The Law Mind

Order Setting Scheduling Conference with Worksheet UPDATED 09-24-2024 — District Judge Fred W. Slaughter

C.D. Cal. Judge Order (District Judge Fred W. Slaughter) · District Judge Fred W. Slaughter

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Case No.: 11 PLAINTIFF’S NAME, 12 Plaintiff/s, ORDER SETTING RULE 26(f) 13 v. SCHEDULING CONFERENCE 14 15 DEFENDANT’S NAME, Date: 16 Defendant/s. Time: Courtroom: 10D 17 18 19 20 21 22 PLEASE READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT GOVERNS THIS 23 CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. 24 This case has been assigned to Judge Fred W. Slaughter. This matter is set for a 25 Scheduling Conference on the above date in Courtroom 10D of the Ronald Reagan 26 Federal Building and United States Courthouse, 411 West 4th Street, Santa Ana, 27 California 92701. If Plaintiff has not already served the operative complaint on all 28 Defendants, Plaintiff shall do so promptly and shall file proofs of service within three 1 1 (3) days thereafter. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4; L.R. 4. Defendants shall also timely file 2 and serve their responsive pleadings and file proofs of service within three (3) days 3 thereafter, in compliance with the requirements of Local Rule 5-3.2. At the 4 Scheduling Conference, the court will dismiss all remaining fictitiously named 5 Defendants. The court will also set a date by which motions to amend the pleadings 6 or add parties must be heard. 7 The Scheduling Conference will be held pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 8 Procedure 16(b). The parties are reminded of their obligations under Federal Rule of 9 Civil Procedure 26(f) to confer on a discovery plan no later than twenty-one (21) days 10 before the Scheduling Conference. The court encourages counsel to agree to begin to 11 conduct discovery actively before the Scheduling Conference. At the very least, the 12 parties shall comply fully with the letter and spirit of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 13 26(a) and thereby obtain and produce most of what would be produced in the 14 early stages of discovery, because at the Scheduling Conference the court will impose 15 strict deadlines to complete discovery. 16 This court does not exempt parties appearing pro se from compliance with 17 any of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or the Central District of California’s 18 Local Rules, including Local Rule 16. See L. R. 1-3, 83-2.2.3. “Counsel,” as used 19 in this Order, includes parties appearing pro se. 20 I. Joint Rule 26(f) Report 21 The Joint Rule 26(f) Report must be filed no later than seven (7) days after the 22 parties meet and confer and fourteen (14) days before the Scheduling Conference. 23 The court discourages the submission of courtesy chambers copies of Joint Rule 26(f) 24 Reports that have been electronically filed. 25 The Joint Rule 26(f) Report shall be drafted by Plaintiff’s counsel or, if the 26 parties otherwise agree, by Defendant’s counsel. If the Plaintiff is appearing pro se, 27 the Joint Rule 26(f) Report shall be drafted by Defendant’s counsel unless Plaintiff 28 prefers to do so. In all circumstances, the Joint Rule 26(f) Report must be signed 2 1 jointly. “Jointly” means a single report, regardless of how many separately 2 represented parties are involved in the case. The Joint Rule 26(f) Report shall specify 3 the date of the Scheduling Conference on the caption page. The Joint Rule 26(f) 4 Report shall address the matters set forth in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f) and 5 Local Rule 26, some of which are enumerated below, and shall also contain the 6 following: 7 a. Statement of the Case: A short statement by each party, not to exceed 8 two (2) pages, setting forth that party’s factual summary of the case, 9 including the basis for any claims, counterclaims, or defenses. 10 b. Subject Matter Jurisdiction: A statement of the specific basis for 11 federal jurisdiction, including supplemental jurisdiction. If there is a 12 federal question, cite the federal law under which the question arises. 13 c. Legal Issues: A brief description of the key legal issues, including any 14 unusual substantive, procedural, or evidentiary issues. 15 d. Damages: The realistic range of provable damages. 16 e. Parties and Evidence: A list of parties, percipient witnesses, and key 17 documents with respect to the main issues in the case. For conflict 18 purposes, corporate parties must identify all subsidiaries, parents, and 19 affiliates. The parties should discuss the likelihood of appearance of 20 additional parties, if any. 21 f. Insurance: Whether there is insurance coverage, the extent of coverage, 22 and whether there is a reservation of rights. 23 g. Manual for Complex Litigation: Whether all or part of the procedures 24 of the Manual for Complex Litigation should be utilized. 25 h. Motions: A statement of the likelihood of motions seeking to add other 26 parties or claims, file amended pleadings, transfer venue, or challenge the 27 court’s jurisdiction. 28 3 1 i. Dispositive Motions: A description of the issues or claims any party 2 believes may be determined by a motion to dismiss or motion for 3 summary judgment. Please refer to the court’s Standing Order for 4 specific guidelines governing summary judgment motions. 5 j. Status of Discovery: A discussion of the present state of discovery, 6 including a summary of completed discovery, and any current or 7 anticipated disputes. 8 k. Discovery Plan: A detailed discovery plan, as contemplated by Federal 9 Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f). State what, if any, changes in the 10 disclosures under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a) should be made, 11 the subjects on which discovery may be needed, whether discovery 12 should be conducted in phases or otherwise be limited, whether 13 applicable limitations should be changed or other limitations imposed, 14 and whether the court should enter other orders. A statement that 15 discovery will be conducted as to all claims and defenses or other vague 16 description is not acceptable. 17 l. Discovery Cut-off: A proposed discovery cut-off date. This means the 18 final day for completion of discovery, including resolution of all 19 discovery motions. 20 m. Expert Discovery: Proposed dates for initial and rebuttal expert witness 21 disclosures and expert discovery cut-off under Federal Rule of Civil 22 Procedure 26(a)(2). 23 n. Settlement Conference and Alternative Dispute Resolution (“ADR”): 24 A statement of what settlement negotiations have occurred, excluding 25 any statement of the terms discussed. If a Notice to Parties of Court- 26 Directed ADR Program (form ADR-08) was filed in this case, the court 27 will refer it to the Magistrate Judge, the Court Mediation Panel, or private 28 mediation at the parties’ expense. The parties should indicate their 4 1 preference in their Joint Rule 26(f) Report. No case will proceed to trial 2 unless all parties, including an officer with full settlement authority for 3 corporate parties, have appeared personally at an ADR proceeding. 4 o. Trial Estimate: A realistic estimate, in days, of the court time required 5 for trial and whether trial will be by jury or by the court. Each side 6 should specify the number, and not the names, of witnesses it 7 contemplates calling. If the time estimate for trial given in the Joint Rule 8 26(f) Report exceeds four (4) court days, counsel must be prepared to 9 discuss in detail the basis for the estimate. 10 p. Trial Counsel: The name(s) of counsel who will try the case. 11 q. Magistrate Judge: Whether the parties agree to try the case before a 12 Magistrate Judge. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 and General Order 05-07 13 (also referred to as General Order 194), the parties may consent to have a 14 Magistrate Judge preside over all proceedings, including jury trials.1 The 15 parties may choose any Magistrate Judge identified on the Central 16 District’s website. The consent form may also be found on the Central 17 District’s website.2 18 r. Independent Expert or Master: Whether the court should consider 19 appointing a master pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 53 or an 20 independent scientific expert at the parties’ expense. The appointment of 21 a master may be especially appropriate in cases where the parties 22 anticipate substantial discovery disputes, numerous claims to be 23 construed in connection with a motion for summary judgment, a lengthy 24 Daubert hearing, or resolution of a difficult computation of damages. 25 26 1 A list of magistrate judges in the Central District of California can be found at 27 https://www.cacd.uscourts.gov/judgesschedules-procedures. 2 The Statement of Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge (CV-11D) can be 28 found at https://www.cacd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/forms/CV-011D/CV-11D.pdf. 5 1 s. Schedule Worksheet: The parties must make every effort to agree on all 2 pretrial and trial dates. The parties must submit a completed copy of the 3 attached Schedule of Pretrial and Trial Dates Worksheet (“Worksheet”) 4 with their Joint Rule 26(f) Report. The entries in the “Time 5 Computation” column reflect what the court believes is appropriate for 6 most cases and will allow the court to rule on potentially dispositive 7 motions sufficiently in advance of the Final Pretrial Conference. 8 However, the parties may propose earlier dates by which the key 9 requirements must be completed. Each date should be stated as month, 10 day, and year (e.g., 2/10/2022). Hearings shall be held on Thursdays 11 starting at 10:00 a.m. Other deadlines not involving the court may be 12 scheduled any day of the week. The parties must avoid holidays. The 13 court may order different dates than those required. The discovery cut- 14 off date is the last day by which all depositions must be completed, 15 responses to previously served written discovery requests must be 16 provided, and motions concerning discovery disputes must be heard, not 17 filed. In other words, any motion challenging the adequacy of discovery 18 responses must be filed timely, served, and calendared sufficiently in 19 advance of the discovery cut-off date to permit the responses to be 20 obtained before that date, if the motion is granted. If the parties wish the 21 court to set dates in addition to those on the Worksheet, they may so 22 request by a separate stipulation and proposed order. Additional hearings 23 are often appropriate for class actions, patent cases, and cases for benefits 24 under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”). 25 t. Class Actions: If the action is a putative class action, the parties are to 26 provide a proposed briefing schedule for the motion for class 27 certification. The schedule must provide for at least twenty-one (21) 28 days between the filing of the reply and the hearing and should include a 6 1 discovery cut-off date in advance of the date on which the motion must 2 be filed. The court expects the parties to act diligently and begin 3 discovery immediately, because the motion must be filed no later than 4 one-hundred-twenty (120) days from the date originally set for the 5 Scheduling Conference, unless the court orders otherwise. In other 6 words, a continuance of the date for the Scheduling Conference will not 7 extend the time to file the motion for class certification. 8 u. Other Issues: A statement of any other issues affecting the status or 9 management of the case, such as unusually complicated technical or 10 technological issues, disputes over protective orders, extraordinarily 11 voluminous document production, witnesses who will need the assistance 12 of a court interpreter, reasonable ADA accommodations, discovery in 13 foreign jurisdictions, the applicability of foreign law, the advanced age or 14 health of parties or key witnesses, and any proposals concerning 15 severance, bifurcation, or other ordering of proof. 16 The Joint Rule 26(f) Report should set forth the above-described information 17 under section headings corresponding to those in this Order. 18 II. Scheduling Conference 19 a. Continuance: A request to continue the Scheduling Conference will be 20 granted only for good cause. The parties should refer to the court’s 21 Standing Order for additional guidance regarding requests for 22 continuance. 23 b. Vacating Scheduling Conference: The court may vacate the Scheduling 24 Conference and issue the Scheduling Order based solely on the parties’ 25 Joint Rule 26(f) Report pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 16(b). 27 28 7 1 c. Participation: If the court elects to conduct a Scheduling Conference, 2 lead trial counsel must attend unless excused by the court for good cause 3 before the conference is scheduled to begin. 4 d. Failure to Submit a Joint Rule 26(f) Report: The failure to submit a 5 Joint Rule 26(f) Report in advance of the Scheduling Conference or the 6 failure to attend the Scheduling Conference may result in dismissal of the 7 action, striking of the answer and entry of default, and/or imposition of 8 sanctions. 9 III. Notice to Be Provided by Counsel 10 Plaintiff’s counsel or, if Plaintiff is appearing pro se, Defendant’s counsel, shall 11 provide this Order to any parties who first appear after the date of this Order and to 12 parties who are known to exist but have not yet entered appearances. 13 IV. Disclosures to Clients 14 Counsel are ordered to deliver to their clients a copy of this Order. 15 V. Court’s Website 16 This and all other generally applicable orders of this court are available on the 17 Central District of California’s website3 and on Judge Slaughter’s webpage.4 The 18 Local Rules are also available on the Central District of California’s website.5 19 The court thanks the parties and their counsel for their anticipated cooperation. 20 IT IS SO ORDERED. 21 22 Dated: ___________ _________________________________ 23 HONORABLE FRED W. SLAUGHTER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 24 25 26 3 The website for the Central District of California can be found at http://www.cacd.uscourts.gov. 4 Judge Slaughter’s webpage can be found at https://www.cacd.uscourts.gov/honorable-fred-w- 27 slaughter. 5 28 Copies of the Local Rules are available at https://www.cacd.uscourts.gov/court-procedures/local- rules. 8 JUDGE FRED W. SLAUGHTER SCHEDULE OF PRETRIAL AND TRIAL DATES WORKSHEET Please complete this worksheet jointly and file it with your Joint Rule 26(f) Report. The parties must make every effort to agree on dates or the court will set them. Case No. Case Name: Pl(s)’ Date Def(s)’ Date Court Order Trial and Final Pretrial Conference Dates mm/dd/yyyy mm/dd/yyyy mm/dd/yyyy Check one: [ ] Jury Trial or [ ] Bench Trial [ ] Jury Trial [Tuesday at 8:00 a.m., within 18 months after Complaint filed] [ ] Bench Trial Estimated Duration: _______ Days _______ Days Final Pretrial Conference (“FPTC”) [L.R. 16], Hearing on Motions in Limine [Thursday at 8:30 a.m., at least 19 days before trial] Event1 Weeks Pl(s)’ Date Def(s)’ Date Court Order Note: Hearings shall be on Thursdays at 10:00 a.m. Before mm/dd/yyyy mm/dd/yyyy mm/dd/yyyy Other dates can be any day of the week. FPTC Last Date to Hear Motion to Amend Pleadings /Add Parties [Thursday] Non-Expert Discovery Cut-Off 26 (no later than deadline for filing dispositive motions) Expert Disclosure (Initial) 24 Expert Disclosure (Rebuttal) 22 Expert Discovery Cut-Off 202 Last Date to Hear Motions [Thursday] • Motion for Summary Judgment due at least 6 weeks before hearing • All other motions due at least 4 weeks before hearing 12 • Opposition due 2 weeks after Motion is filed • Reply due 1 week after Opposition is filed Deadline to Complete Settlement Conference [L.R. 16-15] [ ] 1. Magistrate Select one: [ ] 1. Magistrate Judge 10 [ ] 2. Panel [ ] 2. Court’s Mediation Panel [ ] 3. Private [ ] 3. Private Mediation Trial Filings (first round) • Motions in Limine with Proposed Orders • Memoranda of Contentions of Fact and Law [L.R. 16-4] • Witness Lists [L.R. 16-5] • Joint Exhibit List [L.R. 16-6.1] • Joint Status Report Regarding Settlement 3 • Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law [L.R. 52] (bench trial only) • Declarations containing Direct Testimony, if ordered (bench trial only) Trial Filings (second round) • Oppositions to Motions in Limine • Joint Proposed Final Pretrial Conference Order [L.R. 16-7] • Joint/Agreed Proposed Jury Instructions (jury trial only) • Disputed Proposed Jury Instructions (jury trial only) 2 • Joint Proposed Verdict Forms (jury trial only) • Joint Proposed Statement of the Case (jury trial only) • Proposed Additional Voir Dire Questions, if any (jury trial only) • Evidentiary Objections to Declarations of Direct Testimony (bench trial only) 1 The parties may seek dates for additional events by filing a separate Stipulation and Proposed Order. Class actions, patent, and ERISA cases may need to vary from the above. 2 The parties may wish to consider cutting off expert discovery prior to the deadline for filing a motion for summary judgment. 9
Official source: https://apps.cacd.uscourts.gov/Jps/honorable-fred-w-slaughter · retrieved 2026-07-23