WRONG

10 definitions found across Law Mind sources

WRONGAuthored
The Law Mind • 1406 words
Definition
A wrong is an invasion or violation of another's right, whether by act or omission, for which the law recognizes injury and, typically, a remedy. The concept is the direct correlate of legal right: wherever a right exists, its violation constitutes a wrong. In legal usage, wrong operates at two distinct levels: 1. Private wrong (civil wrong): An injury to an individual — a tort, breach of contract, or other actionable violation — for which the aggrieved party may seek a remedy in their own name. The focus is on the harm to the individual right-holder. 2. Public wrong: An offense against the community or the state — what we now call a crime — for which the government, not a private party, brings prosecution. Anderson's cross-reference to CRIMEN and DELICTUM captures this division precisely. Bouvier states the foundational principle concisely: a wrong is an invasion of right to the damage of the party who suffers it. Critically, wrong at common law was understood to consist in the injury done, not ordinarily in the purpose or mental state behind it — a point with lasting significance for strict liability and intentional tort doctrine. ---
Common Language
Modern common usage (Wiktionary): Something immoral or not good; the opposite of right; the concept of badness; an instance of treating someone unjustly. Historical common usage (Webster's 1913): Webster's 1913 entry for this form of the word redirects to a past tense of "wring" — an artifact of alphabetization — reflecting how ordinary dictionaries of the period handled the word primarily as a moral or directional descriptor rather than a legal term of art. The gap matters. In common speech, "wrong" is broadly moral and subjective — something can feel wrong without causing injury and without any legal consequence. In law, wrong is defined by the violation of a recognized right and the existence of cognizable damage. Not every moral failing is a legal wrong; and some legal wrongs (certain strict liability torts, for example) may attach without any moral fault at all. ---
Common Confusion
Wrong vs. injury vs. tort: These terms are used loosely and sometimes interchangeably in historical sources, but they carry distinct weights. "Injury" (Latin injuria) in classical common law usage often meant the legal wrong itself — the violation of right — not merely physical harm. Burrill explicitly cross-references injuria to wrong. Modern usage tends to reserve "injury" for the harm suffered and "tort" for the cause of action, while "wrong" remains the broadest umbrella. Researchers reading older texts should not assume that "injury" means physical damage; it may mean the wrong itself. Wrong vs. crime: The public/private wrong distinction has existed for centuries, but the vocabulary was less settled in earlier materials. Older treatises and dictionaries sometimes use "public wrong" and "crime" interchangeably; others treat all wrongs as a unified category with public and private subcategories. Anderson's entry on "criminal" reflects this overlap. ---
Core Elements
Burrill's formulation provides the clearest structural account. A wrong requires: 1. A right existing in another party (the violation has no legal content without a correlative right). 2. An invasion of that right — either by positive act or by omission (withholding what is due, or failing to comply with a legal duty). 3. An injury to the party whose right is violated. Motive and mental state are not always elements. Bouvier's caution that wrong "consists in the injury done, and not commonly in the purpose or mental or physical" state of the actor tracks the common law's historically objective orientation — refined but not abandoned by modern doctrine. ---
Recognized Forms
/SUBTYPES Public wrong: A violation of rights and duties owed to the community at large; prosecuted by the state. Corresponds to what modern law calls a crime. Private wrong: A violation of rights belonging to an individual; remedied by civil action. Encompasses torts and, in some older formulations, breaches of private obligations. Mixed wrong: Recognized in earlier common law literature — acts that simultaneously offend public order and injure a private party (assault, for example), giving rise to both criminal prosecution and civil liability. ---
Why It Matters in Research
"Wrong" is a foundational organizing concept in common law legal theory, and its appearance in historical sources is often structural rather than technical. When Blackstone or Bouvier organizes an entire volume around the distinction between rights and wrongs, they are using the term architecturally — as a classification system for all of private and public law, not as a standalone cause of action. Researchers working in the Law Mind corpus should watch for three navigational traps: First, the public/private distinction does not map cleanly onto modern criminal/civil categories in early materials. Pre-19th century sources frequently treat public and private wrongs within the same analytical framework, and what looks like a tort discussion may be embedded in what is functionally criminal law territory. Second, the treatment of mental state has shifted substantially. Early sources (Bouvier, Burrill) reflect a period when wrong was largely objective — defined by the fact of invasion, not the actor's intent. Modern doctrine has complicated this considerably, particularly for intentional torts and constitutional torts. Reading historical sources through a modern mens rea lens will distort meaning. Third, compound legal terms built on "wrong" — wrongful death, wrongful birth, wrongful life, wrongful termination — are modern constructions. Do not assume that locating "wrong" in a historical source sheds light on these specific doctrines; they require independent research in post-19th century materials. ---
Historical Dictionary Support
The historical dictionaries converge on a single core definition: a wrong is an injury, a tort, a violation of right or of law. Black's (both editions), Bouvier, and Burrill are nearly identical on this formulation, and all trace the concept to the correlative relationship between rights and wrongs — a framework drawn from Austin and, before him, Blackstone's Commentaries. Burrill adds value by explicitly grounding the definition in the Latin injuria and the Law French tort, flagging the multilingual heritage of the concept and its connection to injury doctrine. This is useful for researchers working with medieval and early modern materials where the vocabulary shifts across languages. Anderson's entry is less useful for the headword "wrong" itself but becomes important for the public/private distinction: his cross-references to CRIMEN and DELICTUM, and his treatment of "criminal" as the adjectival correlate of public wrong, illuminate the taxonomic structure underlying early American legal dictionaries. What the historical dictionaries largely omit: any account of strict liability or no-fault wrongs, the constitutional dimensions of wrongful state action, and the modern proliferation of statutory wrongs that exist independent of common law rights. These gaps are significant for researchers working in post-1900 materials. ---
Jurisdictional Note
The public/private wrong framework is a common law inheritance shared across American jurisdictions, England, and Commonwealth systems. Significant variation emerges, however, in how specific wrongs are classified and remedied — particularly where civil law influence is present (Louisiana, Quebec) and where statutory regimes have displaced or supplemented common law categories. Researchers should not assume that the historical common law taxonomy of wrongs operates identically across all jurisdictions. ---
Encyclopedia Cross-Reference
Wrongful Death and Survival Actions — Wrongful Death Statutes of Limitation (The Law Mind Torts & Personal Injury Encyclopedia) Wrongful Death and Survival Actions — Wrongful Death and Punitive Damages (The Law Mind Torts & Personal Injury Encyclopedia) Damages and Remedies in Tort — Wrongful Birth and Wrongful Life Damages (The Law Mind Torts & Personal Injury Encyclopedia) ---
Related Terms
Right (legal) — the correlative concept; no wrong without a right Tort — the primary private law instantiation of civil wrong Injury / Injuria — partially synonymous in historical usage; requires careful disambiguation Crime — the modern term for public wrong Delict — civil law analog to tort; compare DELICTUM Cause of action — the procedural vehicle for asserting a private wrong Liability — the legal consequence of committing a wrong Wrongful death — modern statutory cause of action for fatal wrongs Strict liability — liability for wrong without fault; tests the mental-state limits of the traditional definition Remedy — the legal response to a wrong; see Bouvier's maxim: where the law gives a rightit gives a remedy
WRONGmain
Black's Law Dictionary • 1891
An injury; a tort; a violation of right or of law. The idea of rights naturally suggests the correl- ative one of wrongs; for every right is capable of being violated. A right to receive payment for goods sold (for example) implies a wrong on the part of him who owes, but withholds the price; a right to live in personal security, a wrong on the part of him who commits personal violence. And therefore, while, in a general point of view, the law is intended for the establishment and mainte- nance of rights, we find it, on closer examination, to be dealing both with rights and wrongs. It first fixes the character and definition of rights, and then, with a view to their effectual security, pro- ceeds to define wrongs, and to devise the means by which the latter shall be prevented or re- dressed. 1 Steph. Comm. 126. AM.DICT.LAW-79
WRONGmain
Black's Law Dictionary (2nd Ed.) • 1910
An injury; atort; a violation of right or of law. The idea of righta naturally suggests the correlative one of wrongs; for every right is capable of being violated. A right to receive pay: ment for goods sold (for example) implies a wrong on the part of him who owes, but withholds the price; a right to live in personal security, a wrong on the part of him who commits personal violence. And therefore, while, in a general. point of view, the law is intended for the establishment and maintenance of rights, we find it, on closer examination, to be dealing both with rights and wrongs. It first fixes the character and definition of rights, and then, with a view to their effectual security, proceeds to define wrongs, and to devise the means by which the latter shall be prevented or redressed. 1 Steph. Comm. 126. —Private wrongs. The violation of public or private rights, when considered in reference to the injury sustained by the individual, and consequently as subjects for civil redress or compensation. 3 Steph. Comm. 356; Huntineton v. Attrill, 146 U. S. 657, 13 Sup. Ct. 224, 36 L. Ed. 1123; Tomlin v. Hildreth, 65 N. J. Law, 438, 47 Atl. 649.—PublHe wrongs. Violations of public rights and duties which affect the whole community, considered as a community; crimes and misdemeanors. 3 BI. Comm. 2; 4 Bl). Comm. 1.—Real wrong. In old English law. An injury to the freehold.
WRONGmain
Anderson's Dictionary of Law • 1890
Compare CRIMEN; DELICTUM. Criminal. 1, adj. Involving the commission of an offense against the public; also, pertaining to the law upon the subject of public wrongs or crimes. Opposed to civil, q. v. As, criminal or a criminal - act, action, case, contempt, conversation, court, information, intent, jurisdiction, law, libel, offense, procedure, process, prosecution, qq. v. 2, n. A person who has committed an indictable offense against the public. Compare CONVICT, 2. Criminate. To exhibit evidence of the commission of an indictable offense; to show or prove to be guilty of crime. No person "shall be compelled in any Criminal Case to be a witness against himself." 4 1 See Constitution, Amd. V. 2 See Constitution, Amd. VI. 3 See Constitution, Art. I. sec. 9, cl. 3; sec. 10, par. 1. As to criminal jurisdiction in the Federal courts see under COURTS, United States, and 26 Am. Law Reg. 703-9 (1887), cases. • Constitution, Amd. V. A witness cannot be compelled to answer a question which may expose him to a penalty or punishment.1 A statement made under compulsion cannot be used to show guilt: confessions (q. v.) are to be free and voluntary. But a party cannot claim this privilege. The danger to prosecution must be real. Exposure to civil liability, or to police prosecution, will not excuse. The court determines as to the reasonableness of the objection. Waiver of part of the privilege waives all. Pardon and statutes of indemnity do away with protection.3 If an accused person offers himself as a witness in his own behalf to disprove the charge he thereby waives his privilege as to all matters connected with the offense.4 An accused may be cross-questioned as to whether he has not been convicted of other charges of crime." A party on trial for violating an election law who testifies that he did not write names unlawfully entered in a registration book may be compelled, on cross-examination, to write the names in the presence of the jury, as evidence in rebuttal.. Excriminate. To free from a charge or suspicion of crime; to exculpate. Whence excriminatory. Incriminate. To charge with crime; to criminate; to inculpate. Whence incriminatory. Recriminate. To charge crime back upon an accuser; particularly, for the respondent in divorce proceedings to acknowledge the offense charged and to make a counteraccusation against the libelant. Whence recrimination, recriminative, recriminatory. Recrimination as a bar to divorce is not limited to a charge of the same nature as that alleged in the libel. It is sufficient if the counter-charge is a cause for divorce of equal grade. Thus, in Massachusetts, a respondent charged with adultery may reply that the libelant was at the time serving a sentence in the State prison.7 A violation of right or of a right; a privation of right; an injury; a tort, or a crime. In its broad sense, includes every injury to another, independent of the motives of the offender; but, in an instruction as to negligence, may not inappropriately refer to the failure to exercise the required degree of care where another may be injured.4 Legal wrong. Such transgression of right as the law takes cognizance of. Private wrong. An infringement or privation of a private or civil right belonging to an individual considered merely as an individual; frequently termed a civil injury.5 Public wrong. A breach and violation of a public right and duty, which affects the whole community, considered as a community; a crime or misdemeanor.5 Wrong-doer. A person who commits a civil injury; a tort-feasor. Wrongful; wrongfully. These words, referring to acts or intent, charge legal malice, q. v. They may import simply that a thing is contrary to law.6 Compare DELICTUM; ENORMIA; MALUM. See BENEFIT; CONTRIBUTION; CRIME; DAMAGES; INJURY; MERGER, 3; REMEDY; RIGHT; TORT; WAIVER; WILL, 1.
WRONGn.
Websters Unabridged Dictionary (1913) • 1913
imp. of Wring. Wrung. Chaucer.
WRONGa.
Websters Unabridged Dictionary (1913) • 1913
Twisted; wry; as, a wrong nose. [Obs.] Wyclif (Lev. xxi. 19). Not according to the laws of good morals, whether divine or human; not suitable to the highest and best end; not morally right; deviating from rectitude or duty; not just or equitable; not true; not legal; as, a wrong practice; wrong ideas; wrong inclinations and desires. Not fit or suitable to an end or object; not appropriate for an intended use; not according to rule; unsuitable; improper; incorrect; as, to hold a book with the wrong end uppermost; to take the wrong way. I have deceived you both; I have directed you to wrong places. Shak. Not according to truth; not conforming to fact or intent; not right; mistaken; erroneous; as, a wrong statement. Designed to be worn or placed inward; as, the wrong side of a garment or of a piece of cloth.
WRONGadv.
Websters Unabridged Dictionary (1913) • 1913
In a wrong manner; not rightly; amiss; morally ill; erroneously; wrongly. Ten censure wrong for one that writes amiss. Pope.
wrongnoun
Wiktionary (English) • 2026
Wiktionary contributorsCC BY-SA 4.0 • via Kaikki
Extracted and formatted for display by Law Mind. Source link opens the current Wiktionary page and its contributor history; it is not a frozen copy of this extract.
Something that is immoral or not good. | An instance of wronging someone (sometimes with possessive to indicate the wrongdoer). | The incorrect or unjust position or opinion. | The opposite of right; the concept of badness.
wrongadj
Wiktionary (English) • 2026
Wiktionary contributorsCC BY-SA 4.0 • via Kaikki
Extracted and formatted for display by Law Mind. Source link opens the current Wiktionary page and its contributor history; it is not a frozen copy of this extract.
Incorrect or untrue. | Asserting something incorrect or untrue. | Immoral, not good, bad. | Improper; unfit; unsuitable. | Not working; out of order. | Designed to be worn or placed inward | Twisted; wry.
wrongadv
Wiktionary (English) • 2026
Wiktionary contributorsCC BY-SA 4.0 • via Kaikki
Extracted and formatted for display by Law Mind. Source link opens the current Wiktionary page and its contributor history; it is not a frozen copy of this extract.
In a way that isn't right; incorrectly, wrongly.

Explore the full Law Mind legal research platform.

SubscribeEncyclopediaSign In