VERBA PRECARIA - The Law Mind Legal Dictionary

VERBA PRECARIAAuthored

The Law Mind • 825 words

Definition

Verba precaria (Latin: "precatory words") are words of prayer, entreaty, or request — as opposed to words of command or direct legal obligation — used in a will, deed, or other instrument to express a wish or desire that a beneficiary act in a particular way. In the civil law tradition, verba precaria were recognized as words capable of creating a trust or trust-like obligation (fidei-commissum), even though their grammatical form was one of request rather than mandate.

The canonical examples from the civil law are peto ("I beg"), rogo ("I ask"), and volo ("I wish" or "I want"). When a testator wrote that he asked or desired a legatee to convey property to a third party, those words — though polite in form — could be read by courts as imposing a legal duty on the recipient.

Common Confusion

Verba precaria is frequently confused with purely aspirational or hortatory language that creates no legal effect at all. The critical distinction is between words that are merely expressive of sentiment (no legal consequence) and verba precaria properly understood, which in equity and civil law traditions were treated as sufficient to raise a trust or binding obligation. The confusion is compounded by the fact that English courts of equity, particularly in the development of precatory trusts, sometimes enforced such words and sometimes refused to, depending on whether sufficient certainty of intention could be found. A researcher encountering verba precaria in a historical source should not assume the words were treated as legally inoperative simply because they lack imperative form.

Why It Matters in Research

The significance of verba precaria shifts dramatically depending on the legal tradition and the time period. In Roman and civil law sources, the term appears in discussions of fidei-commissa — obligations imposed on an heir or legatee by words of trust rather than direct command — and the question was whether such words bound the recipient in conscience and in law.

In English equity, the doctrine of precatory trusts gave verba precaria a second life. Through much of the nineteenth century, English courts enforced precatory words in wills as creating binding trusts, reasoning that the testator's wish expressed an intention sufficient to impose an obligation. By the late nineteenth century, the courts pulled back sharply, requiring clearer evidence of mandatory intent before finding a trust. Researchers working in equity materials from roughly 1840–1900 will find substantial doctrinal instability on this point.

In American jurisdictions, the treatment of precatory language in wills remains a live issue in trust and estate law, though the terminology verba precaria itself appears far less frequently in American sources than in English and civilian ones. Modern American cases are more likely to discuss "precatory language" without invoking the Latin phrase.

Trap for historical researchers: Black's entry for verba precaria runs directly into the text of adjacent Latin maxims (verba pro re et subjecta materia accipi debent; verba quae aliquid operari possunt non debent esse superflua), which are entirely separate legal principles. This is an artifact of alphabetical arrangement, not a substantive connection. Do not read those maxims as definitions or elaborations of verba precaria.

Burrill is more useful here than Black's: he supplies the specific Latin examples (peto, rogo, volo) and explicitly cross-references verba fidei-commissaria, pointing the researcher toward the civil law trust tradition where the concept originates and where it has the most precise doctrinal content.

Historical Dictionary Support

Black's and Burrill's agree on the core definition — words of prayer or entreaty, used in the civil law to create a trust — but Burrill's entry is richer and more navigable. Burrill supplies the concrete examples (peto, rogo, volo), links the concept explicitly to fidei-commissa through the cross-reference to verba fidei-commissaria, and situates the term properly within the civilian tradition. Black's entry is compressed to the point of being incomplete on its own, and its value is limited without recourse to the adjacent maxims, which are unrelated.

Neither dictionary addresses the English equity development of precatory trusts with any depth under this heading, which is a significant gap. A researcher relying solely on these entries would miss the nineteenth-century English case law that gave the concept its most practically significant application in common law jurisdictions. Treatise sources on equity and trusts — particularly those treating testamentary trusts and certainty of intention — are necessary supplements.

Jurisdictional Note

The term and its civil law framing appear most naturally in civilian and mixed jurisdictions. In common law jurisdictions, the operative doctrine is "precatory trust" or "precatory language," and whether such words bind a legatee is governed by trust law principles requiring certainty of subject matter, object, and intention. American jurisdictions generally require clear mandatory intent before finding a trust; precatory language alone is usually insufficient.

VERBA PRECARIAmain

Black's Law Dictionary • 1891

Lat. In the civil law. Precatory words; words of trust, or used to create a trust. Verba pro re et subjecta materia accipi debent. Words ought to be understood in favor of the thing and subject-matter. A maxim of the civilians. Calvin. Verba quæ aliquid operari possunt non debent esse superflua. Words which can have any kind of operation ought not to be [considered] superfluous. Calvin. Verba, quantumvis generalia, ad apti- tudinem restringantur, etiamsi nullam aliam paterentur restrictionem. Words, howsoever general, are restrained to fitness, (ie., to harmonize with the subject-matter,) though they would bear no other restriction. Spiegelius. Verba relata hoc maxime operantur per referentiam, ut in eis inesse videntur. Related words [words connected with others by reference] have this particular operation by the reference, that they are considered as being inserted in those [clauses which refer to them.] Co. Litt. 96, 359a. Words to which reference is made in an instrument have the same effect and operation as if they were inserted in the clauses referring to them. Broom, Max. 673. Verba secundum materiam subjectam intelligi nemo est qui nesciat. There is no one who does not know that words are to be understood according to their subject-mat- ter. Calvin. Verba semper accipienda sunt in miti- ori sensu. Words are always to be taken in the milder sense. 4 Coke, 13a. Verba strictæ significationis ad latam extendi possunt, si subsit ratio. Words of a strict or narrow signification may be ex- tended to a broad meaning, if there be ground in reason for it. A maxim of the civilians. Calvin. Verba sunt indices animi. Words are the indices or indicators of the mind or thought. Latch, 106.

VERBA PRECARIAmain

Burrill's Law Dictionary • 1870

Lat. In the terentur restrictionem. Words, however civil law. Precatory words; words of general they may be, are restrained for the prayer or entreaty; words of trust, or used purpose of adaptation, even though they to create a trust, (verba fidei-commissaria.) may admit of no other kind of restriction. Such as peto, (I beg;) rogo, (I ask;) volo, A maxim of the civilians. Zasius. Spiegelius. Prateus. Verba quæ aliquid operari possunt non debent esse superflua. Words which can have any kind of operation, ought not to be considered superfluous. Calv. Lex. Spiegelius. Prateus. Verba relata hoc maxime operantur per referentiam, ut in eis inesse videntur. Related words [words connected with others by reference] have this particular operation by the reference, that they are considered as being inserted in those [clauses which refer to them.] Co. Litt. 9 b, 359 a. Lord Ellenborough, C. J. 14 East, 568. Words to which reference is made in an instrument, have the same effect and operation as if they were inserted in the clauses referring to them. Broom's Max. 288, [521.] Lord Coke gives the following illustration of this maxim: "If a father enfeoff a son, to have and to hold to him and to his heirs, and the son enfeoffs the father as fully as the father enfeoffed him, by this the father hath a fee simple." Co. Litt. 9 b. It is sometimes more briefly expressed, Verba relata inesse videntur. Tindal, C. J. 4 Man. & Gr. 4. Heath, J. 5 Taunt. 337. Lord Ellenborough, C. J. 6 M. & S. 212. Verba secundum materiam subjectam intelligi nemo est qui nesciat. There is no one who does not know that words are to be understood according to their subject matter. Calv. Lex. Baldus. Spiegelius. Verba semper accipienda sunt in mitiori sensu. Words are always to be taken in the milder sense. 4 Co. 13 a. An old maxim in the law of slander, now exploded. See Mitior sensus. (I will;) mando, (I commend.) Also deprecor, (I entreat;) cupio, (I desire;) injungo, (I enjoin ;) desidero, (I desire.) Calv. Lex. The most common words of trust were peto, rogo, volo, mando, fidei tuæ committo. Inst. 2. 24. 3.

Explore the full Law Mind legal research platform.

Subscribe Encyclopedia Sign In