fact is "undisputed," nothing more should be said in the response. If a particular fact assertion is "disputed" in whole or in part, the response must state what part of the assertion is disputed and must contain a specific citation to the supporting affidavits, depositions or other materials as well as to the tab(s) in the compendium where those materials may be found. Failure to provide support for an alleged fact dispute may result in that fact being deemed admitted.
Curtis v. Costco Wholesale Corp.
, 807 F.3d 215, 218-19 (7th Cir. 2015).
In accord with
Local Rule 56.1
, absent prior leave of Court, a movant shall not file more than 80 separately numbered statements of undisputed material fact, and a party opposing a summary judgment motion shall not file more than 40 separately numbered statements of additional facts under
Local Rule 56.1(b)(3)(C)
. The Court reminds parties that the fact statements under
Local Rule 56.1(a)(3)
and
Local Rule 56.1(b)(3)(C)
“shall consist of short numbered paragraphs.”
Motions to strike or deemed admitted Local Rule 56.1 statement of facts will not be accepted by the Court. These concerns should be raised in the parties’ briefs.
PRETRIAL PROCEDURES AND FINAL PRETRIAL ORDER
chevron_right
print
A final pretrial conference will be held approximately one to two weeks before trial. The purpose of this conference will be to avoid surprises and to simplify the trial. At the conference, Judge McNally will address pending motions
in limine
, objections to witnesses and exhibits, and contested jury instructions, and will discuss trial procedures and scheduling. Lead trial counsel with authority to discuss all aspects of the case must attend.
Prior to the final pretrial conference, the parties shall jointly prepare and submit a Proposed Pretrial Order for the Court’s consideration that contains the sections and information described below. The Proposed Pretrial Order must be emailed to
[email protected]
in Word format, with two courtesy copies delivered to chambers and all counsel included as cc: recipients. The subject line of the email must include the case number, case name, and title of the submission. The Proposed Pretrial Order must also be filed on the docket by selecting “Other Filings” and then “Other Documents,” and choosing the Proposed Pretrial Order event in CM/ECF. The Court will set a date for filing the proposed pretrial order.
Motions
in Limine
and
Daubert
Proceedings
The Court will set a separate schedule for the filing of motions
in limine
when it sets dates for the filing of the Pretrial Order. The Court discourages the filing of “boilerplate” motions
in limine
or motions that address matters not in dispute. The parties must confer on all motions
in limine
before filing them. If there is no objection to a motion, but the movant wishes to file a motion memorializing the non-objection, then the motion must state that there is no objection.
Absent prior leave of Court, motions
in limine
(not including exhibits) are limited to a total of 3500 words per party (not per motion), and responses (not including exhibits) are likewise limited to a total of 3500 words per party.
Typewritten and handwritten motions and response briefs may not exceed 15 pages.
The page limit applies only if the petition is handwritten or typewritten. If the petition is produced using a computer, the word limit applies. These limitations do not apply to motions challenging the admissibility of Rule 702 expert testimony pursuant to
Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc
. Such
Daubert
motions should be filed separately and as soon as reasonably possible, preferably well in advance of the final pretrial conference and the deadline for motions
in limine
.
Contents of Final Pretrial Order
Select a date below to view all schedules.
Monday, July 27, 2026
1 case
expand_more
Case No.
Name
Time
Type
1:20-cv-00117
Guster -Hines v. McDonald's USA, LLC
09:30AM
Settlement Conference
Tuesday, July 28, 2026
3 cases
expand_more
Case No.
Name
Time
Type
1:25-cv-07768
Medema v. Nuna Baby Essentials, Inc.
09:00AM
Motion Hearing
1:26-cv-06631
Alacron-Gonzalez v. Walmart Inc.
10:00AM
Status Hearing
1:25-cv-10627
Villa v. El popocatepetl Industries, Inc
01:30PM
Settlement Conference
Wednesday, July 29, 2026
2 cases
expand_more
Case No.
Name
Time
Type
1:23-cv-04953
Rodriguez v. ByteDance, Inc.
11:00AM
Motion Hearing
1:22-cv-00475
Kilborn v. Amiridis
01:30PM
Settlement Conference
Thursday, July 30, 2026
2 cases
expand_more
Case No.
Name
Time
Type
1:24-cv-12715
Lee v. Diaz
10:00AM
Status Hearing
1:26-cr-00366
USA v. Ellis
01:30PM
Preliminary Examination
Number of days notice:
Motion Type
Day
Time
Courtroom Deputy
Scott White
(312) 408-5110
Room 2226
Law Clerk
Melanie Berkowitz
Abrar Omeish
