A compilation arranged in an orderly manner. The name is given to a great variety of topical compilations, abridgments, and analytical indices of reports, statutes, etc. When reference is made to the Digest, the Pandects of Justinian are intended, they being the authoritative compilation of the civil law. As to this Digest and the mode of citing it, Bee PANDECTS. Other digests are referred to by their distinctive names. For some account of digests of the civil and canon law, and those of Indian law, Bee CIVIL LAW, CODE, and CANON LAW. The digests of English and American law are for the most part deemed not authorities, but simply manuals of reference, by which the reader may find his way to the original cases which are authorities. 1 Burr. 864; 2 Wils. 1, 2. Some of them, however, which have been the careful work of scholarly law- yers, possess an independent value as original re positories of the law. Bacon's Abridgment, which has long been deservedly popular in this country, and Comyns's Digest, also often cited, are examples of these. The earlier English digests are those of Statham (Hen. VL), Fitzherbert, 1516, Brooke, 1578, Rolle, Danvers, Nelson, Viner, and Petersdorf. Of these Rolle and Viner are still not unfrequently cited, and some others rarely. The several digests by Coventry & Hughes, Harrison, Fisher, Jacobs, and Chitty, together with the subsequent annual digests of Emden and of Mews, afford a convenient index for the American reader to the English reports. In most of the United States one or more digests of the state reports have been published, and in some of them digests or topical arrangements of the statutes. There are also digests of the federal reports, the federal statutes, and one known as the United States Digest, with the annual volumes from 1878 to 1889 and the American Digest and the General Digest subsequent to that date, which cover the re- ports of the federal and state courts together. Dane's Abridgment of American Law has been com- mended by high authority (Story's article in N. Am. Rev. July, 1826), but it has not maintained a position as a work of general use. There are also numerous digests of cases on particular titles of the law. DIGEST, THE. See FIFTY DECISIONS,