SAINTS

5 definitions found across Law Mind sources

SAINTSAuthored
The Law Mind • 634 words
Definition
In historical English legal usage, *saints* (from the Law French *saintz*, *seintz*, or *seyntz*) refers to the saints of the Christian church as objects of invocation in oath-taking. The term appears in old English statutes and legal treatises in contexts suggesting that swearing by the saints — or by God and the saints together — was at some points practiced in England. Burrill notes, however, that judicial oaths appear to have been uniformly administered on the gospels rather than by direct invocation of saints, and that the broader swearing practice was likely confined to non-judicial or informal occasions. The term has no independent substantive legal meaning in modern law. Its significance is archival: it appears as a linguistic marker in early English legal sources and illuminates the religious forms that surrounded oath-taking in medieval and early modern legal practice.
Common Language
Modern common usage (Wiktionary): Plural of *saint* — persons recognized as holy, typically within a Christian religious tradition, often formally canonized by a church. Historical common usage (Webster's 1913): Holy persons; those eminent for piety; in ecclesiastical usage, those canonized or officially recognized by the church as having attained heaven. The gap between common and legal meaning here is one of context rather than substance. In ordinary usage, *saints* refers to the persons themselves as objects of veneration. In old legal sources, the word functions as a term of art within oath formulas — it marks a specific invocatory practice with procedural implications for the validity or form of an oath. A reader encountering *saintz* in a medieval statute is not reading devotional language; they are reading a record of legal ceremony.
Why It Matters in Research
Researchers encountering *saintz*, *seintz*, or *seyntz* in transcribed statutes, year books, or early legal treatises should treat the term as a flag for oath-related provisions or procedural context, not as incidental religious language. The spelling variations are characteristic of Law French orthographic instability and may index the same passage differently across different manuscript traditions or printed editions. The practical historical question — whether English judicial oaths were sworn by the saints or on the gospels — matters for interpreting the legal effect of oaths recorded in early proceedings. Burrill's caution that judicial oaths were uniformly made on the gospels, while swearing by the saints may have occurred on other occasions, suggests a distinction between formal judicial procedure and informal or extrajudicial practice. Researchers should not assume that statutory language referencing saints reflects actual courtroom procedure without corroborating sources. The reference Burrill supplies — Barrington's *Observations on the More Ancient Statutes* — is the primary secondary source on this question in the historical English legal literature and should be the first stop for corpus researchers working on oath forms in early English law.
Historical Dictionary Support
Burrill's Law Dictionary is the only major historical legal dictionary to treat this term as a discrete entry, and its treatment is notably cautious. Burrill acknowledges the inference drawn from Law French statutory language — that swearing by the saints was once common — but immediately qualifies it: judicial oaths, he concludes, were made on the gospels. This measured position is consistent with what legal historians have found: invocation of saints in formal court proceedings was displaced relatively early by gospel-based oath administration, even as saints' names continued to appear in statutory and devotional formulas. No entry appears in Black's Law Dictionary, Bouvier's Law Dictionary, or other standard American legal dictionaries, reflecting that the term carried no operative legal meaning in American practice and was essentially obsolete as a legal term by the time American legal lexicography developed.
Related Terms
Oath; Affirmation; Gospel (as oath-support); Perjury; Law French; Judicial Oath; Swearing; Imprecation
SAINTSmain
Burrill's Law Dictionary • 1870
[L. Fr. saintz, seintz, seyntz.] From the L. Fr. seintz, or seyntz, used in old statutes and treatises, it has been supposed that it was formerly common in England to swear by the saints, or by God and the saints. See Barringt. Obs. Stat. 177, and notes. This was doubtless the practice on some occasions; but judicial oaths seem to have been uniformly made by, or rather on the gospels. The expressions in Britton,-si luy eyde Dieu et les saintz, (so help him God and the saints,) si lour eyde Dieu et ses seyntz, (so help them God and his saints,) and other passages, (see Britt. cc. 2, 22, 52, 68,) may be explained by the use of the corresponding Latin word sancta, in the parallel passages in Bracton and Fleta. Sicut me Deus adjuvet et hæc sancta. Fleta, lib. 1, с. 18, § 4. Sicipsum Deus adjuvet et hæc sancta. Id. lib. 2, c. 63, § 12. And see Id. lib. 4, c. 9, § 1. That sancta, in these passages, cannot be translated saints, is obvious, not only from the neuter form of the word, but from the invariable use of the pronoun hæc, (these,) in connection with it, indicating that the things sworn by were actually present before the party who made the oath. That evangelia (gospels) was the word to be understood and supplied, appears from passages in which it is actually expressed. See Fleta, lib. 2, c. 12, § 17. The following passage from Bracton is conclusive on this point: After giving the words of the oath taken by the first juror sworn, Hoc auditis justitiarii, quod ego veritatem dicam, &c. sic me Deus adjuvet et hæc sancta Dei evangelia, (Hear this ye justices, that I will speak the truth, &c. so help me God, and these holy gospels of God,) he adds, Et post eum jurabit quilibet aliorum separatim, et per se; Tale sacramentum quale A. primus jurator, s. hic, juravit, ego tenebo ex parte mea, sic me Deus adjuvet et hæc sancta; (and after him shall each of the others separately and by himself swear, such an oath as A. this first juror has sworn, will I keep on my part, so help me God and these holy [gospels.] Bract. fol. 116.
saintsnoun
Wiktionary (English) • 2026
Wiktionary contributorsCC BY-SA 4.0 • via Kaikki
Extracted and formatted for display by Law Mind. Source link opens the current Wiktionary page and its contributor history; it is not a frozen copy of this extract.
plural of saint
Saintsname
Wiktionary (English) • 2026
Wiktionary contributorsCC BY-SA 4.0 • via Kaikki
Extracted and formatted for display by Law Mind. Source link opens the current Wiktionary page and its contributor history; it is not a frozen copy of this extract.
plural of Saint
saintsverb
Wiktionary (English) • 2026
Wiktionary contributorsCC BY-SA 4.0 • via Kaikki
Extracted and formatted for display by Law Mind. Source link opens the current Wiktionary page and its contributor history; it is not a frozen copy of this extract.
third-person singular simple present indicative of saint

Explore the full Law Mind legal research platform.

SubscribeEncyclopediaSign In