Definition
An old English law term with two distinct but related meanings in historical sources:
1. A remainder — that is, a future interest in real property that takes effect upon the natural expiration of a prior estate, typically a life estate or fee tail, granted in the same instrument.
2. A perpetuity, or perpetual estate (rendered in Latin texts as *pro perpetuo*) — a form of landholding conceived as enduring indefinitely, without the limitations associated with a particular estate.
The term is Latin in form, derived from *remanere* (to remain or stay behind), and appears almost exclusively in medieval English legal writing and commentary on the common law of real property. It has no practical currency in modern law and is encountered only in historical sources and scholarship on ancient land tenures.
---
Why It Matters in Research
Researchers working in pre-modern English land law will encounter *remanentia* in sources spanning Glanvill, Bracton, and the Regiam Majestatem — the foundational texts of the Anglo-Norman and early common law tradition. Several navigational points deserve attention:
**The two meanings create interpretive risk.** The same word, in the same body of sources, can denote either a remainder (a future interest that vests upon expiration of a prior estate) or a perpetual estate (an estate with no anticipated termination). These are not minor variations — they describe structurally different property interests. Context within the source, and cross-reference to surrounding text, is essential to determining which meaning applies.
**The remainder sense is the more frequently cited.** Both Black's editions give primacy to the remainder meaning, citing Spelman's *Glossarium Archaiologicum*. The perpetuity meaning, though present in all three source dictionaries, derives from Glanvill (lib. 7, c. 1), Bracton (fol. 244), and the Regiam Majestatem (lib. 2, c. 23) — texts of Scottish and English feudal law respectively. Researchers tracing the perpetuity usage should work from those primary sources rather than relying on the dictionary gloss alone.
**Scottish law connection.** The citation to the Regiam Majestatem is significant. That text — a foundational source of early Scots law — adapted Norman and English feudal doctrine for the Scottish context. References to *remanentia* in Scottish legal history may carry somewhat different weight than identical passages in purely English sources. Researchers working across Anglo-Scottish legal history should flag this.
**Do not conflate with modern "remainder."** The modern remainder doctrine as codified or interpreted under the Rule Against Perpetuities, future interests statutes, or the Uniform Trust Code has a precise technical meaning and a substantial body of case law. *Remanentia* as a remainder belongs to a different conceptual world — pre-Statute of Uses, pre-modern tenure reform — and importing modern doctrine backward onto the term distorts historical analysis.
**Corpus connections.** This term belongs to a cluster of Latin property law vocabulary that researchers will find scattered through glossaries, treatise commentaries, and Year Book marginalia. Related terms worth tracking in parallel include *haereditas* (inheritance), *feoffment*, *fee tail*, and the broader vocabulary of *seisin*. Burrill's more detailed entry is the most useful starting point for source-tracing, as it provides the widest range of primary citations.
---
Historical Dictionary Support
The three source dictionaries present substantially identical definitions, suggesting a settled, if narrow, consensus on meaning. All three cite Spelman for the remainder sense. Burrill adds Bracton and the Regiam Majestatem to the Glanvill citation shared by the Black's editions, making his entry the richest for source-tracing purposes.
No source dictionary provides significant elaboration. The brevity of all three entries reflects the word's status: obsolete in practice, preserved primarily as a glossary item. The Black's editions add nothing to the Burrill coverage; indeed, Burrill's entry appears to be the more scholarly predecessor from which the Black's treatment was condensed.
None of the source dictionaries distinguish clearly between the two meanings or explain how to resolve ambiguity when the term appears without obvious context. That analytical gap falls to the researcher.
One minor textual curiosity: Burrill's entry contains a fragment that appears to be a misplaced passage from another entry ("Remedial statutes are those which are made to supply such defects..."), suggesting a typesetting error in the source edition. This fragment should be disregarded as belonging to *remanentia*.
---
Jurisdictional Note
The term originates in English common law and appears in early Scottish legal texts. It has no recognized meaning in American law and is not used in any contemporary jurisdiction. Research use is confined to historical and comparative legal analysis of English and Scottish feudal land tenure.
---