Definition
"HZRES" does not appear to be a recognized legal term. The source material provided contains a fragment — "of heirs, come the heirs of heirs to infinity. Co. Litt. 9." — which is a partial quotation associated with the doctrine of heirs in property law, most likely excerpted from an entry on a Latin or Law French term such as HAERES (heir). The string "HZRES" appears to be a corrupted, truncated, or encoding-error form of that term and has no independent legal meaning or dictionary standing.
Researchers encountering "HZRES" in a digitized legal corpus should treat it as an OCR artifact or transcription error. The underlying concept — heirs extending in perpetual succession ("heirs of heirs to infinity") — belongs to the entry for HAERES or HEIR.
---
Common Confusion
Do not confuse this string with any of the following legitimate terms: HAERES (Latin: heir; the person entitled to inherit); HERES (variant spelling in some civil law sources); or HEIR (the common law English equivalent). Each of these has substantive dictionary support. "HZRES" has none.
---
Why It Matters in Research
This entry exists as a navigational warning. Optical character recognition (OCR) errors are endemic in digitized historical legal texts, and Law Mind corpus researchers will occasionally encounter garbled headwords that do not resolve to any known legal term. "HZRES" is a representative example: the character sequence is consistent with a failed OCR scan of "HAERES" (the Latin for heir), where the letters A, E, and parts of surrounding characters collapsed into unreadable substitutes.
When a search returns this string, do not treat it as a discrete legal concept. Instead: (1) identify the surrounding context in the source document; (2) look for Latin or Law French terms in the same semantic neighborhood (heir, inheritance, descent, succession); and (3) redirect research to HAERES or HEIR, both of which carry the substantive doctrine the source fragment describes.
The quotation fragment preserved here — "heirs of heirs to infinity" with a citation to Co. Litt. 9 — refers to Sir Edward Coke's commentary on Littleton's Tenures, a foundational text of English property law. Coke on Littleton was a primary authority on the meaning of "heirs" in fee simple conveyances and the rule that the word "heirs" was essential to create a freehold of inheritance at common law. That doctrine is real and well-documented; the headword "HZRES" is not.
---
Historical Dictionary Support
Black's Law Dictionary (2nd Ed.) contains no legitimate entry under "HZRES." The fragment attributed to this headword — drawn from Co. Litt. 9 — is consistent with Black's treatment of HAERES or related heir-and-succession entries, where Coke's commentary on Littleton was frequently cited as foundational authority. The corruption of the headword renders the source material unreliable as a standalone entry. Researchers should consult the HAERES and HEIR entries in Black's directly, where the substance of this doctrine is properly presented.
---