Definition
An officer of the English Court of Exchequer whose function was to examine sheriffs concerning their financial accounts. The apposer reviewed the sheriff's estreats — the extracted records of fines, amercements, and other sums owed to the Crown — against the official record, and interrogated the sheriff as to each particular item. The officer was commonly styled the "foreign apposer," distinguishing this role from related exchequer functions. The office was historical and specific to the English fiscal administration; it has no modern counterpart.
---
Common Language
Modern common usage (Wiktionary): An asker; someone who poses questions.
Historical common usage (Webster's 1913): An examiner; one whose business is to put questions. Formerly, in the English Court of Exchequer, an officer who audited the sheriffs' accounts.
By 1913, Webster's had already begun treating the legal office as the secondary, historical sense of a word meaning simply "one who questions." The legal meaning is the original and more precise one. A researcher encountering "apposer" in older English legal sources should not read it as a generic reference to an interrogator but as a specific term of art for this exchequer office.
---
Why It Matters in Research
APPOSER is an obsolete term of English administrative law. It appears almost exclusively in historical sources — Tudor and Stuart period exchequer records, early common law treatises, and the older law dictionaries — and has no living role in modern legal systems.
Researchers will encounter APPOSER primarily when working with pre-nineteenth-century English fiscal or administrative materials. The key practical point is that the term is consistently tied to one office and one function: examining sheriffs' accounts at the exchequer. It does not migrate into American law, colonial practice, or general equity proceedings.
The qualifier "foreign" in "foreign apposer" is a potential trap. In this context, "foreign" does not mean international or non-English; it is a term of art within exchequer procedure, distinguishing this officer's jurisdiction or duties from other internal exchequer officers. Researchers unfamiliar with exchequer terminology may misread references to the "foreign apposer" as pointing to some cross-border function, which would be incorrect.
Burrill's entry is the most useful of the historical sources for understanding the procedural mechanics: the apposer examined the estreats against the record and put specific questions to the sheriff about each item. This detail matters if you are reconstructing how exchequer accountability worked in practice rather than simply identifying the officer by title.
The term also serves as a navigational marker. Encountering APPOSER in a source anchors it firmly within English exchequer administration and helps date or contextualize the material, since the office predates modern audit and accountability structures.
---
Historical Dictionary Support
The four source dictionaries are in close agreement. All identify the apposer as an exchequer officer examining sheriffs' accounts, and all note the "foreign apposer" designation. There is no material disagreement among them on substance.
Burrill adds the most procedural texture, specifying that the officer examined the sheriff's estreats against the record and questioned the sheriff on each particular sum — a detail absent from the Black's entries, which are more summary. Bouvier's entry is essentially concordant with Burrill's in substance, if briefer in expression.
The Black's entries (both editions) append the definition of APOSTILLE or APPOSTILLE immediately following APPOSER, an artifact of alphabetical arrangement in the original texts. Researchers working from scanned or transcribed versions of these dictionaries should be alert to the fact that definitions for APPOSER and APOSTILLE are adjacent and occasionally run together in imperfect reproductions — the two terms are unrelated.
None of the historical dictionaries explain the political or administrative history of the office, its creation, or its abolition. For that context, Blackstone's Commentaries (1 Bl. Comm. 426), cited by Black's, is the appropriate starting point.
---
Jurisdictional Note
The apposer was a specifically English institution with no established equivalent in American law. Colonial American fiscal administration did not replicate the exchequer structure, and the office does not appear in American statutory or common law development. Research on this term is effectively confined to English legal history.
---
Encyclopedia Cross-Reference
See Law Mind Encyclopedia — Exchequer (for the institutional framework within which the apposer operated); Sheriff (for the office subject to the apposer's examination).
---