Definition
A writ directing that the foot of a fine — the official record of a final concord settled before justices in eyre or other authorized courts — be certified and transmitted into the Court of Chancery. The writ served an administrative and record-keeping function, ensuring that the enrolled memorandum of a concluded fine was formally conveyed to the chancery, where it could be preserved and acted upon as an authoritative instrument of title or settlement.
---
Why It Matters in Research
This term belongs to a tightly bounded historical context: the medieval English common law machinery surrounding fines and recoveries. Researchers encountering it will almost certainly be working in pre-modern English legal sources, plea rolls, or conveyancing treatises rather than any living body of law.
Several navigational points are worth flagging:
The term is inseparable from the broader fine and recovery system, which was the dominant method of effecting conveyances of real property in England from roughly the 13th through the 19th centuries. The writ itself is a procedural instrument within that system, not a substantive doctrine. Understanding it requires first understanding what a fine was — a fictitious suit concluded by agreement, the record of which was tripartite, with the foot (the bottom portion of the indenture) retained by the court.
The justices in eyre referenced in Black's are significant: eyre courts were itinerant royal commissions that declined in use by the late 14th century, which helps date the active use of this specific writ form. Researchers working in later periods will find that the mechanics of certifying fines into chancery evolved, and this precise writ form may appear primarily in sources tied to the height of the eyre system.
The Registrum Omnium Brevium (Reg. Orig.) cited by Black's is a real historical source — a compilation of original writs used in English common law courts, with various editions published in the 16th and 17th centuries. It is the natural place to trace the formal wording and procedural context of this writ. Researchers should be aware that citations to "Reg. Orig." without further specification may refer to any of several editions; the pagination Black's provides (669) would need to be verified against the specific edition held.
Because this writ is purely procedural and historically extinct, it carries no jurisdictional variation in any modern sense. It will not appear in American law reports or statutes. Its relevance is confined to English legal history, conveyancing history, and the paleographic study of medieval and early modern legal records.
---
Historical Dictionary Support
Black's Law Dictionary (2nd Ed.) provides the only dictionary treatment among the Law Mind shelf sources, and its entry is characteristically spare: a single sentence identifying the writ's function and citing the Registrum Omnium Brevium. No definition of the constituent Latin terms is offered, and no procedural elaboration is given.
The entry reflects Black's general treatment of obsolete English writs — catalogued rather than explained. Researchers should not expect the definition alone to supply adequate context for working with primary sources. The writ's function (certifying the foot of a fine into chancery) is accurately stated, but the entry does not situate it within the larger fine and recovery system, explain what the foot of a fine was, or distinguish this writ from other certification or enrollment instruments.
No other historical dictionaries in the Law Mind collection appear to contain an entry for this term, which is consistent with its extreme technical specificity and narrow historical use.
---
Encyclopedia Cross-Reference
See Law Mind Encyclopedia: Fines and Recoveries; Justices in Eyre; Court of Chancery (Historical)
---