Definition
In old English law, approvers were bailiffs or stewards appointed to manage the affairs of a lord within his franchise or manor, particularly responsible for improving and accounting for the profits of the lord's lands and revenues. The term carried a specific administrative and fiscal character: approvers were charged with "approving" — that is, augmenting or making profitable — the lord's estate, often by enclosing waste lands or otherwise increasing the yield of manorial holdings.
A second, related usage applied the term to the king's own officials. Sheriffs acting in their revenue-collecting capacity were sometimes described as the king's approvers, reflecting the same root sense of agents accountable for making the crown's revenues productive.
A third, historically significant usage — largely distinct from the manorial context — applied the term to criminal informers or accomplices who, having been charged with a felony, turned crown's evidence against their confederates in exchange for a pardon. This prosecutorial use of the term was common in medieval English criminal practice and represents an entirely separate legal concept that shares the same label.
---
Common Confusion
The term approvers carries at least two distinct legal meanings that are easily conflated: (1) the manorial/fiscal agent sense (bailiff improving a lord's estate), and (2) the criminal law sense (an accused felon who impeaches accomplices to obtain a pardon). Historical sources do not always clearly distinguish which sense is operative, and some older dictionaries collapse the two or treat the criminal sense as primary. Researchers encountering the term in medieval records should determine from context whether the document concerns estate management or criminal proceedings before drawing conclusions.
The criminal sense of approver — a co-conspirator who turns informer — is also conceptually related to but distinct from the modern figure of a cooperating witness or an informant under a plea agreement. The medieval approver was a recognized procedural actor with specific legal standing; the analogy to modern practice is approximate at best.
---
Why It Matters in Research
This is a term of almost exclusively historical significance. Researchers are unlikely to encounter approvers in modern primary sources, but the term surfaces regularly in medieval English legal records, Year Books, manor court rolls, and treatises on English land law.
The primary research trap is ambiguity between the two major usages. A document concerning manorial administration and one concerning a felony prosecution might both use the word approvers without any signal that different legal concepts are at work. Context — the nature of the proceeding, the court involved, and the subject matter — must guide interpretation.
The fiscal/manorial sense connects directly to the Statute of Merton (1236) and the Statute of Westminster II (1285), which regulated lords' rights to enclose and improve waste lands, a power frequently exercised through approvers. Researchers working on enclosure history, common rights, or the development of English property law will encounter the term in this context.
The criminal sense connects to the broader medieval practice of approvement in felony cases, which was a distinct procedural mechanism — not merely an evidentiary choice but a formal legal gambit with its own rules, risks, and consequences for the approver if the impeachment failed. That broader procedural framework is captured under the related noun approvement rather than approvers.
Jurisdictional reach of this term is effectively confined to English legal history. It does not carry over in any meaningful way into American common law or modern Anglo-American legal usage.
---
Historical Dictionary Support
Black's Law Dictionary confirms both the manorial agent sense (bailiffs of lords in their franchises) and the crown officer sense (sheriffs as the king's approvers), citing a statutory source in 1 Edward. The entry is notably spare and does not address the criminal informer meaning, which other historical treatises — including Blackstone's Commentaries — treat as a separate though cognate usage. The incompleteness of Black's entry here is worth flagging: relying on it alone would leave a researcher unaware of the criminal law dimension entirely.
Older English legal dictionaries, including Cowell's Interpreter and Jacob's Law Dictionary, give fuller treatment to the approver as criminal informer, tracing the concept to early common law and describing the procedural consequences when an approver's accusation failed — typically, the approver would be hanged. The divergence between Black's and these English sources reflects the different audiences and traditions each was addressing; Black's treatment is oriented toward American practitioners, for whom the medieval criminal usage was a dead letter.
---
Jurisdictional Note
The term approvers is specific to English legal history and has no operative meaning in any modern common law jurisdiction. It does not appear in American statutory or case law as a term of art. Researchers working in Scottish, Irish, or Welsh historical records should treat the term with additional caution, as franchise and manorial structures differed across the British Isles.
---