Definition
"Sible for" does not exist as a recognized legal term. The phrase appears to be a corrupted or fragmentary rendering of "responsible for" — most likely a scanning or transcription artifact produced when the prefix "respon-" was separated from its root during optical character recognition or manual indexing of historical legal texts.
As a standalone entry, "sible for" carries no independent legal meaning and should not be treated as a term of art.
---
Common Confusion
Researchers encountering "sible for" in a legal index, concordance, or digitized historical dictionary should treat it as a truncated form of RESPONSIBLE FOR. The confusion arises almost exclusively in corpus research involving scanned 19th-century legal texts, where hyphenated line breaks, damaged page edges, or OCR misreads routinely strip prefixes from longer words. The stem "-sible" appears in several legal adjectives — responsible, admissible, permissible, ostensible — and the phrase "for" following any of these changes meaning substantially. Context is required to identify the intended term.
---
Why It Matters in Research
This entry is a research navigation warning. Law Mind corpus researchers should be aware of several failure modes that produce entries like "sible for" in historical legal dictionaries and indexes:
**OCR fragmentation.** When 19th-century texts are digitized, hyphenated words split across lines are frequent sources of garbled tokens. "Respon-/sible for" becomes "sible for" when the first line is dropped or misread.
**Index truncation.** Historical legal dictionaries — including Rapalje & Lawrence — sometimes indexed phrases under partial terms for typographical or space reasons. An entry appearing under "S" for "sible for" may have been intended as a cross-reference to a longer phrase filed elsewhere.
**The Rapalje & Lawrence context.** The surrounding entries in the source material (such terms as "resulting trust," "retrospective statute," "right heirs") are substantive legal phrases drawn from construction-of-instruments and probate contexts. "Sible for" does not fit this pattern and is best treated as a textual error rather than an omitted or obscure legal concept.
**Research recommendation.** If you have encountered "sible for" in a primary or secondary source, search instead for RESPONSIBLE FOR, LIABLE FOR, ANSWERABLE FOR, or — depending on the adjectival context — ADMISSIBLE, PERMISSIBLE, or OSTENSIBLE. If the source is a digitized 19th-century text, inspect the original page image rather than relying on the OCR transcript.
---
Historical Dictionary Support
Rapalje & Lawrence does not contain a coherent entry for "sible for." The phrase appears in the source index list alongside legitimate construction-of-instruments phrases (resulting trust, retrospective statute, right heirs, right of way), strongly suggesting it is a fragmentary artifact of the indexing or digitization process rather than an intentional entry. Historical legal dictionaries of this period — including Bouvier, Black's (1st and 2nd editions), and Rapalje & Lawrence — do not recognize "sible for" as a standalone legal phrase. None of the major shelf sources address it.
---
Encyclopedia Cross-Reference
If your research led you to this entry through a probate, estates, or trusts context — consistent with the surrounding Rapalje & Lawrence material — see: Intestate Rights of Parents, Siblings, and Collateral Relatives (Law Mind Trusts, Estates & Probate Encyclopedia).
---