The Law Mind

Judge Thompson's Patent Standing Order pdf, 54.47 KB — Thompson Trina L

N.D. Cal. Judge Practices (Thompson Trina L) · Thompson Trina L

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 STANDING ORDER FOR PATENT CASES BEFORE DISTRICT JUDGE TRINA L. THOMPSON 6 7 CONFORMITY TO RULES 8 1. Parties and counsel shall follow the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Patent 9 Local Rules, and the General Orders of the Northern District of California, except as superseded 10 by this Court’s standing orders. 11 REFERRAL TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE 12 Northern District of California United States District Court 2. Any dispute regarding any party’s patent disclosures pursuant to Patent Local Rules 13 3-1 to 3-5 typically is referred to the assigned Magistrate Judge. Requests to amend or strike a 14 party’s infringement contentions or invalidity contentions are likewise typically referred to the 15 assigned Magistrate Judge. 16 EXCHANGE OF EVIDENCE 17 3. The initial joint claim construction statement required by Patent Local Rule 4-3 18 must be truly joint. Disputed terms, phrases, and clauses must be designated as disputed. All 19 other terms will be presumed to be undisputed. For any term in dispute, the parties must agree on 20 the identity of the term. With regards to disputed terms, phrases, or clauses, the joint statement 21 will list each disputed term, phrase, or clause (listed by claim); each party’s proposed construction; 22 and support for each party’s proposed construction side by side. A model claim construction 23 statement is attached to this Order. 24 4. In the joint claim construction statement, parties must either cite to the docket 25 where copies of all patents in dispute can be found or attach copies of all patents in dispute. Parties 26 must also make a complete prosecution history for each patent available to the Court upon request. 27 // 28 1 CLAIM CONSTRUCTION 2 5. The Court will generally construe no more than 10 terms. If multiple terms present 3 identical issues, they may be grouped together or a representative term may be chosen, and each 4 group or representative term may be considered a single term for purposes of the ten-term limit. If 5 more than ten terms are at issue, the parties must meet and confer before the preparation of the 6 joint claim construction statement to narrow the number of terms that are to be construed by the 7 Court and shall jointly propose the ten terms requiring construction. 8 6. If a party has a good-faith basis for believing that more than ten terms need to be 9 construed, that party may request leave to designate additional terms for construction, pursuant to 10 Civil Local Rule 7-11. The requesting party must demonstrate good cause and explain why other 11 methods of limiting the terms at issue (such as the selection of representative terms or any 12 grouping of terms by issues presented) would be ineffective. The request must be filed no later Northern District of California United States District Court 13 than two weeks before the deadline for filing the joint claim construction statement. If good cause 14 is shown, the Court will either agree to construe all terms or schedule a later proceeding to 15 construe the remaining terms before trial. If more than ten terms are submitted for construction 16 without leave of court, the Court will construe only the first ten terms listed in the joint claim 17 construction statement and sanctions may be imposed. 18 CLAIM CONSTRUCTION HEARING 19 7. All hearings and appearances will be held in Courtroom 9 on the 19th Floor of the 20 United States Courthouse, 450 Golden Gate Avenue , San Francisco, California. 21 8. At least 30 days before the claim construction hearing, the parties shall, separately 22 or jointly, submit a pre-recorded tutorial of no more than 45 minutes per side that presents a short 23 summary and explanation of the technology at issue (see Patent Local Rule 4-5(a)), via portable 24 media (e.g., flash drive or DVD). Nonargumentative demonstrations and visual aids are 25 encouraged, and the Court generally prefers that someone other than counsel make the 26 presentation. No argument will be permitted. 27 9. Depending on the technology involved, the Court may determine that the assistance 28 of a neutral expert would be helpful. In that case, the Court may direct the parties to confer and, if 2 1 possible, reach an agreement as to three experts in the field who would be appropriate to act as a 2 neutral expert to assist the Court during the claim construction proceedings and/or the trial. The 3 Court will then choose one of the three to appoint as a neutral expert pursuant to Federal Rule of 4 Evidence 706. The parties will split the cost of the expert equally. 5 10. At the claim construction hearing, each side will generally be permitted 90 minutes 6 to present its argument. Claim construction will proceed like a typical oral argument, not a lecture. 7 All demonstrative exhibits, PowerPoints, and visual aids must be provided to the Court at least 2 8 days before the hearing. Demonstrative exhibits, PowerPoints, visual aids that are duplicative of 9 the arguments made in the parties’ claim construction briefs are strongly discouraged. 10 11. If either party wishes to present testimony at the claim construction hearing, 11 counsel must seek leave of Court by filing an administrative motion pursuant to Civil Local Rule 12 7-11 at least seven days in advance of the hearing. Northern District of California United States District Court 13 SUBSEQUENT CASE MANAGEMENT REPORT 14 12. Upon issuance of the claim construction ruling, the Court will also set a date for the 15 filing of a further joint case management status report. In that report, the parties must address the 16 following topics: 17 a. whether either party wishes the Court to certify the claim construction ruling 18 for immediate appeal to the Federal Circuit; 19 b. the filing of dispositive motions, and the timing of those motions; 20 c. if willful infringement has been asserted, whether the allegedly-infringing party 21 wishes to rely on the advice of counsel defense—if so, the parties should be 22 prepared to address proposals for resolving any attorney-client privilege issues 23 that arise, and whether the parties believe bifurcation of the trial into liability 24 and damages phases would be appropriate; 25 d. anticipated post-claim construction discovery; 26 e. proposed deadlines and court dates for the remainder of the case schedule; 27 f. any other pretrial matters; and 28 g. the progress of settlement discussions, if any. 3 1 The Court will review the reports and, if necessary, schedule a further case management 2 conference and enter any appropriate orders. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 Dated: August 22, 2025 5 TRINA L. THOMPSON 6 United States District Judge 7 8 9 10 11 12 Northern District of California United States District Court 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 1 SAMPLE CLAIM CONSTRUCTION STATEMENT 2 ’123 Patent 3 Claim Language (Disputed Plaintiff’s Proposed Defendant’s Proposed Terms in Bold) Construction and Evidence in Construction and Evidence in 4 Support Support 1. A method for counting a bird that quacks a bird that swims 5 ducks, comprising the steps of: INTRINSIC EVIDENCE: INTRINSIC EVIDENCE: 6 ’123 Patent col. __;___ (“a ’123 Patent col. _:__ (“Ducks [or] distinctive honking”); may be found on or near 7 Prosecution History at __ bodies of water.”); Prosecution ducks (“This patent is distinguished History at __ (“Water fowl are 8 from the prior art in that the particularly amenable to being Found in asserted claim quacking of the bird is counted by this method.”). 9 numbers: a, b, c, d featured.”). DICTIONARY/TREATISE 10 DICTIONARY/TREATISE DEFINITIONS: Random DEFINITIONS: Webster’s House Dictionary (“A duck: 11 Dictionary (“A duck: bird that an aquatic bird”). quacks”); Field Guide (“A bird 12 call: quack”). EXTRINSIC EVIDENCE: G. Northern District of California United States District Court Marx Depo. At __:__ (“Like a 13 EXTRINSIC EVIDENCE: duck to water.”); Daffy Decl. McDonald Depo. at __:__ at __. 14 (“I’d say the quacking makes it a duck.”); Donald Decl. at 15 __. 16 (Or any other substantively similar format that permits the Court to compare terms side by side.) 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 5
Official source: https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/standing-orders/Patent-Standing-Order-UP · retrieved 2026-07-23