As designating a commodity or a subject of ownership, this term has the same meaning in law as in common speech ; but in another sense, and especially in the plural, it may designate a body of water, such as a river, a lake, or an ocean, or an ‘aggregate of such bodies of water, as in the phrases “foreign waters,” “waters of the United States,” and the like. Water is neither land nor tenement nor susceptible of absolute ownership. It is'a movable thing and must of necessity continue common by the law of nature. It admits only of a transient Wa aS d property, and if it escapes for a moment, the right to it is gone forever, the qualified owner having no legal power of reclamation. It is not capable of being sued for by the name of “water,” nor by a caiculation of its cubical or superficial measure; but the suit must be brought for the land which lies at the bottom covered with water. As water is not land, neither is it a tenement, because it is not of a permanent nature, nor the subject of absolute property. It is not in any possible sense real estate, and hence is not embraced in a covenant of general warranty. Mitchell v. Warner, 5 Conn. 518. —Coast waters. See Coast.—Foreign waters. Those belonging to another nation or country or subject to another jurisdiction, as distinguished from ‘domestic’ waters. The Pilot, 50 Fed. 437, 1 C. C. A. 523.—Inland waters. See INLAND.—Navigable waters. See NAVIGABLE.—Percolating waters. Those which pass through the ground beneath the surface of the earth without any definite channel, and do not form a part of the body or flow, surface or subterranean, of any watercourse. They may be either rain waters which are slowly infiltrating through the soil or waters seeping through the banks or the bed of a stream, and which have so far left the bed and the other waters as to have lost their character as a part of the flow of that stream. Vineland Irr. Dist. v. Azusa Irr. Co., 126 Cal. 486, 58 Pac. 1057, 46 L. R. A. 820; Los An- gles v. Pomeroy, 124 Cal. 597, 57 Pac. 585; erriman Irr. Co. v. Keel, tah, 96, 680 Pac. 719; Deadwood Cent. K. Co. v. Barker, 14 8. D. 558, 86 N. W. 619; Montecito Val. Water Co. v. Santa Barbara, 144 Cal. 578, 77 Pac. 1113.—Private waters. Non-navigable streams, or bodies of water not open to the resort and use of the general public, but entirely owned and controlled by one or more individuals—Public waters. Such as are adapted for the purposes of navigation, or those to which the general public have a right of access, as distinguished from artificial lakes, ponds, and other bodies of water privately owned, or similar natural bodies of water owned exclusively by one or more persons. See Lamprey v. Metcalf, 52 Minn. 181, 53 N. W. 1139, 18 L. R. A. 670, 38 Am. St. Rep. 541; Carter v. Thurston, 58 N. H. 104, 42 Am. Rep. 584; Cobb v. Davenport, 32 N. J. Law, 369; West Point Water-Power Co. v. State, 49 Neb. 223, 68 N. W. 507: State v. Theriault, 70 Vt. 617, 41 Atl. 1080, 43 L. R. A. 290, 67 Am. St. Rep. 648.— Subterranean waters. Waters which lie wholly’ beneath the surface of the ground, and which either ooze and seep through the subsurface strata without pursuing any defined course or channel, (percolating waters.) or flow in a permanent and regular but invisible course, or lie under the earth in a more or less immovable body, as a subterranean lake.—Surface waters. As distinguished from the waters of a natural] stream, lake, or pond, surface waters are such as diffuse themselves over the surface of the ground, following no defined course or channel, and not gathering into or forming any more definite body of water than a mere bog or marsh. They generally originate in rains and melting snows, but the flood waters of a river may also be considered as surface waters if they become separated from the main current, or leave it never to return, and spread out over lower ground. See Schaefer v. Marthaler, 34 Minn. 487, 26 N. W. 726, 57 Am. Rep. 40; Crawford v. Rambo, 44 Ohio St. 279, 7 N. B 429; New York, etc., R. Co. v. Hamlet Hay Co., 149 Ind. 344, 47 N. E. 1060; Cairo, etce., R. Co. v. Brevoort (C. C.) 62 Fed. 129, 25 L of swimming it was deemed an evidence of his guilt; but, if he sunk, he was acquitted. —Water-power. The water-power to which miperian owner is entitled consists of the fall in the stream, when in its natural state, as it passes through his land, or along the aa? f of it; or, in other words, it consists of the di ference of level between the surface where the stream first touches his land, and the surface where it leaves it. McCalmont v. Whitaker, 8 Rawle, (Pa.) 90, 23 Am. Dec. 102.—Water right. <A legal right, in the nature of a corporeal hereditament, to use the water of a natural stream or water furnished through a ditch or canal, for general or specific purposes, such as irrigation, mining, power, or domestic use, either to its full capacity or to a measured extent or during a defined portion of the time. See Hill v. Newman, 5 Cal. 63 Am. Dec. 140; Cary v. Daniels, 8 Metc. (Mass.) 480, 41 Am. Dec. 532; Canal Co. v. Hess, 6 Colo. App. 497, 42 Pac. 50.—Waterscape. An aqueduct or passage for water.—Waters of the United States. All waters within the United States which are navigable for the purposes of commerce, or whose navigation successfully aids commerce, are included in this term. The Danfl Ball, 6 Fed. Cas. 1161.