The Law Mind

Standing Order Re Summary Judgment Motions — District Judge George H. Wu

C.D. Cal. Judge Order (District Judge George H. Wu) · District Judge George H. Wu

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 8 ) No. CV _____________________, ) 9 ) Standing Order Re Summary Judgment Plaintiff(s), ) Motions 10 ) v. ) 11 ) _____________________, ) 12 ) Defendant(s). ) 13 ) ) 14 1. You are instructed to read and to follow the requirements in Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 and 15 Central District of California Local Rules 56-1 through 56-3. 16 2. A moving party who files a reply/response to an opposition to a motion for summary 17 judgment (where the opposing party has filed a “Statement of Genuine Disputes”) shall file a 18 “Response to Statement of Genuine Disputes” using the format delineated below. Said Response 19 will include each initially designated uncontroverted fact (and supporting evidence), and, if the 20 opposing party has raised a dispute to the moving party’s fact, the moving party’s response (and 21 any supporting evidence) to rebut the opposing party’s contentions. For example: 22 23 Moving Party’s Uncontroverted Facts and Opposing Party’s Response to Cited Fact Supporting Evidence and Supporting Evidence 24 1. The accident occurred on June 1, 2013, 1. Undisputed 25 at 1:30 p.m. 26 Evidence: Deposition of Defendant at page 5; Declaration of Witness A at ¶ 3. 27 28 1 2. The signal light was green in Defendant’s 2. Disputed. direction when she entered into the Immediately before the accident, the 2 intersection and immediately before light was green in Plaintiff’s direction and Plaintiff’s vehicle “ran” the red light and Defendant ran the red light. 3 struck Defendant’s truck. Evidence: 6/8/13 Deposition of Plaintiff at 4 Evidence: 6/3/13 Deposition of Defendant at page 10. page 6. 5 6 2. Moving Party’s Response 7 On Page 10 of his deposition, Plaintiff merely states that he “believes” the light was green when he drove into the intersection. Also, on page 12, he admits that he had 8 consumed ten bottles of beer within one hour before the accident. Further, in the police report prepared at the scene by Officer Green within one half hour of the accident, Plaintiff 9 admitted that he couldn’t recall if the light was green when he entered into the intersection. See page 3 of Police Report No. A473501, attached as exhibit 101 to Defendant’s 6/3/13 10 Deposition. 11 3. Any evidentiary objections to materials filed in connection with summary judgment 12 motions (for which a party desires the Court to specifically make a ruling) shall be delineated in 13 a separate document (or documents) entitled "Request for Evidentiary Ruling on Specified 14 Objections." Each objection shall: (1) cite to the evidentiary item and state its precise location by 15 document name and Docket Number plus the page and line(s) where it appears, and (2) concisely 16 articulate the bases for the objection(s). Objections will only be raised as to evidence (not to 17 factual statements or factual characterizations in the opposing party's brief(s)). The Court will 18 disregard any evidentiary objection(s) that do not comply with this instruction. 19 20 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 23 24 DATED: GEORGE H. WU 25 United States District Judge 26 27 28 2
Official source: https://apps.cacd.uscourts.gov/Jps/honorable-george-h-wu · retrieved 2026-07-23