SANS JOUR

Definition

Sans jour is a Law French phrase meaning "without day." It describes the adjournment or dismissal of a proceeding without any date being set for a future appearance or continuation. When a court adjourns sans jour, the matter is concluded — or at minimum suspended indefinitely — with no scheduled return. The phrase is functionally equivalent to the Latin sine die, which is more commonly encountered in modern legal sources.

Common Language

Modern common usage (Wiktionary): No established common English entry. The phrase is not in general popular use. Historical common usage (Webster's 1913): Not listed. "Sans" appears as an archaic or literary preposition meaning "without," borrowed directly from French, as in Shakespeare's "sans teeth, sans eyes, sans taste, sans everything." The word "sans" has survived in literary and informal English as an affectation meaning "without," but sans jour as a compound has no common-language life outside legal and parliamentary contexts. Researchers encountering the phrase in old reports or records should not rely on the intuitive English meaning of "sans" alone — the full phrase carries specific procedural weight.

Common Confusion

Sans jour and sine die are used interchangeably and mean the same thing. The only practical difference is linguistic: sans jour is Law French; sine die is Latin. Both appear in English legal materials, but sine die has largely displaced sans jour in modern usage. Researchers may encounter either in historical sources depending on the period and jurisdiction. Older English Year Books and common law reporters favored Law French forms; later materials, particularly from the eighteenth century onward, shifted toward Latin or plain English equivalents. Neither term implies permanent termination of the underlying matter as a matter of course — the procedural consequence depends on context.

Why It Matters in Research

The primary research value of this entry is identification. Sans jour appears in older English legal reports, Year Books, and early American materials where Law French remained in use. A researcher unfamiliar with the phrase may misread or misclassify a proceeding's outcome, failing to recognize that the entry signals an open-ended adjournment rather than a judgment on the merits. The displacement of sans jour by sine die happened gradually. In corpus sources, the shift tracks roughly with the decline of Law French in English courts — accelerated by the Proceedings in Courts of Justice Act 1731, which required proceedings in England to be conducted in English. After that period, sine die and plain-English "without day" largely took over, and sans jour becomes a marker of pre-1731 or early colonial-era materials. Researchers working in parliamentary records should note that both sans jour and sine die appear in adjournment contexts for legislative bodies as well as courts. The phrase signals the close of a session without fixing a return date, which carries constitutional and political significance in some parliamentary systems. Do not assume that every sans jour adjournment is a final disposition. In some historical contexts, it functioned more like a modern continuance with no set date, leaving the matter theoretically open. The practical effect — whether revival was possible — depended on the nature of the proceeding.

Historical Dictionary Support

Black's Law Dictionary (both editions) gives a clean, consistent definition: "Without day; sine die." No elaboration is offered beyond the cross-reference to the Latin equivalent. This brevity is typical of the treatment given to Law French terms that had already become archaic by the time the dictionary was compiled. Bouvier's entry under this term is not usefully preserved in the available source material — the text provided under Bouvier corresponds to unrelated entries (ADFINES, ADHERING), suggesting a digitization or indexing artifact. Researchers consulting Bouvier directly should locate the term under the "S" listings; it is reasonable to expect treatment consistent with Black's given the term's settled meaning. No meaningful divergence exists among the historical dictionaries on this point. The term was never contested or ambiguous — it is a fixed translation of a procedural concept.

Related Terms