See OPERA. 11 F. R. 201, ante, Dr. Wharton. 2 See 2 Bl. Com. 140 (a): Coke, Litt. § 57. 3 United States v. Fisk, 3 Wall. 447 (1865); Dumont v. United States, 98 U. S. 143 (1878); 14 Ct. Cl. 300; 41 Iowa, 593; 20 Pick. 378, 477; 105 Mass. 185; 50 Mich. 531; 64 N. С. 493, 563; 74 id. 402; 24 N. J. L. 686; 24 N. Y. 463; 40 id. 97; 82 Pa. 326; 83 id. 223; 20 Tex. 438; 24 Wis. 394; 1 Williams, Ex. 932; 9 East, 366; 16 id. 67; 31 L. J. Ex. 38. State v. Walters, 97 N. C. 490 (1887), cases. * Commonwealth v. Grey, 2 Gray, 502 (1854), cases; 7 Gratt. 592. State v. Hester, 48 Ark. 40 (1886); Mans. Dig. § 1835. 'Ballentine v. State, 48 Ark. 48 (1886). • Schreiber v. Butler, 84 Ind. 583 (1882). • L. orator: orare, to petition. In statutes against forgery, a written direction addressed by one who either has in fact, or in writing professes to have, control over a fund or thing, to another who either purports in the writing to be under obligation to obey, or who is in fact under such obligation, commanding him how to appropriate the fund or thing. There are two kinds of orders: such 11 Wheat. 324; 4 id. 402. 2 Kibbe v. Antram, 4 Conn. 139 (1821); Baker v. Fales, 16 Mass. 512 (1820). 34 Dl. Com. 342; 110 U. S. 529-30; 2 Am. Jur. 280 (1829); 1 Steph. Hist. Cr. L. Eng. 250. 4 See Hinnemann v. Rosenback, 39 N. Y. 100 (1868). Treat v. Stanton, 14 Conn. 456 (1841). • Mechanics' Bank v. Straiton, 3 Keyes, 366 (N. Y., 1867). * Osgood v. Artt, 17 F. R. 575 (1883); Cassidy v. First Nat. Bank, 30 Minn. 86 (1882). (47)