Definition
Conformity to fact; truthfulness; the quality of being true. In legal usage, verity most commonly appears in the phrase "import verity" or "import uncontrollable verity," a term of art applied to the records and judgments of courts of record. When a court record is said to import verity, it means the record is presumed to speak the truth of the proceedings it reflects and cannot be contradicted by extrinsic evidence except in narrowly prescribed circumstances.
---
Common Language
Modern common usage (Wiktionary): Primarily recognized today as a female given name derived from the Latin for truth; one of the Puritan virtue names.
Historical common usage (Webster's 1913): The quality or state of being true or real; conformity of a statement or proposition to fact; truth; reality. Also used to denote a true assertion or tenet — "a faithful verity."
The ordinary English sense and the legal sense share the same root meaning (truth, conformity to fact), but the legal term carries a specific procedural weight that the common word does not. In law, verity is not merely a description of accuracy — it is a presumption attached to official records that operates as a rule of evidence. Saying that a court record "imports verity" is a legal conclusion about the evidentiary standing of that record, not simply a compliment to its accuracy.
---
Why It Matters in Research
Researchers will encounter VERITY almost exclusively in one of two contexts: the general meaning of truthfulness or accuracy in older pleading and evidence materials, and the technical evidentiary doctrine that court records import uncontrollable verity.
The doctrine of records importing verity is foundational to understanding the force of judgments, particularly in historical common law practice. A judgment of a court of record was treated as conclusive proof of the facts it recited — it could not be impeached collaterally by showing the court got the facts wrong. This principle underlies much of the law on collateral attack of judgments, res judicata, and the distinction between courts of record and courts not of record.
The term itself largely fell out of active legal drafting in the twentieth century, replaced by plainer phrasing. Researchers working in pre-twentieth century case law, treatises, or pleadings will encounter it regularly; those working in modern materials will encounter it mainly as a historical reference or in secondary sources explaining the evidentiary weight of judgments.
Note that the Black's 1st edition entry contains an apparent transcription artifact — the definition trails into a definition of "vessel," which belongs to a separate entry and should be disregarded.
When tracing the doctrine of judicial records and their conclusive effect, this term connects directly to the broader body of law governing courts of record, collateral attack, and the distinction between void and voidable judgments. Anderson's cross-reference to RECORD (Judicial) is the correct research path from this term.
---
Historical Dictionary Support
Black's 1st and 2nd editions are in full agreement: verity means truth or truthfulness, and both anchor the term in the specific legal formula that court records "import uncontrollable verity," citing Black on Judgments. The phrase "uncontrollable verity" is the stronger form — it signals not merely that the record is presumed true but that the presumption resists contradiction.
Anderson's is characteristically terse, redirecting entirely to the entry for RECORD (Judicial), which accurately signals that the operative legal significance of the term lies in the doctrine of judicial records rather than in verity as an abstract concept.
What the historical dictionaries do not address is the evidentiary mechanism that makes the phrase practically meaningful — the distinction between direct and collateral attack, the role of courts of record versus inferior courts, and the limits on the doctrine when jurisdiction is challenged. Researchers should not treat the dictionary entries as a complete account of the doctrine; they are entry points only.
---
Jurisdictional Note
The principle that court records import verity is a general common law doctrine and appears across American and English jurisdictions, but its application — particularly regarding what may be shown to impeach a record and under what circumstances collateral attack is permitted — varies by jurisdiction and by the nature of the court involved. Federal and state courts may treat the doctrine differently with respect to foreign judgments and judgments of inferior courts.
---