Definition
In law, intersection refers to the point at which two roads, streets, or other thoroughfares meet or cross. The legal definition is more precise than the common geographic sense: the intersection of two roads is determined by the point where their middle lines cross, not by the outer boundaries of the pavement, curb lines, or any other physical feature.
This definition carries practical consequence in traffic law, property boundary disputes, road dedication proceedings, and liability cases involving motor vehicle accidents. Whether a collision occurred "at" or "within" an intersection—rather than before or after it—can determine which traffic rules applied, who had the right of way, and how comparative fault is allocated.
In modern traffic codes, intersection is typically defined by statute and may encompass the entire area within the prolongation of the lateral curb lines (or, where there are no curbs, the lateral boundary lines of roadways) of two or more highways joining at grade. This statutory framing is broader than the historical middle-lines rule and is important to keep distinct.
---
Common Language
Modern common usage (Wiktionary): The junction of two or more paths, streets, highways, or other thoroughfares; more broadly, any overlap, confluence, or crossover; in mathematics, the set of elements common to two or more sets.
Historical common usage (Webster's 1913): The act, state, or place of intersecting; the point or line in which one line or surface cuts another.
The common understanding of intersection loosely corresponds to the legal one when applied to roads, but the legal definition historically fixes the intersection at a precise geometric point—the crossing of center lines—rather than treating it as a zone or area. Modern traffic statutes have largely replaced the center-line rule with an area-based definition, meaning the legal meaning has shifted over time and may diverge from both the historical legal rule and the lay understanding depending on jurisdiction and era.
---
Why It Matters in Research
The gap between the historical center-line definition and modern area-based statutory definitions is a recurring trap for researchers working across time periods. Sources from the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries—including all three historical dictionaries in this corpus—define intersection as a geometric point (middle lines crossing). Contemporary traffic codes in most U.S. jurisdictions define it as an area bounded by the prolongation of curb or boundary lines. A case decided under the former rule may not apply cleanly to a modern fact pattern, and vice versa.
Researchers working on historical road dedication cases, easement disputes, or early automobile accident litigation should apply the center-line rule as the operative baseline unless a controlling statute defined it otherwise at the time.
In corpus searches, note that "intersection" appears across multiple doctrinal contexts in Law Mind materials that are not road-related—domestic violence law, criminal forfeiture, employment discrimination—where the term is used in its general sense of doctrinal overlap between two legal regimes. These uses are analytically distinct from the road-law definition and should not be conflated.
When researching traffic liability, pay attention to whether the applicable statute defines intersection by reference to center lines, curb-line prolongations, or some other measure. The legal consequences—right-of-way rules, signal-compliance obligations, duty-of-care standards—often depend on whether a vehicle was "in" the intersection as defined by that statute at the relevant moment.
The Pennsylvania cases cited across all three historical dictionaries (73 Pa. 127; 74 Pa. 259) are the common anchor for the center-line rule in historical sources. Researchers should verify whether later Pennsylvania decisions or statutes modified that standard before treating those cases as current authority.
---
Historical Dictionary Support
All three historical sources—Black's (1st Ed.), Black's (2nd Ed.), and Bouvier's—are in complete agreement, presenting virtually identical language: the intersection of two roads is where their middle lines intersect, anchored to the same Pennsylvania authority. This uniformity reflects a settled common-law understanding rather than any doctrinal controversy. There is no meaningful divergence among the sources to report.
What the historical dictionaries do not address is equally important: they offer no guidance on the area-based conception that would come to dominate twentieth-century traffic codes, and they make no reference to intersections formed by more than two roads, to grade separations, or to driveways and private ways entering a public road—all of which receive attention in modern statutory definitions. Researchers should treat the historical entries as capturing a narrow, geometrically precise rule that has since been largely superseded in traffic-law contexts.
---
Jurisdictional Note
Modern intersection definitions vary by state statute and local ordinance. Most U.S. jurisdictions follow the Uniform Vehicle Code's area-based model, which measures intersection from the prolongation of lateral boundary or curb lines. Some states add specific provisions for T-intersections, multi-leg intersections, and private driveways. Canadian provinces and Commonwealth jurisdictions may use different framing entirely. Always locate the controlling statutory definition before applying any general rule.
---
Encyclopedia Cross-Reference
The term intersection appears in Law Mind Encyclopedia entries in its non-road sense of doctrinal overlap:
- Domestic Violence -- Intersection with Custody and Visitation (The Law Mind Family Law Encyclopedia)
- Civil Forfeiture and Its Intersection with Criminal Law (The Law Mind Criminal Law Encyclopedia)
- Title VII and Constitutional Intersections -- Employment Discrimination and Equal Protection (The Law Mind Constitutional Law Encyclopedia)
None of these entries addresses intersection as a traffic or property concept. No Law Mind Encyclopedia entry covers road intersection doctrine as a standalone topic.
---