The Law Mind

Order Setting Scheduling Conference w Exhibit A 05.29.26 — District Judge Josephine L. Staton

C.D. Cal. Judge Order (District Judge Josephine L. Staton) · District Judge Josephine L. Staton

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 Case No.: SACV - JLS(XXXx) 12 Plaintiff/s, ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING 13 v. CONFERENCE FOR [HEARING 14 DATE] 10:30 A.M., COURTROOM 8A, FIRST STREET COURTHOUSE 15 16 Defendant/s. 17 18 Judge Staton’s Procedures web page is incorporated in this Order. 19 The parties and counsel are ORDERED to review and comply with those 20 procedures and notices, which may be accessed at: 21 https://apps.cacd.uscourts.gov/Jps/honorable-josephine-l-staton 22 This case has been assigned to Judge Josephine L. Staton. If plaintiff has not 23 already served the complaint (or any amendment thereto) on all defendants, 24 plaintiff shall promptly do so and shall file proofs of service within three (3) days 25 thereafter. Defendants also shall timely serve and file their responsive pleadings 26 and file proofs of service within three days thereafter. 27 This case is set for a scheduling conference under Federal Rule of Civil 28 Procedure 16(b) on the date and time stated in the caption of this Order, in www.cacd.uscourts.gov 1 [email protected] 1 Courtroom 8A of the First Street Courthouse, 350 West 1st Street, Los Angeles, 2 California. Unless excused for good cause shown in advance of the scheduling 3 conference, lead counsel shall appear at the scheduling conference and at all 4 pretrial hearings fully informed concerning the facts of the case. If the Court 5 determines that a Scheduling Order can be issued based on the Joint Rule 26(f) 6 Report, the scheduling conference will be vacated. 7 8 Attached to this Order, as Exhibit A, are the Court’s presumptive dates. 9 Parties wishing to deviate from this schedule shall provide the Court with 10 reasons for each suggested change. A Joint Rule 26(f) Report that is filed 11 without a fully completed Exhibit A will be rejected by the Court and may subject 12 the parties to sanctions. 13 14 In civil cases, the Court defers setting a trial date and an exhibit conference 15 date until the parties appear for the Final Pretrial Conference. The parties are 16 expected to address these issues at the Final Pretrial Conference; therefore, the 17 parties are directed to confer before the Final Pretrial Conference to identify 18 mutually agreeable trial date(s) within the 90 days following the Final Pretrial 19 Conference. Where the Court’s trial calendar permits, the Court will set the trial 20 for a date agreed upon by the parties. 21 22 1. Joint Rule 26(f) Report 23 As provided in Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f), the parties shall meet at least 21 days 24 before the scheduling conference and file a Joint 26(f) Report (“Report”) no later 25 than 14 days before the date set for the scheduling conference. The Report shall be 26 drafted by plaintiff (unless the parties agree otherwise), but shall be submitted and 27 signed jointly. “Jointly” contemplates a single report, regardless of how many 28 separately represented parties there are. www.cacd.uscourts.gov 2 [email protected] 1 The Report shall discuss the issues described below. Counsel are to ensure 2 that their discussions of these issues fully address the topics identified by Federal 3 Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f)(3)(A)-(F) and Local Rule 26-1(a)-(f). 4 a. Statement of the case: a short synopsis (not to exceed two 5 pages) of the main claims, counterclaims, and affirmative defenses. 6 b. Legal issues: a brief description of the key legal issues, 7 including any unusual substantive, procedural, or evidentiary issues. 8 c. Damages: the realistic range of provable damages. 9 d. Insurance: whether there is insurance coverage, the extent of 10 coverage, and whether there is a reservation of rights. 11 e. Motions: a statement of the likelihood of motions seeking to 12 add other parties or claims (see Local Rule 26-1(e)), file amended pleadings, to 13 dismiss for lack of jurisdiction, or to transfer venue. 14 f. Complexity: a discussion regarding the complexity of the 15 case, and whether all or part of the procedures of the Manual for Complex 16 Litigation should be utilized. See Local Rule 26-1(a). 17 g. Status of Discovery: a report regarding the current status of 18 discovery, including whether initial disclosures have been made and a summary of 19 any completed discovery. 20 h. Discovery Plan: The parties must set forth a detailed discovery 21 plan that discusses all the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f)(3)(A)-(F) topics, 22 including topics related to initial disclosures, the anticipated subjects of discovery, 23 the time needed for discovery, issues related to electronically stored information 24 (“ESI”), issues related to privileged materials, whether changes to limitations on 25 discovery should be made, issues related to protective orders, and any other Rule 26 16(b) or 16(c) issues. The parties must propose a discovery cutoff date for the 27 completion of fact discovery. 28 www.cacd.uscourts.gov 3 [email protected] 1 i. Expert Discovery: The parties shall discuss the timing of 2 expert disclosures and discovery. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2); Local Rule 26-1(f). 3 j. Dispositive motions: The parties shall set forth a description of 4 the issues or claims that any party believes may be determined by motion for 5 summary judgment or partial summary judgment. See Local Rule 26-1(b). 6 k. Alternative Dispute Resolution (“ADR”) Procedure 7 Selection: The parties must select either ADR Procedure No. 2 (Court Mediation 8 Panel) or ADR Procedure No. 3 (private mediation); ADR Procedure No. 1 9 (conference with the magistrate judge) may not be selected by the parties. See 10 generally General Order 11-10, § 5.1; Local Rule 26-1(c). For more information 11 about the Court’s ADR Program, please visit the “ADR” section of the Court 12 website, http://www.cacd.uscourts.gov. 13 l. Settlement Efforts: Without disclosing the substance of the 14 communications, the parties shall advise the Court regarding whether they have 15 discussed settlement or had written communications regarding settlement. The 16 parties are advised that no case will proceed to trial unless all parties, including the 17 principals of all corporate parties, have appeared personally at a mediation. 18 m. Preliminary Trial Estimate: The parties must provide a 19 realistic estimate of the time required for trial. See Local Rule 26-1(d). The 20 parties’ estimate is for planning purposes only; the Court may allot fewer days for 21 trial. The parties shall specify whether trial will be by jury or to the Court, and 22 each side must specify the number of witnesses it expects to call. 23 n. Trial counsel: the name(s) of the attorney(s) who will try the 24 case. 25 o. Independent Expert or Master: The parties must advise the 26 Court whether this is a case in which a master pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 27 Procedure 53 or an independent scientific expert should be appointed. The 28 appointment of a master may be appropriate if there are likely to be substantial www.cacd.uscourts.gov 4 [email protected] 1 discovery disputes, numerous claims to be construed in connection with a 2 summary judgment motion, a lengthy Daubert hearing, or resolution of a difficult 3 computation of damages. 4 p. Other issues: a statement of any other issues affecting the 5 status or management of the case (e.g., unusually complicated technical or 6 technological issues, disputes over protective orders, extraordinarily voluminous 7 document production, non-English speaking witnesses, discovery in foreign 8 jurisdictions, etc.) and any proposals concerning severance, bifurcation, or other 9 ordering of proof. 10 11 2. Notice to be Provided by Counsel 12 Plaintiff’s counsel shall provide this Order to any parties who first appear 13 after the date of this Order and to parties who are known to exist but have not yet 14 entered appearances. If plaintiff is appearing pro se, but defendant is represented 15 by counsel, defendant’s counsel shall provide this notice. 16 17 3. Disclosures to Clients 18 Counsel are ordered to deliver to their respective clients a copy of this 19 Order, the Court’s trial order, and the Scheduling Order. 20 21 4. Class Actions 22 The parties are directed to the portion of Judge Staton’s Procedures web 23 page (https://apps.cacd.uscourts.gov/Jps/honorable-josephine-l-staton) regarding 24 class action scheduling issues. As explained in further detail on the web page, the 25 parties are directed to discuss class action scheduling issues in their Joint Rule 26 26(f) Report. 27 28 www.cacd.uscourts.gov 5 [email protected] 1 5. Utility Patent Cases 2 a. Presumptive Schedule and Exhibit B: In patent cases, the Court 3 intends generally to follow the Northern District of California Patent Local Rules. 4 However, the Court’s presumptive schedule differs from that set forth in the 5 Northern District Rules and, where it does, the Court’s presumptive schedule 6 controls. In patent cases, counsel should review, prepare, and attach the Court’s 7 Joint Rule 26(f) Report utility patent-specific Exhibit B (in lieu of the Exhibit A). 8 Exhibit B is available on Judge Staton’s Procedures web page. 9 b. Technology Tutorial: Because the Court may be unfamiliar with 10 the technology underlying many litigated patents, the parties should consider the 11 most efficient and effective manner in which to educate the Court regarding that 12 technology. Counsel must file a joint status report setting forth their proposal(s) no 13 later than 60 days in advance of the claim construction hearing. If the Court deems 14 it appropriate, the Court will schedule an in-Court technology tutorial or make 15 other appropriate orders. Counsel are strongly encouraged to present any 16 educational materials in a manner that is free of advocacy and unencumbered by 17 each side’s respective litigation position(s). 18 The Court thanks the parties and their counsel for their anticipated 19 cooperation in complying with the requirements set forth in this Order. 20 IT IS SO ORDERED. 21 Dated: 22 JOSEPHINE L. STATON 23 United States District Judge 24 25 Revised: May 29, 2026 26 27 28 www.cacd.uscourts.gov 6 [email protected] EXHIBIT A PROPOSED SCHEDULE OF PRETRIAL AND TRIAL DATES CASE NAME: CASE NO: Plaintiff(s) Defendant(s) Matter Deadline Request Request Last Day to File Motions to Scheduling Add Parties and Amend Conference Date Pleadings plus 8 weeks Fact Discovery Depending on case Cut-Off complexity, generally a Friday between 6-9 months after the Scheduling Conference Last Day to File Motions 2 weeks after Fact (except Daubert and all Discovery Cut-Off other Motions in Limine) Last Day to Serve Initial 2 weeks after Fact Expert Reports Discovery Cut-Off Last Day to Serve Rebuttal 6 weeks after Fact Expert Reports Discovery Cut-Off Last Day to Conduct 9 weeks after Fact Settlement Proceedings Discovery Cut-Off Expert Discovery Cut-Off 10 weeks after Fact Discovery Cut-Off Last Day to file Daubert 1 week after Expert Motions: Discovery Cut-Off Last Day to File Motions in 4 weeks before the Limine: FPTC Final Pre-Trial Conference 22 weeks after Fact (Friday at 10:30 a.m.) Discovery Cut-Off Revised: May 29, 2026 www.cacd.uscourts.gov 7 [email protected]
Official source: https://apps.cacd.uscourts.gov/Jps/honorable-josephine-l-staton · retrieved 2026-07-23