The Law Mind

OrderSettingSchedConfRVSD — District Judge James V. Selna

C.D. Cal. Judge Order (District Judge James V. Selna) · District Judge James V. Selna

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 *, ) CASE NO. CV*-JVS(*x) ) 12 Plaintiff(s), ) ORDER SETTING RULE 26(f) ) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE 13 v. ) ) 14 *, ) Defendant(s). ) Date: * 15 ) Time: 1:30 p.m. ) 16 ) _______________________________) 17 18 19 This case has been assigned to Judge James V. Selna. If plaintiff has 20 not already served the complaint (or any amendment thereto) on all defendants, 21 plaintiff shall promptly do so and shall file proofs of service within three days 22 thereafter. Defendants also shall timely serve and file their responsive pleadings 23 and file proofs of service within three days thereafter. 24 25 This matter is set for a scheduling conference on the above date. The 26 conference will be held pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P., Rule 16(b). The parties are 27 reminded of their obligations under Fed.R.Civ.P., Rule 26(a)(1) to disclose 28 information (without awaiting a discovery request) and under Rule 26(f) to confer on a discovery plan not later than twenty-one (21) days prior to the scheduling 1 conference and to file a report with the Court entitled “Joint Rule 26(f) Report” 2 not later than fourteen (14) days after they confer. Failure to comply with the 3 following requirements or to cooperate in the preparation of the Joint Rule 26(f) 4 Report may lead to the imposition of sanctions. 5 6 Unless there is a likelihood that upon motion by a party the 7 Court would order that any or all discovery is premature, it is advisable for 8 counsel to begin to conduct discovery actively before the Scheduling 9 Conference. At the very least, the parties shall comply fully with the letter 10 and spirit of Rule 26(a) and thereby obtain and produce most of what would 11 be produced in the early stage of discovery, because at the Scheduling 12 Conference the Court will impose tight deadlines to complete discovery. 13 14 1. Joint Rule 26(f) Report. 15 16 The Joint Rule 26(f) Report, which shall be filed not later than one 17 week before the scheduling conference, shall be drafted by plaintiff (unless the 18 parties agree otherwise), but shall be submitted and signed jointly. “Jointly” 19 contemplates a single report, regardless of how many separately-represented 20 parties there are. The Joint Rule 26(f) Report shall report on all matters 21 enumerated below, which include those required to be discussed by Rule 26(f) 22 and Local Rule 26: 23 24 a. Synopsis: a short synopsis (not to exceed two pages) of the main 25 claims, counterclaims, and/or affirmative defenses. 26 b. Legal issues: a brief description of the key legal issues. 27 c. Damages: the realistic range of provable damages. 28 2 1 d. Insurance: whether there is insurance coverage, the extent of 2 coverage, and whether there is a reservation of rights. 3 e. Motions: a statement of the likelihood of motions seeking to (i) add 4 other parties or claims or (ii) file amended pleadings or (iii) transfer 5 venue. 6 f. Discovery and experts: pursuant to Rule 26(f), state what, if any, 7 changes in the disclosures under R. 26(a) should be made; the 8 subjects on which discovery may be needed and whether discovery 9 should be conducted in phases or otherwise be limited; what 10 discovery has been conducted thus far; whether applicable 11 limitations should be changed or other limitations imposed; and 12 whether the Court should enter other orders. Please state how many 13 depositions each side will conduct. Also discuss the proposed time 14 of expert witness disclosures under F.R.Civ.P. 26(a)(2). 15 g. Dispositive motions: a description of the issues or claims that any 16 party believes may be determined by motion for summary judgment 17 or motion in limine. 18 h. Settlement and settlement mechanism: a statement of what 19 settlement discussions and/or written communications have occurred 20 (specifically excluding any statement of the terms discussed) and 21 a statement pursuant to the Local Rule 16-14.4 selecting a settlement 22 mechanism under that rule. 23 i. Trial estimate: a realistic estimate of the time required for trial and 24 whether trial will be by jury or by court. Each side should specify 25 (by number, not by name) how many witnesses it contemplates 26 calling. If the time estimate for trial given in the Rule 26(f) Joint 27 Report exceeds eight court days, counsel shall be prepared to discuss 28 in detail the estimate. 3 1 j. Timetable: complete of the Presumptive Schedule of Pretrial 2 Dates form attached as Exhibit A to this Order and attach it to 3 the Rule 26(f) report. Submission of a completed Exhibit A is 4 mandatory. The current entries in the “Weeks Before Trial” column 5 merely reflect what the Court believes are appropriate for many, if 6 not most, cases; those entries are not necessarily applicable to this 7 case, and the form is designed to enable counsel to request the Court 8 to set different last dates by which the key requirements must be 9 completed. Each side should write in the month, day and year it 10 requests for each event. E.g., for the expert discovery cut-off it 11 might be “10/7/02" for plaintiff and “10/28/02" for defendant, if they 12 cannot agree. At the conference, the Court will review this form 13 with counsel. Each entry proposing dates shall fall on a Monday, 14 except the trial date which is a Tuesday. In appropriate cases the 15 Court will order different dates after it hears from Counsel. The 16 proposed non-expert and expert discovery cut-off date means: the 17 last day by which all depositions must be completed and responses to 18 all previously-served written discovery must be provided. The 19 proposed cut-off date for motions means: the last date on which 20 motions may be heard, not noticed. 21 k. Other issues: a statement of any other issues affecting the status or 22 management of the case (e.g., unusually complicated technical or 23 technological issues, disputes over protective orders, extraordinarily 24 voluminous document production, non-English speaking witnesses, 25 discovery in foreign jurisdictions, etc.). 26 l. Conflicts: for conflict purposes, corporate parties must identify all 27 subsidiaries, parents and affiliates. 28 4 1 m. Patent cases: propose dates and methodology for claim construction 2 and Markman hearings. The Court intends to follow the process 3 outlined in the rules for patent cases which have been adopted by the 4 Northern District of California.1 At a minimum, the Court will 5 require the exchange of Proposed Terms and Claim Elements for 6 Construction, preparation and filing of a Joint Claim Construction 7 and Prehearing Statement, and simultaneous opening and reply 8 briefs. See Local Patent Rules, Northern District of California, 9 Rules 4-2, 4-3, 4-5. 10 n. Magistrates: Do the parties wish to have a Magistrate Judge preside? 11 Under 28 U.S.C. § 636, the parties may consent to have a Magistrate 12 Judge preside over all the proceedings, not just discovery. They may 13 pick any Magistrate Judge (not just the one assigned to this case) 14 from among those Magistrate Judges who accept these designations. 15 (They are identified on the Central District’s website, which also 16 contains the consent form.) 17 18 The Joint Rule 26(f) Report should set forth the above enumerated information 19 under section headings corresponding to this Order. 20 21 2. Scheduling Conference. 22 23 24 25 26 1 The rules can be found on the internet at 27 http://www.cand.uscourts.gov/CAND/LocalRul.nsf/fec20e529a5572f0882569b6006607e0/473 28 5a1c69bd18b418825695f00730cdd?OpenDocument 5 1 Scheduling Conferences will be held in the Ronald Reagan Building, 2 411 West Fourth Street, Court Room 10C, Santa Ana. Counsel shall comply with 3 the following: 4 5 a. Participation. The lead trial attorney must attend the Scheduling 6 Conference, unless excused for good cause shown in advance of the 7 Scheduling Conference. 8 b. Continuance. A continuance of the Scheduling Conference will be 9 granted only for good cause. 10 11 3. Protective Orders. 12 13 If you seek a protective order, propose it to opposing counsel before 14 the Scheduling Conference, if at all possible. Protective Order should be 15 submitted to the assigned Magistrate Judge for consideration. 16 17 4. Notice to be Provided by Counsel. 18 19 Plaintiff’s counsel or, if plaintiff is appearing pro se, defendant’s 20 counsel, shall provide this Order to any parties who first appear after the date of 21 this Order and to parties who are known to exist but have not yet entered 22 appearances. 23 24 5. Disclosures to Clients. 25 26 27 28 6 1 Counsel are ordered to deliver to their respective clients a copy of 2 this Order and of the Court’s Scheduling and Case Management Order, which 3 contains the schedule that the Court sets at the Scheduling Conference. 4 5 6. Court’s Website. 6 7 Copies of this and all other orders of this Court that may become 8 applicable to this case are available on the Central District of California website, 9 at “www.cacd.uscourts.gov,” under “Judge’s Procedures and Schedules.” Copies 10 of the Local Rules are available on the website.2 11 12 The Court thanks the parties and their counsel for their anticipated 13 cooperation in carrying out these requirements. 14 15 IT IS SO ORDERED. 16 17 Dated: _________________ ____________________________ James V. Selna 18 United States District Judge 19 Copies to: All Counsel of Record 20 21 22 23 24 2 25 They may also be purchased from one of the following: 26 Los Angeles Daily Journal West Publishing Company Metropolitan News 915 East First Street 50 West Kellogg Blvd. 210 South Spring Street 27 Los Angeles, CA 90012 St. Paul, MN 55164-9979 Los Angeles, CA 90012 28 H:\Civil\Orders\Scheduling Orders\OrderSettingSchedConfRVSD.wpd 7
Official source: https://apps.cacd.uscourts.gov/Jps/honorable-james-v-selna · retrieved 2026-07-23