Definition
A launcegay is a type of offensive weapon, now entirely disused, that was prohibited in England by statute. The term refers to a lance-like weapon — a shorter, lighter throwing spear or javelin — that was regulated as a dangerous arm during the medieval period. It has no living legal significance and appears in legal sources solely as a historical artifact of early English statutory regulation of weapons.
---
Why It Matters in Research
The launcegay is a terminal-point term for most research paths: it will not appear in modern statutes, regulations, or case law. Its value is archival and contextual.
Researchers encountering this term will most likely find it in one of two settings: (1) transcriptions or analyses of medieval English statutes, particularly the period of Richard II's reign, where Parliamentary efforts to restrict the carrying of arms by commoners and non-nobles were active; or (2) secondary legal dictionaries from the 19th century that preserved the term as part of exhaustive historical coverage.
The statutory reference — 7 Rich. II c. 13 — is the critical anchor. Researchers working in early English statutory law should treat this citation as the primary source. The Statutes of the Realm and Rolls of Parliament are the appropriate corpus locations for the underlying text. Researchers should note that the truncated citation appearing in some dictionary editions ("7 Rich." without the chapter reference fully rendered) reflects typographic attrition across reprints — a common problem in older law dictionary editions and one worth flagging when tracing citations back to source.
The launcegay belongs to a cluster of medieval weapon terms — alongside terms like gisarme, halberd, and crossbow — that appear in English statutory and common law history when Parliament sought to regulate arms bearing by particular classes of persons. Researchers studying the historical development of weapons law, the right to bear arms, or the regulation of the commons in medieval England may find this cluster of terms useful for building a fuller picture of that regulatory environment.
---
Historical Dictionary Support
All three source dictionaries — Black's (1st and 2nd editions) and Rapalje & Lawrence — are in near-complete agreement, offering virtually identical definitions: a kind of offensive weapon, now disused, prohibited by 7 Rich. II c. 13. The uniformity is unsurprising, as Rapalje & Lawrence and the early Black's editions drew from overlapping common sources in English legal lexicography, including earlier glossaries and abridgments.
None of the three sources elaborates on the physical character of the weapon, its historical use, or the social context of the prohibition. The entries are definitionally minimal — typical for weapons terms that had fallen entirely out of legal practice by the time these dictionaries were compiled. A researcher wanting more than bare identification will need to go beyond the legal dictionaries to antiquarian and military history sources. Jacob's Law Dictionary and Cowell's Interpreter, predecessors to the Black's tradition, similarly treat such terms with brevity.
The 2nd edition of Black's appears to contain a typographic corruption in the entry ("wea)-on"), indicating a print-era scanning or transcription error. This is worth noting for researchers relying on digitized versions, as such artifacts can complicate automated text searching across the corpus.
---
Jurisdictional Note
The launcegay is exclusively an English legal term rooted in medieval Parliamentary statute. It has no American legal history. Researchers in U.S. legal sources will not encounter it except in comparative or historical discussions of English weapons law.
---