Definition
An archaic legal term appearing in old English records meaning grass or herbage — that is, the vegetation growing on land, particularly as an object of property rights or conveyance. The term appears most commonly in medieval and early modern English land records in the context of rights to cut, graze, or otherwise use the grass and ground-level vegetation on a parcel of land.
---
Common Language
Modern common usage (Wiktionary): No entry. The term has no current common usage in English.
Historical common usage (Webster's 1913): No entry. The term was already archaic or specialized by the nineteenth century.
Editorial note: FESA is pure legal and archaic record vocabulary. It has no meaningful life in ordinary English and requires no common-language bridge. Researchers encountering it do so exclusively in historical legal documents.
---
Why It Matters in Research
Researchers working with medieval English land records, monastic surveys, manorial rolls, and conveyancing documents may encounter FESA in contexts that are easy to misread. The principal traps are these:
First, FESA is a subject-matter term, not a rights term. It describes what is being dealt with — the grass or herbage — not the legal right to use it. The right to cut or graze that grass would be described separately, typically as a profit à prendre or under terms like estovers or herbage rights. Confusing the subject matter with the right is a common source of misreading.
Second, the term clusters with related agrarian vocabulary — vestura terrae (the vesture or crop of the land), herbage, and turbary (the right to cut peat or turf) — and researchers should not assume that any single term encompasses the full bundle of rights a document may be addressing. A grant of fesa did not necessarily convey the soil, the timber, or subsurface rights.
Third, Black's citation to 2 Mon. Angl. 906 (Monasticon Anglicanum, the great survey of English monastic foundations compiled by Dugdale) locates FESA squarely in ecclesiastical and monastic land documentation. Researchers using Law Mind corpus materials on monastic property, dissolution records, or English church lands from the medieval and early modern periods are most likely to encounter it.
Fourth, the term appears to have been already rare by the time Cowell compiled his legal glossary (The Interpreter, 1607), and both Bouvier and Black rely on Cowell as their source. This means the term's documentary life is primarily pre-seventeenth century.
---
Historical Dictionary Support
Both Bouvier and Black give the same minimal definition — grass; herbage — and both trace the term to Cowell. Black adds a citation to Dugdale's Monasticon Anglicanum, which grounds the term's usage in English monastic land records. Neither dictionary elaborates on the legal context, the type of documents in which the term appeared, or how it related to adjacent land-law vocabulary. Their treatment is purely glossarial.
No meaningful divergence exists between the two sources; Black is essentially reproducing Bouvier's entry with a documentary citation added. Neither source offers enough to reconstruct the full operational context of the term. Researchers needing that context should look to Coke's commentary on agrarian rights, Dugdale's Monasticon directly, or secondary scholarship on English manorial and monastic land tenure.
---
Jurisdictional Note
FESA as a legal term is specific to English law and English record-keeping tradition. It does not appear as a term of art in Scots law, civil law systems, or American legal usage. Researchers working in non-English jurisdictions will not encounter it.
---