In real property law. A real covenant by the grantor of lands, for himself and his heirs, to warrant and defend the title and-possession of the estate granted, to the grantee and his heirs, whereby, either upon voucher, or judgment in the writ of warrantia charte, and the eviction of the grantee by paramount title, the grantor was bound to recompense him with other lands of equal value. Co. Litt. 365a. In sales of personal property. A warranty is a statement or representation made by the seller of goods, contemporaneously with and as a part of the contract of sale, though collateral to the express object of it, having reference to the character, quality, or title of the goods, and by which he promises or undertakes to insure that certain facts are or shall be as he then represents them. A warranty is an engagement by which a seller assures to a buyer the existence of some fact affecting the transaction, whether past, present, or future. Civ. Code Cal. § 1763. In contracts. An undertaking or stipulation, in writing, or verbally, that a certain fact in relation to the subject of a contract is or shall be as it is stated or promised to be. A warranty differs from a representation in that a warranty must always be given contemporaneously with, and as part of, the contract; whereas a representation precedes and induces to the contract. And, while that is their difference in nature, their difference in consequence or effect is this: that, upon breach of warranty, (or false warranty,) the contract remains binding, and damages only are recoverable for the breach; whereas, upon a false representation, the defrauded party may elect to avoid the contract, and recover the entire price paid. Brown. The same transaction cannot be characterized as a warranty and a fraud at the same time. A warranty rests upon contract, while fraud, or fraudulent representations have no element of contract in them, but are essentially a tort. When judges or Jaw-writers speak of a fraudulent warranty, the language is neither accurate nor perspicuous. If there is a breach of warranty, it cannot be said that the warranty was fraudulent, with any more propriety than an other contract can be said to have been fraudulent, because there has been a breach of it. On the other hand, to speak of a false representation as a contract or warranty, or as tending to prove a contract or warranty, is a per version of language and of correct ideas. Rose v. Hurley, 39 Ind. 81. -In insurance. In the law of insurance, “warranty” menns any assertion or undertaking on the part of the assured, whether ~ 20 WARRANTY expressed in the contract or capable of being annexed to it, on the strict and literal truth or performance of which the Hability of the underwriter is made to depend. Maude & P. Shipp. 377; Sweet. —Affirmative warranty. In the law of insurance, warranties may be either affirmative or promissory. Affirmative warranties may be either express or implied, but they usually consist of positive representations in the policy of the existence of some fact or state of things at the time, or previous to the time, of the making of the policy; and they are, in general, conditions precedent, which, if untrue. whether material to the risk or not, the policy does not attach, as it is not the contract of the insurer. Maupin y. Insurance Co., 53 W. Va. S57, 45 S.