UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
STANDING ORDER IN CIVIL CASES
Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers
(Updated June 22, 2026)
1. Conformity to Rules. Parties are expected to consult and comply with all provisions of
the Local Rules and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure relating to motions, briefs,
continuances, and all other matters, unless specifically superseded by this Standing Order. Any
failure to comply with any of the rules and the Court’s Standing Order may be deemed sufficient
grounds for monetary sanctions, dismissal, entry of default judgment, or other appropriate
sanctions. Parties are advised that this Standing Order is subject to change without notice and
that they should check for the latest revisions on the Court’s website at
https://cand.uscourts.gov/judges/ygr/gonzalez-rogers-yvonne.
2. Scheduling days. Prior to noticing a motion, parties shall check the scheduling
information on this Court’s website to confirm open and available dates. However, noticed days
may be reset as the Court’s calendar requires, with order of call to be determined by the Court.
Generally, the Court will schedule as follows:
a. Case Management Conferences are conducted on Mondays at 2:00 p.m.
b. Civil Law and Motion calendar is conducted on Tuesdays at 9:00 a.m.
If the Court is in trial, the calendar will be conducted at 2:00 p.m. or at a time
otherwise provided by the Court.
c. Pretrial conferences are conducted on Fridays at 9:30 a.m. Trials are set to
commence on Mondays at 8:00 a.m.
d. Before appearing for a matter before this Court, all parties shall check the Court’s
calendar at cand.uscourts.gov to confirm that their matter is still on calendar.
Frequently, the Court will issue a written order and vacate the hearing unless oral
argument appears to be necessary. Where argument is allowed, the Court will
attempt to advise counsel in advance of the issues to be addressed.
The default rule is that all Case Management Conferences are held via Zoom
videoconference and all other proceedings are presumed to be in-person. Parties
are advised that the Court may exercise its discretion to deviate from these default
rules. Requests to appear by videoconference may be entertained upon a
compelling showing of good cause. Any changes to the default settings will be
communicated via the case docket, public calendar, and/or email correspondence.
It is the parties’ burden to keep appraised of changes to the Court calendar.
In addition, if a written request for oral argument is filed before issuance of a
ruling stating that a lawyer six or fewer years out of law school will conduct all or
most of the oral argument, the Court will entertain oral argument on the principle
that young lawyers need more opportunities for appearances than they typically
receive.
e. If a party intends to use audio-visual demonstratives during a hearing (e.g.,
PowerPoint presentation), it shall provide a copy to opposing parties and the
Court no fewer than 24 hours in advance of the hearing and bring printed copies
of the demonstrative(s) to the hearing. If a party requires use of audio-visual
equipment in the courtroom, the party shall contact the Courtroom Deputy, Edwin
Cuenco, to make an appointment to test that equipment on a date at least one day
in advance of the hearing.
3. Changes to Court Calendar. No changes to the Court’s schedule shall be made except
by signed order of the Court and only upon a showing of good cause. Parties seeking to continue
hearings, request special status conferences, modify briefing schedules, or make any other
procedural changes shall submit a signed stipulation and proposed order, or, if a stipulation is not
possible, a Motion for Administrative Relief as contemplated by Civil Local Rule 7-11.
Continuances will be granted only upon a showing of good cause, particularly focusing on
evidence of diligence by the party seeking delay and of prejudice that may result if the
continuance is denied. Briefing schedules may not be changed without Court approval. The
Court generally will not approve elongated briefing schedules without sufficient explanation.
Parties seeking to enlarge a filing deadline by way of a Motion for Administrative Relief
are admonished to file such a motion in advance of the filing deadline, with sufficient time for
the Court to respond (not on the day the filing is due or immediately prior). Parties are advised
that requests which, in effect, do not allow the Court two weeks from the filing of the last brief
until the scheduled hearing date are likely to be denied.
Requests to accommodate remote appearances for compliance deadlines will be
summarily denied. All compliance deadlines are decided on the papers unless otherwise stated
by the Court.
4. Notice of Hearing Location. Parties shall notice hearings for the Oakland Federal
District Courthouse, 1301 Clay Street, Courtroom 1, Fourth Floor. However, the courtroom
location is subject to change. Hearings may be held by Zoom videoconference at the Court’s
discretion. Parties should check the Court’s website, the case docket, and/or notifications posted
at the Courthouse leading up to and on the hearing date.
5. Chambers Copies. This requirement does not apply to self-represented litigants.
Chambers copy of all motions in excess of 15 pages, inclusive of exhibits and attachments,
whether electronically filed or manually filed at the Clerk’s Office, shall be submitted to the
Clerk’s Office in an envelope clearly marked with the case number and “YGR Chambers Copy”
for receipt by no later than 12:00 noon the second business day after the document is filed.
Submission by overnight delivery such as Federal Express or UPS is sufficient.
a. All chambers’ copies must be 3-hole punched in the left margin in a manner
suitable for placement in a 3-ring binder. They shall not be stapled.
b. Chambers copies must include tabs between exhibits and must fasten or attach
pages of individual documents together so as to distinguish between separate
documents. Do not use bottom tabs as they do not work well in binders.
2
c. Chambers copies in summary judgment motions: Chambers copies of all
summary judgment motions and oppositions (including the brief, separate
statement, declarations, exhibits, and other supporting documents) are required to
be provided by the filing party in a 3-ring binder or binders with tabs separating
documents. Submitting chambers copies of the reply documents in a binder is
optional. This requirement does not apply to habeas corpus petitions or summary
judgment motions in ERISA or Social Security cases.
d. Chambers copies in administrative motions to seal: As noted in paragraph 11
below, parties shall provide chambers copies of the unredacted documents with
proposed redacted material highlighted only. Parties shall not submit chambers
copies of the redacted versions of documents they seek to seal.
e. Chambers copies submitted without meeting the above requirements may be
rejected, and the party may be required to re-submit.
f. In motions involving voluminous citations to evidence or records, parties are
encouraged to submit chambers copies of their briefing in an electronic
format with hyperlinks to the evidence, on flash drives or other removable
media. Parties may request to submit such electronic copies in lieu of paper
chambers copies.
6. Case Management Conference. Joint case management statements are required and
must be filed seven days in advance of the initial case management conference date.
Updated joint case management statements are required and must be filed seven days in advance
of all other case management conferences. In cases involving litigants unrepresented by counsel,
the parties may file separate case management statements.
The format shall follow the Standing Order for All Judges of the Northern District of California
re: Contents of Joint Case Management Statement (“CAND CMC Order”) found on the Court’s
website at cand.uscourts.gov/ygr.
a. These conferences are intended to be substantive and productive. Accordingly,
each party shall be represented at case management conferences by lead trial
counsel or counsel with authority to enter into stipulations and make
admissions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(a) and (c), as well as fully prepared to
address all of the matters in the CAND CMC Order and Civil L.R. 16-10(b).
Failure to do so shall be considered grounds for sanctions. Because of the
substantive discussions that occur during case management conferences,
telephonic appearances are disfavored.
7. Proposed Orders Required. Each party filing or opposing any motion shall also serve a
proposed order that sets forth the relief or action sought and a short statement of the rationale of
the decision, including citation of authority that the party requests the Court to adopt, and
citations to the record evidence where applicable. The proposed order should be submitted at the
same time as the motion or opposition, with a courtesy copy emailed to
[email protected]. This email address should not be used by litigants for substantive
communications.
3
8. Discovery and Discovery Motions. Time permitting, the Court will maintain discovery
disputes. The provisions of this paragraph apply only to cases in which discovery is supervised
by this Court.
Except as specifically set forth below, no motions regarding discovery disputes may be
filed without prior leave of Court.
a. Depositions: If a dispute arises during a deposition and involves a persistent
obstruction of the deposition or a refusal to answer a material question on the
basis of any ground other than privilege or the work-product doctrine, counsel
may arrange a telephonic conference with the Court by contacting the Courtroom
Deputy, Aris Garcia, at (510) 637-3540. Any such conference shall be attended
by the court reporter recording the deposition.
b. Joint Discovery Letter: All other requests for discovery relief must be
summarized by the parties in one joint letter brief no longer than four pages (two
pages per side). In the joint letter brief, counsel must attest that, prior to filing the
request for relief, counsel met and conferred in person or by videoconference, and
then concisely summarize all remaining issues that counsel were unable to
resolve. The parties may not file multiple joint letter briefs irrespective of the
number of disputes then at-issue. If there are multiple disputes at issue, the
parties may provide a list of disputes as part of their joint letter brief.
The joint letter brief may cite to limited and specific legal authority only
for resolution of dispositive issues. The joint letter brief may not be accompanied
by declarations; however any specific excerpt of disputed discovery material may
be attached. The Court will then advise the parties if additional briefing, a
telephonic conference, or a personal appearance will be necessary.
Note: Discovery letter briefs must be e-filed under the Civil Events category of
Motions and Related Filings: Motions—General: “Discovery Letter Brief.”
c. Stipulated Protective Orders:
1. Parties submitting proposed forms of stipulated protective order shall
include the following language with respect to resolution of designation
disputes:
[6.3 Judicial Intervention.] If the Parties cannot resolve a challenge
without court intervention, the parties shall follow the Court’s Standing Order in
Civil Cases regarding Discovery and Discovery Motions. The parties may file a
joint letter brief regarding retaining confidentiality within 21 days of the initial
notice of challenge or within 14 days of the parties agreeing that the meet and
confer process will not resolve their dispute, whichever is earlier. Failure by a
Designating Party to file such discovery dispute letter within the applicable 21-
or 14-day period (set forth above) with the Court shall automatically waive the
confidentiality designation for each challenged designation. If, after submitting
a joint letter brief, the Court allows that a motion may be filed, any such motion
must be accompanied by a competent declaration affirming that the movant has
complied with the meet and confer requirements imposed in the preceding
4
paragraph. The Court, in its discretion, may elect to transfer the discovery
matter to a Magistrate Judge.
In addition, the parties may file a joint letter brief regarding a challenge
to a confidentiality designation at any time if there is good cause for doing so,
including a challenge to the designation of a deposition transcript or any
portions thereof. If, after submitting a joint letter brief, the Court allows that a
motion may be filed, any motion brought pursuant to this provision must be
accompanied by a competent declaration affirming that the movant has complied
with the meet and confer requirements imposed by the preceding paragraph.
The Court, in its discretion, may elect to refer the discovery matter to a
Magistrate Judge.
The burden of persuasion in any such challenge proceeding shall be on
the Designating Party. Frivolous challenges, and those made for an improper
purpose (e.g., to harass or impose unnecessary expenses and burdens on other
parties) may expose the Challenging Party to sanctions. Unless the Designating
Party has waived the confidentiality designation by failing to file a letter brief to
retain confidentiality as described above, all parties shall continue to afford the
material in question the level of protection to which it is entitled under the
Producing Party’s designation until the court rules on the challenge.
2. The Northern District provides a model form of Stipulated Protective
Order for Standard Litigation at https://cand.uscourts.gov/rules-forms-
fees/northern-district-guidelines/model-protective-orders. The parties shall
submit a redline comparison with the model Stipulated Protective Order
for Standard Litigation, along with their electronic form of proposed order,
to
[email protected].
9. Motions for Summary Judgment.
a. Pre-filing Conference Required: Except as specifically set forth below, no
motion for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Rules of Civil
Procedure may be filed without prior leave of Court. The moving party must file
a letter, with a copy to Chambers and the opposing parties, to request a pre-filing
conference, and propose a date and time for such conference. Pre-filing
conferences are normally set for Wednesday or Friday afternoons at 2:00 p.m.
unless circumstances and the Court’s calendar require otherwise, and should be
requested sufficiently in advance of the deadlines established in the Court’s initial
case management order. All pre-filing conferences are held in person and
appearances via telephone and videoconference will not be allowed.
The moving party’s letter shall be submitted at least seven (7) business days prior
to the proposed conference date and must explain the grounds for the motion.
The letter shall be no more than three single-spaced pages in length, including any
attached exhibits or other supporting papers. Within three (3) business days after
receipt of the letter, any party who will oppose the motion must file a written
response addressing the substance of the moving party’s letter, with a copy to
5
Chambers and the moving party. This response shall also be limited to three
single-spaced pages, including any attached exhibits or supporting papers.
This pre-filing requirement does not apply to either side in cases where one party
is self-represented. This pre-filing requirement also does not apply to habeas
corpus petitions or motions in Social Security appeals.
Parties are on notice that the Court may, in its discretion, request copies of
evidence and/or additional case authority to the extent it will provide for a
fulsome discussion at the Pre-Filing Conference.
b. One Motion Per Side: All issues shall be contained within one motion, may not
exceed twenty-five pages in length, and shall conform to Civil Local Rule 7-2.
Only one summary judgment motion may be filed collectively per side,
absent leave of court. Leave of court to file more than one motion may be
requested if multiple parties comprise one or both sides. This issue will be
addressed at the Pre-filing Conference.
c. Separate Statements: Any party moving for summary judgment or opposing
summary judgment is required to submit a separate statement as set forth herein.
Pro se plaintiffs, however, are not required to submit a separate statement.
1. Supporting Separate Statement: Parties moving for summary judgment
must include a separate, short and concise statement of the material facts
as to which the moving party contends there is no genuine issue to be tried
(“Supporting Separate Statement”). The Supporting Separate Statement
must: (1) identify the issue or claim number(s) to which the fact relates;
and (2) list each asserted material fact and the record evidence with
specific pincites (e.g., deposition, declaration, discovery response). Upon
filing, the moving party shall provide the separate statement to all other
parties in an electronic, word-processing format for ease of response
thereto. The Supporting Separate Statement must follow this format:
Opposing
Party’s
Moving Party’s Undisputed Material Facts
Issue No. Response and
and Supporting Evidence
Supporting
Evidence
Issue 1 Fact 1. Doe Co. and Acme Co. entered into a
(Doe cannot written contract for sale of widgets.
establish Roe Declaration at 2:17-21 and Exh. A [contract].
breach of
contract)
Issue 1 Fact 2. Widgets were received by Doe’s
headquarters on December 1, 2010.
Roe Declaration at 3:14-19 and Exh. B [signed
invoice].
6
2. Responsive Separate Statement: The papers opposing a motion for
summary judgment shall include one Responsive Separate Statement
which: (1) incorporates the facts in the moving separate statement; (2)
provides a response to each of the facts in the correspondingly numbered
paragraph in the moving separate statement; and (3) identifies any
additional material facts that the party contends will establish a genuine
issue to be tried. For each fact, the Responsive Separate Statement shall
state whether the party contends the fact is disputed and the evidence
establishing any dispute with particular citations to the record. These
requirements also apply to any response to additional material facts raised
in the opposition.
If the opposing party contends that the fact is in dispute, the party must
cite to evidence in the record which establishes the dispute. Consistent
with the Civil Local Rules, evidentiary objections shall be provided in the
motion papers. Objections raised in the Responsive Separate Statement of
are improper and may be disregarded. Responsive Separate Statements
must follow this format:
Opposing Party’s
Moving Party’s Undisputed Material Response and
Issue No.
Facts and Supporting Evidence Supporting
Evidence
Issue 1 (No Fact 1. Doe Co. and Acme Co. entered into Undisputed.
breach of a written contract for sale of widgets.
contract) Roe Decl. at 2:17-21 and Exh. A
[contract].
Issue 1 Fact 2. Widgets were received by Doe Disputed. No
Co.’s headquarters on December 1, 2010.
widgets were
Roe Decl. at 3:14-19 and Exh. B [invoice].
received. Jackson
Decl., Exh. B [Smith
Depo.] at 21:04-
23:19.
OPPOSING PARTY’S ADDITIONAL MATERIAL FACTS
Issue 1 Additional Fact 3: An empty crate was Jackson Declaration,
delivered to Doe Co.’s headquarters on Exh. B [Smith
December 1, 2010. Depo.] at 32:06-
33:12.
3. Page Limits for Separate Statements: Unless a party has obtained prior
permission from this Court, the Supporting Separate Statement is limited
to no more than fifteen (15) pages, and the Responsive Separate Statement
is limited to no more than five (5) additional pages beyond the number of
pages in the opening statement.
7
4. Attestation Required for Separate Statements: The Supporting and
Responsive Separate Statement each must be signed by lead counsel (or
by the party, if unrepresented by counsel) who has reviewed the document
and can attest as follows: “I attest that the evidence cited herein fairly
and accurately supports [or disputes] the facts as asserted.”
d. Evidence Submitted: Consistent with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56,
parties shall provide particular citations to the record. Moreover, parties shall
underline, highlight, or otherwise specify lines of the documents and transcripts
upon which they rely in support of or opposition to a motion. As noted in
paragraph 5(f), parties are encouraged to submit chambers copies of their briefing
in an electronic format with hyperlinks to the evidence.
1. Deposition Transcripts. The parties shall not file complete deposition
transcripts with the Court. The parties shall instead file only the relevant,
highlighted excerpts from those transcripts.
e. Cross-Motions: Any cross-motion for summary judgment shall be contained
within the opposition to any motion for summary judgment, shall contain twenty-
five (25) pages or less, and shall be filed fourteen (14) days after the filing of the
motion. The reply to a motion may contain up to fifteen (15) pages, shall include
the opposition to any cross-motion, and shall be filed seven (7) days after the
filing of the opposition. (See Civil Local Rule 7-3). The Court may, sua sponte or
pursuant to a motion under Civil L.R. 6-3, reschedule the hearing so as to give a
moving party time to file a reply to any cross-motion.
f. Pro Se Employment Actions: A party bringing a motion for summary judgment
in a pro se employment action must certify compliance with General Order 71
within the motion for summary judgment.
10. Experts and their Reports. All witnesses who will provide expert testimony under
Federal Rule of Evidence 702, 703, or 705, whether retained or non-retained, must be disclosed
and must provide written reports in compliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
26(a)(2)(B). All expert reports shall number each paragraph to facilitate any motion practice
challenging the specifics of any opinions and shall include a table of contents. At the beginning
of the report, the expert shall list and number each opinion to be proffered in the report and, if
applicable, provide an executive opinion of each.
Any percipient witness who may also testify at trial with technical expertise akin to an
independent expert shall be identified by name no later than the date of expert disclosures to
allow for deposition, if necessary.
Unless otherwise ordered affirmatively in a scheduling order, the parties may meet and
confer and jointly agree that any/all such witnesses should be required to produce expert reports
identifying any opinions of an expert nature to be provided in the action.
At the time of disclosure of a written report, the disclosing party must identify all written
materials upon which the expert relies in that report and produce those materials if they have not
done so previously.
8
11. Daubert Motions. Each side is limited to three Daubert motions throughout the entire
case absent leave of court. Daubert motions must clearly specify the paragraphs or portions of
the report that the party seeks to exclude. Parties are reminded that issues going to the weight
and credibility to be given to a report are not proper bases to bring a Daubert motion.
12. Motions to Seal. The motion to seal process detailed below applies to complex cases
where numerous sealing motions are filed or otherwise anticipated.
As a general matter, the parties are advised that the Court is not inclined to seal competitively
sensitive information that is more than three years old, but it is inclined to seal personally
identifiable information (“PII”) or protected health information (“PHI”).
12.1 Procedures for Filing Under Seal: If a party seeks to file a document under seal, the
filing party shall:
a. File the primary motion, brief, or other docket item (the “Primary Entry”) as its
own docket entry, per normal filing procedures.
b. If requesting that the Primary Entry or any attachment be sealed, do not include
any attachments to the Primary Entry. 1 For example, if a party wishes to redact
confidential material included in its brief, the party must file the redacted version
of the brief as the Primary Entry. Do not include exhibits or attachments to that
entry.
To file the sealed brief, exhibits, or attachments, next immediately file a motion to
file under seal using the event “Administrative Motion to File Under Seal” event
(“Temporary Sealing Motion”).
i. The Temporary Sealing Motion shall include as attachments all items
associated with the Primary Entry.
Example of How to File on the Docket
A party wants to file a motion for relief. They want to file: the motion with redactions, Ex. A
with redactions, Ex. B with no sealing/redactions, and Ex. C entirely under seal. They would
file the redacted version of the motion for relief with no attachments, (e.g. at Dkt. No. 100)
and then, at the next docket entry (Dkt. No. 101), file a Temporary Sealing Motion with the
content described in this section. Then, they would attach all items associated with the
Primary Entry:
• Dkt. No. 101-1: Motion for Relief (Sealed)
• Dkt. No. 101-2: Exhibit A (Sealed)
• Dkt. No. 101-3: Exhibit A (Redacted)
1
All attachments means all items, whether sealed, unsealed, containing filing party’s
confidential materials, or other party’s confidential materials. The Court’s goal is to have all
items associated with a motion/brief located in one docket entry.
9
• Dkt. No. 101-4: Exhibit B (Not under seal)
• Dkt. No. 101-5: Ex. C: (Sealed)
Note that if, like Ex. C above, a document is filed entirely under seal, there is no need to file
an additional docket entry with a cover page indicating that it has been filed under seal, as
under the standard procedures.
i. The Temporary Sealing Motion itself shall:
1. State that the reasons for sealing will be addressed in a
forthcoming omnibus motion.
2. Include a chart identifying:
a. Each attachment by docket number and content (e.g., Dkt.
No. 101-3, Exhibit A to Motion for Relief, Sealed).
b. Whether the sealed contents contains the filing party’s
confidential information or another party’s confidential
information.
c. Chambers Copies
i. The filing party shall provide the Court with electronic copies (on a USB
or flash-drive) that contains the sealed material.
d. Service and Opportunity for Dedesignation
i. The filing party shall serve all documents to be sealed upon all parties and
on any designating third party whose confidential information is included.
ii. Within 10 calendar days of service, each designating party or third party
shall communicate with the filing party regarding the sealing designations
made.
1. If the designating party agrees with the proposed provisional
sealing, no action is needed until the omnibus sealing procedures
described in the Post-Briefing Omnibus Sealing Procedures.
2. If the designating party believes a document may be filed with
redactions (rather than entirely under seal) or with fewer
redactions, the designating party shall provide the filing party with
a redacted version of the document for filing. The filing party will
then be responsible for providing the document to the Court in
accordance with the Post-Briefing Omnibus Sealing Procedures.
3. If the designating party determines that the document is not
entitled to protection, the designating party shall provide the filing
party with a version of the document removing the confidentiality
designations for filing.
10
12.2 Post-Briefing Omnibus Sealing Procedures
a. Within 7 calendar days following the conclusion of briefing on the motion or
other filing 2 for which the sealing requests were made, the parties shall meet and
confer regarding the proposed sealing and redactions.
b. Within 14 days following the conclusion of briefing on the motion or other filing
for which the sealing requests were made, the parties shall file:
i. Omnibus Sealing Stipulation: Parties shall file an omnibus sealing
stipulation addressing all documents and portions of documents sought to
be sealed in connection with the underlying motion or other court filing.
The omnibus sealing stipulation shall include:
1. A chart listing all documents requested to be sealed. The chart
shall identify:
a. each document by a consistent identifier (e.g., Bates
number) as well as by the docket entry at which it has been
filed under seal;
the documents shall be organized, or grouped, by
the action requested. For example, undisputed
requests to maintain a document under seal or
undisputed requests to modify redactions shall be
grouped together. If a document is subject to
multiple requested actions (e.g., it contains both
undisputed redactions and disputed redactions), it
should receive entries in each section as
appropriate.
b. if the request is undisputed, the basis for sealing; 3
c. whether a party has previously sought to seal the document
or any information in the document; whether it was sealed;
and the docket location of the order addressing the request.
To the extent that the parties agree to seal PHI or PII, the
parties must provide in the chart a statement identifying the
types of information that the parties consider PHI or PII
(including telephone numbers, addresses, health records) in
a separate entry so that the Court may order that
information sealed.
Example:
2
All Daubert motions shall be treated as one motion for purposes of this section. This
means that though there may be numerous Daubert motions, parties shall file one Omnibus
Sealing Stipulation and one set of Omnibus Sealing Motions, as described in this section.
Similarly, cross-motions shall be treated as one motion.
3
This should be brief. The Court shall request further explanation if necessary.
11
Undisputed/Plaintiff/Defendant/Third-Party Request to Maintain a Document Under Seal or with
Redactions
Portion to be Previously
Dkt. No. Description/ Title Basis for Sealing
Sealed Sealed
Undisputed Requests to Maintain PHI/PII Under Seal
Portion to be Previously
Dkt. No. Description/ Title Basis for Sealing
Sealed Sealed
2. Declarations supporting requests to seal.
3. Proposed Order On Sealing Requests: Parties shall file and email
to the Court’s proposed order inbox, a proposed order addressing
all sealing requests. This shall be in chart form with a column
identifying the document(s), a column describing the action to be
taken (seal, portions to redact, unseal), and a column for the
Court’s order.
Example:
Requested Action/ Portion to
Dkt. No Document Ruling
Seal
4. Documents. If the parties agree that a document was improperly
sealed, or that redactions should be modified, the parties (and not
the Clerk of Court) shall file those documents on the public docket
after filing the omnibus sealing stipulation.
5. Exclusions. To the extent the parties agree that information
constitutes PHI or PII, the parties need not include this information
in the sealing chart or proposed order.
ii. Omnibus Motions on Sealing Disputes:
1. Each party may file one motion addressing all disputed documents
and information. Each motion shall be no longer than 5 pages
12
unless leave from the Court is granted. 4 Motions shall be
accompanied by appropriate declarations.
2. Within 5 business days of the motions being filed, each party may
file one opposition, of no more than 5 pages, unless leave is
granted per the procedures identified above, in response to the
sealing motions.
3. Within 5 business days of the opposition filing, moving parties
shall file replies of no more than five pages, unless leave is granted
per the procedures described above.
b. Extension of Time Relating to Sealing Procedure. The parties may, by
stipulation filed on the docket, extend the time to file the Omnibus Stipulation and
Omnibus Motion to 21 days after the conclusion of briefing. Extensions beyond
21 days must be approved by the Court.
c. Chambers Copies. The parties shall provide the Court with electronic copies (on
a USB or flash-drive) that contain all sealed material.
12.3 Procedures After Court Issues Sealing Orders
After the Court issues its order(s) on the parties’ omnibus stipulation and motion(s) to seal, the
parties shall proceed as follows:
a. If the Court determines that sealed material should remain under seal, no further
action is needed. The document or portions of documents will remain under seal
or redacted where filed.
b. If the Court orders a document, or portions of that document, be unsealed, the
parties (and not the Clerk of Court) shall re-file that document on the docket
within 7 days of the Court’s order. Those documents shall be attached to a joint
stipulation which includes a chart that identifies the docket entries to which each
document corresponds.
13. Amended Complaints and Motions for Leave to Amend. In connection with all
amended complaints and motions seeking leave to amend pleadings, parties shall submit a
redline comparison with the operative pleading to
[email protected] upon filing of the
amended complaint or motion seeking leave to amend. This requirement does not apply to self-
represented parties.
14. Securities Cases. Within 14 days of service of the complaint (or consolidated
complaint), the plaintiff shall file a chart summarizing the information required by 15 U.S.C. §
78u-4(b)(1) and (2), specifically identifying the allegations in the operative complaint as follows:
4
Before seeking leave for additional pages, a party must meet and confer with all other
moving parties and file an omnibus motion that includes all requests. That is, there shall be only
one motion and one docket entry regarding requests for additional pages. Each party shall have
no more than one page therein to address the additional pages requested and basis for that
request.
13
(a) each statement alleged to have been false or misleading; (b) the speaker, date, and medium by
which the statement was made; (c) the reason(s) the statement was false or misleading when
made; and (d) the facts alleged to show that defendant(s) knew the statement false and/or
misleading. The chart should clearly identify which statements or omissions are attributable to
which defendants and, for each such defendant, the facts alleged which give rise to a strong
inference that the defendant acted with the required state of mind at the relevant time. The chart
must strictly adhere to the allegations in operative complaint and may not include any new
or supplemental information or explanation. The chart should be organized in the following
format:
Reasons
The Facts Giving Rise
False and Statements Were
Statement Speaker(s), to a Strong
Misleading False and
No. Date(s), and Inference of
Statements Misleading When
Medium Scienter
Made
1 When: [date] [Direct quotation [Summarize [Summarize
Where: [e.g. of the alleged arguments on falsity arguments on
Press release] false and with specific scienter with
Speakers: [e.g. misleading references to specific references
CEO] statements.] paragraphs in the to paragraphs in the
(Compl. ¶ __) complaint.] complaint.]
15. Communication with Court. Parties shall not contact Judge Gonzalez Rogers or her
chambers staff directly by telephone, email, or any other ex parte means, but may contact the
Courtroom Deputy at (510) 637-3540 with appropriate inquiries with counsel for all parties
included on the communication. Parties should list their email address as well as their telephone
numbers on their papers to facilitate communication with the Courtroom Deputy. All counsel
listed on the parties’ briefing must be fully apprised of the status of the pending matter and must
be authorized to respond to calendar settings by the Court.
16. Service of Standing Orders. Plaintiff (or in the case of removed actions, any removing
defendant) is directed to serve copies of this Standing Order in Civil Cases and the CAND CMC
Order at once upon all parties to their action, and upon those subsequently joined, in accordance
with the provisions of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rules 4 and 5, and to file with the Clerk
of the Court a certificate reflecting such service, in accordance with Civil Local Rule 5-6(a).
17. Settlements
a. Notices of Settlement. Any notice of settlement sent to the Court must be signed
by all parties to the settlement. Electronically filed notices shall be signed
pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i), including, if applicable, a filer’s attestation as
provided by Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3).
14
b. Request for Approval of Class Action Settlement: A motion for Court approval of
a class action settlement must provide the information described in the Northern
District of California’s Procedural Guidance for Class Action Settlements.
18. Unrepresented Parties. Parties representing themselves may wish to contact the Legal
Help Center, a free program that offers limited legal services to pro se litigants. The Legal Help
Center can provide information, advice, and basic legal help but cannot represent litigants as
their lawyers. Telephone appointments can be scheduled by emailing
[email protected] or by
calling (415) 782-8982. Additional information can be found online at
https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/pro-se-litigants/.
19. Pronouns/Titles. Parties and attorneys may indicate their pronouns and titles (e.g. Mr.,
Ms., Mx.) by including them in the name block or signature line of their pleadings, or by
submitting a letter directed to chambers.
20. ADA Litigation. General Order 56 sets forth various deadlines that parties must adhere
to in prosecuting claims pursuant to the ADA. Failure to comply with those deadlines may result
in sanctions, including dismissals for failure to prosecute. Any extensions of General Order 56’s
deadlines must be sought no later than one week in advance of the deadline and must be
supported by a concrete and particularized showing of good cause. Parties are advised that
stipulations or motions that fail to comply with this order may be summarily dismissed and/or
may lead to appropriate sanctions for non-compliance.
21. Formatting Considerations.
a. Footnotes: Footnotes shall be used sparingly, should never be less than 12-point
font, and must include a single paragraph space in between individual footnotes.
b. Incorporation by Reference and Record Citations: Incorporation by reference
is a narrow exception applicable to certain pleadings. Parties shall never
incorporate by reference prior argument submitted in the case. This practice
creates substantial administrative burdens and may be construed as circumventing
limits on pagination.
Furthermore, pincites to the record shall be as particular as possible for citations
to the record.
c. String Citations: String citations without any analysis or descriptive
parentheticals will be disregarded.
d. Electronic Filing: It is imperative that counsel know what their filings will look
like on ECF once submitted to the Court. Accordingly, counsel shall familiarize
themselves with this District’s guidance on e-filing available online at
https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/cases-e-filing/cm-ecf/. This applies even if
counsel will be relying extensively on staff to finish filings.
15
As a tutorial from the District shows, parties may name individual attachments
and documents. See https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/cases-e-filing/cm-ecf/e-
filing-my-documents/tutorial/. These names shall be as descriptive as possible to
help the Court identify pertinent documents on the docket. Parties are on notice
that the Court may strike burdensome and/or illegible filings and direct them to be
refiled consistent with the District’s guidance.
While not required, pro se litigants may sign up to be registered ECF users.
Failing to comply with filings requirements and the Civil Local Rules may result
in ECF filing privileges being revoked.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: June 22, 2026
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
United States District Judge
16
