Definition
A Latin term from medieval law denoting the payment of money by weight rather than by count or tale. Under this method, the value of a monetary obligation was discharged by placing coins on a scale to reach the required weight, rather than by simply counting out a specified number of coins. The practice arose because coins in circulation frequently varied in actual metal content due to clipping, wear, or debasement, making payment by weight a more reliable measure of true value.
---
Why It Matters in Research
This term appears almost exclusively in sources dealing with medieval English and continental monetary practice. Researchers will encounter it in glossaries appended to older treatises, in Year Book commentary, and in works on feudal obligations and rent payment. It has no modern legal application and no surviving statutory or common law context.
The primary research trap is scope: appensura is a term of historical monetary administration, not of contract or property law in any functional modern sense. Do not expect to find it in post-seventeenth-century primary sources except as an antiquarian reference. If you are tracing a historical obligation described as dischargeable by appensura, the surrounding document will almost always be a feudal tenure instrument, a customal, or a manorial record.
Cross-reference value: appensura connects directly to the broader problem of medieval currency reliability. Understanding it requires familiarity with related monetary terms — librata, numerata pecunia, and the distinction between payment by tale (per numerationem) and payment by weight (per appensuram). Burrill is the most useful of the shelf sources here, as he flags the Latin root appendere (to weigh out) and connects appensura to the practice of payment at the scale, a phrase that more precisely captures what the term means in context. Black's first and second editions both cite Cowell's Interpreter (1607) as the authority, and researchers relying solely on Black's should go directly to Cowell for any depth.
---
Historical Dictionary Support
The four shelf sources are substantially consistent but vary in depth. Black's first and second editions offer the shortest treatment — a single sentence defining appensura as "payment of money by weight instead of by count" with a bare citation to Cowell. The second edition adds nothing substantive.
Burrill adds meaningful context: he identifies the Latin derivation from appendere, describes the act as "payment at the scale," and again cites Cowell. This remains the most useful formulation because "payment at the scale" preserves the physical character of the practice in a way that "payment by weight" alone does not.
The Rapalje & Lawrence entry reproduced in the source material does not contain a genuine appensura definition — the text reproduced is a fragmentary entry on "appearance" and related terms, apparently the result of a scanning or indexing error in the corpus. Researchers should treat Rapalje & Lawrence as a non-source for this term.
No shelf source disagrees on substance. The limitation shared by all is that none contextualizes why weight-based payment existed or connects it to the broader medieval monetary problem of coin debasement. Cowell's Interpreter, the original authority cited, remains the best starting point for any deeper research.
---
Jurisdictional Note
Appensura is a term of English medieval law with roots in continental monetary practice. It has no meaningful jurisdictional variation in the modern sense; the term predates the common law jurisdictional framework that makes such comparisons relevant.
---