powers. It serves as a guide to the intentions of the framers, which is only the first stage on the road to construction. Not being an essential part of a statute, it is frequently omitted.¹ 3. A recital in a contract declaring the intention of the parties. See CONTRACT. The limits of an officer's jurisdiction, or of an election district. As used in the return to a process, the territory within which the officer may legally discharge the duties of his office.5 A general word, indicating any district marked out and defined. In a given connection, may signify a district inferior to a county and superior to a township.6 In Wisconsin, formerly referred to certain districts having similar functions to those of towns, and which passed away upon the formation of the first legislative 1 Copeland v. Memphis, &c. R. Co., 3 Woods, 660 (1878), Woods, J.; Beard v. Rowan, 9 Pet. *317 (1835); Commonwealth v. Smith, 76 Va. 484-85 (1882), cases; 18 Cent. Law J. 27-29 (1884), cases - Irish Law Times; 15 Johns. 116; 1 Pick. 251; 69 Pa. 332; Dwar. Stat. 107. 2 Randolph v. Milman, L. R., 4 C. P. *111 (1868). * Shields v. Shields, 60 Barb. 61 (1870), Potter, J. 1 Colton v. Colton, 127 U. S. 312-21 (1888), cases, See Story, Bailm. §§ 227, 253 b; Hadley, Rom. Law, Matthews, J. See generally 20 Cent. Law J. 63-66 178. 5 L. precari, to pray, entreat, request. 2 Story, Eq. §§ 1086-70. Warner v. Bates, 98 Mass. 276-78 (1867), cases, Bigelow, C. J.; Handley v. Wrightson, 60 Md. 198-206 (1883), cases; Knox v. Knox, 59 Wis. 172, 178-85 (1884), cases; Howard v. Carusi, 109 U. S. 725 (1884); 44 Am. Dec. 365, 369; Hawk. Wills, 159 (1885), cases. (1885), cases; 27 Am. Law Reg. 459-63 (1888), cases; 1 Perry, Trusts, §§ 112-23, cases. 21. Pre-cēd'-ent. 2. Prěc'-e-dent. 3 On the value of, see 10 Va. Law J. 582 (1886). • Adams v. Vose, 1 Gray, 58 (1854), Dewey, J. Brooks v. Norris, 124 Mass. 173 (1878), Colt, J. Union Pacific R. Co. v. Cheyenne, 113 U. S. 524 (1885), Bradley, J.