The Law Mind

MSJ Order (1.6.26) — District Judge Stanley Blumenfeld Jr.

C.D. Cal. Judge Order (District Judge Stanley Blumenfeld Jr.) · District Judge Stanley Blumenfeld Jr.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 , Case No. 11 Plaintiff(s), ORDER RE MOTIONS FOR 12 SUMMARY JUDGMENT 13 v. [Updated 1/6/26] 14 , 15 Defendant(s). 16 17 READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY BECAUSE IT CONTROLS THIS CASE 18 AND DIFFERS IN PART FROM THE LOCAL RULES. 19 20 TABLE OF CONTENTS 21 22 1. General Requirements 23 2. Joint Appendix of Facts (JAF) 24 3. Joint Appendix of Evidence (JAE) 25 4. Joint Appendix of Objections (JAO) 26 5. Failure to Comply 27 28 1 1. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 2 a. Joint Brief. The parties shall work cooperatively to submit a single joint 3 brief for all motions for summary judgment or adjudication (MSJs) 4 brought by all moving parties. The joint brief shall be organized by 5 issue, presenting the parties’ competing positions on an issue-by-issue 6 basis. For each issue, the moving party shall present legal argument and 7 citation to the Joint Appendix of Facts (JAF), see infra, followed 8 immediately by the opposition’s response that similarly must be 9 supported by legal argument and citation to the JAF. 10 b. Form. Because summary judgment motions are fact-intensive, parties 11 should prepare papers in a fashion that will assist the Court in 12 considering the material (e.g., through use of tabs, tables of contents, 13 headings, indices). 14 c. Word Limit. Each separately represented party shall be limited to 7,000 15 words, exclusive of tables of contents and authorities. Leave for 16 additional briefing will be given only in extraordinary cases. Each party 17 is limited to the use of a total of eight footnotes. 18 d. Timing. The Court expects the parties to agree to a filing schedule for an 19 MSJ, which must be filed in compliance with the deadlines set forth in 20 § 1(e). The parties should not wait until the last day to file; on the other 21 hand, the filing of clearly premature motions requiring a continuance to 22 permit discovery wastes resources. 23 e. Briefing Schedule. If multiple parties are moving for summary 24 judgment, the parties should designate only one party as the moving party 25 for purposes of the briefing schedule. 1 The schedule for the joint brief 26 shall be as follows: 27 1 The Court expects the parties to work together professionally and agree on which 28 2 1 i. Meet and Confer. For an MSJ to be timely filed, the moving party 2 must arrange for an in-person meeting or videoconference to take 3 place no later than 53 days before the motion hearing cutoff set 4 forth in the case management order (CMO). The parties shall 5 thoroughly discuss each issue to be raised and the law and 6 evidence relevant to that issue. A thorough discussion serves a 7 critical function: It often narrows the issues to be adjudicated, and 8 it allows the parties to squarely and fully address the actual issues 9 requiring resolution. 10 ii. Moving Portion. No later than seven days after the meet and 11 confer, the moving party shall provide to the opposing party an 12 electronic copy of the moving party’s portion of the joint brief, 13 together with the moving party’s portion of the JAF and Joint 14 Appendix of Evidence (JAE), see infra. 15 iii. Opposing Portion. No later than 14 days after receiving the 16 moving party’s papers, the opposing party shall provide to the 17 moving party an electronic copy of the integrated motion, which 18 shall include the opposing party’s portion of the joint brief, JAF, 19 and JAE. At this point, the opposing party should sign the joint 20 brief. 21 iv. Filing of Joint Brief. After receiving the integrated version of the 22 motion and related papers, the moving party shall finalize it for 23 filing without making any further revisions to the joint brief and 24 appendices, except (1) by agreement (e.g., to correct an error or 25 26 party should be designated the moving party. If the parties are unable to agree, the defendant shall be deemed the moving party. If different parties seek summary 27 judgment on different issues, the parties may agree to modify the pre-filing deadlines 28 in the briefing schedule without leave of Court if and only if (1) all parties agree to the modifications and (2) the summary judgment motion is timely filed under the CMO. 3 1 remove an issue as to which the parties resolved their dispute) or 2 (2) to note in the JAF (in the format described in the instructions 3 below) whether any facts added by the opposing party are disputed 4 or undisputed. Once finalized, the moving party’s counsel shall 5 sign and electronically file the joint brief, JAF, and JAE no later 6 than four days after receiving the opposing party’s signed copy. 7 The joint brief shall be accompanied by a notice of motion and 8 motion for summary judgment and shall be calendared pursuant to 9 the Local Rules on an available date no later than the motion 10 hearing cutoff in the CMO. 11 f. Reply Memorandum. After the joint brief is filed, the moving party 2 12 may separately file a reply memorandum of points and authorities, not 13 exceeding 3,000 words, no later than 14 days before the scheduled 14 hearing date. The moving party may not use this filing to supplement the 15 JAF or the JAE in any way. No additional briefing or filing in support of 16 or in opposition to the MSJ is permitted. 17 g. Multiple Motions Prohibited. No more than one joint motion may be 18 filed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 56, whether brought as a motion for summary 19 judgment or summary adjudication, without leave of Court. In the rare 20 case in which leave of Court is sought, the parties shall file a joint 21 noticed motion setting forth their respective positions on the existence of 22 good cause for the filing of multiple motions. 23 2. JOINT APPENDIX OF FACTS (JAF) 24 The joint brief shall be accompanied by a single statement of undisputed and 25 disputed facts contained in a JAF presented in a table. This Court’s requirements for 26 27 28 2 In the case of multiple moving parties, each moving party may file a supplemental memorandum that replies only to the issue(s) upon which the party moved. 4 1 the JAF supersede the requirements in Local Rules 56-1, 56-2, and 56-3 for a 2 “Statement of Uncontroverted Facts,” which the parties need not additionally file. 3 a. Table Format. The JAF table shall contain four columns. 4 i. Column No. 1. The first column shall contain the number of the 5 fact alleged to be undisputed. All asserted undisputed facts shall 6 be sequentially numbered and divided into sections according to 7 the element of proof to which the facts relate. 8 ii. Column No. 2. The second column shall contain a plain statement 9 of the fact. 10  Facts shall not be compound (e.g., Mike and Jane signed a 11 contract, and Jane mailed the contract in May 2017). 12  Each fact must be stated separately in its own row as shown 13 below. 14  Neither legal arguments nor conclusions constitute facts. 15  Facts shall not be repeated if they relate to multiple claims 16 for multiple elements of proof. The first reference to a fact in 17 the JAF shall serve and—through incorporation by 18 reference—can be cited to support all subsequent claims 19 (e.g., “See JAF 1–5”). 20 iii. Column No. 3. The third column shall contain a citation to 21 admissible evidence that supports the proffered fact; the evidence 22 cited must be included in the JAE. 23 iv. Column No. 4. The fourth column shall contain the opposing 24 party’s response to the fact alleged to be undisputed: (1) stating 25 that the fact is undisputed or disputed, (2) briefly stating why the 26 opposing party disputes the fact, (3) citing with specificity the 27 evidence that refutes the fact, and (4) explaining how the cited 28 5 1 evidence refutes the fact; the evidence cited must be included in 2 the JAE. 3 b. Headers. Where feasible, parties should use headers to group facts 4 relevant to a particular issue. The table below illustrates the format that 5 must be used. 6 7 Fact Supporting Pl.’s Response SUF No. Evidence 8 Issue No. 1. Plaintiff’s Claim for Breach of Contract is Barred by the Statute 9 of Limitations. 10 1. Mike and Jane Smith Decl. ¶ 5, Ex. Disputed. Jane testified 11 signed a contract 6. that the contract was for a for the sale and lease, not a purchase. Jane 12 purchase of Depo. 29:4-16, Ex. 1. 13 property. 14 2. Jane mailed the Smith Decl. ¶ 8, Ex. Disputed in Part. Jane contract in May 21. testified she mailed the 15 2017. contract in January 2017. 16 Jane Depo. 3:4-10, Ex. 1. 17 c. Good-Faith Preparation. The parties shall cooperate to prepare the JAF 18 in good faith and otherwise will be subject to appropriate sanctions. 19 i. The parties shall work cooperatively to identify a single set of facts 20 alleged to be undisputed to avoid unnecessary duplication or 21 confusion. 22 ii. The parties shall provide only material facts, in a noncompound 23 form, arranged according to their relevancy to a particular issue. 24 Do not rotely cut and paste from the background of the joint brief. 25 iii. If a party disputes a fact in bad faith by offering evidence that does 26 not contradict the proffered fact or by failing to provide a specific 27 citation to the supporting evidence, the Court will deem the fact 28 6 1 undisputed for purposes of the motion. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 2 56(e)(2); L.R. 56-4. 3 iv. If a party disputes a fact in part, the disputing party should state 4 “Disputed in Part,” highlight the disputed part in bold italics, and 5 provide the specific evidentiary support for the dispute (see 6 example above). A party that lacks candor in failing to 7 acknowledge the limited extent of the dispute forces the Court to 8 expend needless resources discovering it itself. 9 v. The JAF should be as narrow and concise as the issues on 10 summary judgment properly warrant. If the Court determines that 11 the JAF is unjustifiably long or unwieldy, the Court may strike the 12 JAF and require the parties to refile it (and any document citing it) 13 within two business days. 14 vi. Deliberate gamesmanship designed to abuse the process will result 15 in an order to show cause (OSC) re sanctions against the abusive 16 party and/or counsel, including, if appropriate, terminating and/or 17 monetary sanctions. A party who is the subject of an OSC should 18 be prepared to justify each purportedly disputed fact at the hearing. 19 Abuses that will invite an OSC include but are not limited to the 20 following tactics: 21  Stating a fact is undisputed when it clearly is not; 22  Disputing a clearly undisputed fact in whole or part; 23  Manufacturing a dispute by mischaracterizing evidence, 24 reframing the stated fact in order to dispute the fact as 25 reframed, or using an evidentiary objection to dispute an 26 undisputed fact; 27  Making legal argument in the JAF; and 28 7 1  Introducing clearly irrelevant or immaterial facts for the 2 obvious purpose of obfuscation. 3 3. JOINT APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE (JAE) 4 The joint brief shall be accompanied by a JAE—i.e., a separate, tabbed 5 appendix of all evidence in support of or opposition to the MSJ, including 6 declarations, deposition excerpts, documents, photographs, etc. Physical evidence 7 (e.g., video recordings) shall be lodged separately. No evidence should be attached to 8 a memorandum of points and authorities or included anywhere other than in the JAE. 9 The JAE shall include a table of contents. The JAE shall be filed as a single, 10 combined PDF; more than one PDF may be filed if file-size constraints preclude filing 11 the JAE as a single PDF. In the event multiple PDFs are necessary to file the JAE, 12 each file shall be titled by part and exhibit series (e.g., JAE Part 1, Exhibits 1–50). 13 Each exhibit within the JAE must be bookmarked; the bookmark should include the 14 exhibit number and a brief description of the exhibit (e.g., Ex. 1 – Jones Depo. 15 Excerpts). 16 Declarations shall set out admissible facts without any argument, and evidence 17 must be properly authenticated by stipulation, declaration, or otherwise. No party 18 shall submit evidence other than the specific evidence necessary to support or 19 controvert a statement of fact. Do not, for example, submit the entire deposition 20 transcript or an entire set of interrogatory responses when relying on only a portion 21 thereof. 22 When multiple parties wish to produce different excerpts of the transcript of the 23 same deposition, the excerpts shall be combined into a single exhibit containing all 24 pages to which either party cites. 25 26 27 28 8 1 4. JOINT APPENDIX OF OBJECTIONS (JAO) 2 The parties shall prepare a Joint Appendix of Objections (JAO) containing any 3 evidentiary objections in a single, separate document presented in a three-column 4 table as follows: 5 Objector Evidence Objection (O)/Response (R) 6 Plaintiff 1. “Jane mailed the contract in O: Lacks foundation. 7 May 2017.” (Smith Decl. ¶ 8.) R: Smith saw Mary mail it. (¶ 8.) 8 9 Failure to comply with this formatting requirement will result in a waiver of the 10 objections. Blanket or boilerplate objections will be overruled and disregarded. 11 To allow both sides the opportunity to respond to the other’s evidentiary 12 objections, the JAO is due after the joint brief, JAF, and JAE, as follows: The party 13 opposing summary judgment shall provide the moving party with any objections to 14 the moving party’s evidence at the same time that it provides its portion of the joint 15 brief, the JAF, and the JAE. No later than seven days after receiving these materials, 16 the moving party shall provide to the opposing party its responses to the opposing 17 party’s evidentiary objections, together with any objections to the opposing party’s 18 evidence. Within seven days thereafter, the opposing party shall add its responses to 19 the moving party’s objections (without making any other changes) and file the JAO. 20 The parties’ objections and responses in the JAO shall be brief and strictly 21 limited to the admissibility of the evidence. No substantive legal arguments will be 22 permitted. If an evidentiary dispute is dispositive of a claim or argument, it should be 23 addressed in the briefing on that claim or argument. 24 5. FAILURE TO COMPLY 25 If it appears that the parties have not met and conferred in good faith, have not 26 worked to fully integrate the MSJ, or have otherwise failed to fully comply with this 27 order, the MSJ may be stricken, and the parties may be required to repeat the process. 28 The deadline for hearing the MSJ will not be continued for failure to comply with this 9 1 order, absent good cause. If it appears that one (or more) of the parties is primarily 2 responsible for the failure to properly file a compliant joint brief, the primarily 3 responsible party or parties shall be subject to appropriate sanctions. 4 5 6 Date: January 14, 2026 ___________________________ Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. 7 United States District Judge 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 10
Official source: https://apps.cacd.uscourts.gov/Jps/honorable-stanley-blumenfeld-jr · retrieved 2026-07-23