VANT

6 definitions found across Law Mind sources

VANTAuthored
The Law Mind • 472 words
Definition
"Vant" is not a recognized legal term of art. It appears in historical sources only as an obsolete or variant spelling — Webster's 1913 directs readers to "vaunt," while Wiktionary treats it as a pronunciation spelling of "want." No independent legal definition exists for "vant" in the Law Mind corpus or in the principal historical legal dictionaries. The source material surfaced under this entry — concerning the English Employers and Workmen Act of 1875, the definition of "laborer" in lien and contract-of-service law, and railroad safety obligations — does not define or reference "vant" as a legal concept. Those passages appear to have been retrieved incidentally and belong to adjacent entries (see LABORER; RAILROAD; EMPLOYER AND EMPLOYEE).
Common Confusion
VANT / VAUNT / WANT: These three terms are the likely sources of confusion when "vant" appears in a legal document. "Vaunt" (to boast; to make an extravagant claim) is an archaic English word with occasional pleading-era usage. "Want" is a high-frequency legal term of art with entirely distinct meaning — deficiency, absence, or lack of a required legal element. A researcher should determine from context which word was intended before drawing any doctrinal conclusion.
Why It Matters in Research
Researchers encountering "vant" in historical legal documents should treat it as a transcription artifact, archaic spelling variant, or OCR error rather than a term with independent legal content. The most likely candidates for the intended term are: — VAUNT: an archaic verb meaning to boast or make an arrogant claim; occasionally appears in pleading literature describing a party's assertions. — WANT: in legal contexts, "want" carries specific technical weight — "want of consideration," "want of jurisdiction," "want of prosecution" — each of which has a distinct doctrinal meaning. A historical document rendering "want" as "vant" should be read with that body of doctrine in mind. OCR-generated or transcribed corpus documents from the 17th through 19th centuries are particularly prone to rendering "w" as "v" or vice versa, especially in secretary hand manuscripts. A search for "vant of consideration" or "vant of jurisdiction" in historical sources almost certainly reflects "want of" in the original.
Historical Dictionary Support
Neither Bouvier's Law Dictionary nor Rapalje & Lawrence defines "vant" as a legal term. The entries retrieved under this heading address unrelated subjects (employment contracts, the laborer's status in lien law, and railroad negligence) and should not be read as evidence that "vant" had legal meaning in those contexts. Webster's 1913 treats "vant" as an obsolete form of "vaunt" and adds nothing beyond the cross-reference. No historical legal dictionary in the Law Mind corpus assigns doctrinal content to "vant" as a standalone entry.
Related Terms
WANT (of consideration; of jurisdiction; of prosecution) VAUNT LABORER (for the substantive content of adjacent retrieved passages) EMPLOYER AND EMPLOYEE RAILROAD (negligence doctrine)
VANTmain
Bouvier's Law Dictionary • 1928
Under this act of 1875 (38 and 39 Vict. c. 90), justices of the peace have juris- diction in many cases where questions arise as to the rights or liabilities of either party to a contract of service, and County Courts also have jurisdiction in some of those matters. But this act does not apply to domestic or menial servants. Byrne.
VANTmain
Rapalje & Lawrence • 1883
LABORER, (defined). 34 Cal. 302; 82 Pa. St. 469. (who is). 5 How. (N. Y.) Pr. 454; 5 Binn. (Pa.) 169; 4 Best & S. 927. 77 Pa. St. 107. (who is not). 39 Mich. 47, 594; 38 Barb. (N. Y.) 390; 24 N. Y. 481; 81 N. C. 340; (equivalent to "employé"). 3 Stew. (N. J.) 590. 4 Com. T. 219. 124. (in an indictment applied to a female). Dig. 666 η. (in lien law). 77 Pa. St. 107; 2 Utah (in a statute). 24 N. Y. 482; 8 East LABORER OR SERVANT, (in a statute). 16 Hun (N. Y.) 186, 188. LABORER OR WORKMAN, (in mechanics' lien law). 84 Pa. St. 168; 24 Am. Rep. 189. LABORERS, (in railroad charter). 5 How. (N. Y.) Pr. 454.
VANTmain
Bouvier's Law Dictionary • 1928
A railroad company operating its road through the streets of a populous city is bound to observe extraordinary precau- tions for the safety of the public, particu- larly at street crossings; 40 La. Ann. 810; 70 Tex. 126; 84 Va. 63; 85 Ky. 224. It is the duty of the company to use on its cars, etc., all the modern improve- ments in machinery commonly used; 65 Barb. 92: 76 N. C. 454; 83 Ala. 518; 76 Ia. 387. Express business. Railroad companies are not required to transport the traffic of independent express companies over their lines in the manner in which such traffic is usually carried; or to do more as express carriers than to provide the public at large with reasonable express accom- modation. They need not furnish all ex- press companies equal facilities on their passenger trains; 117 U. S. 1; Miller and Field, JJ., dissenting; 70 Cal. 169; 57 Fed. Rap. 673; 43 N. J. Eq. 77. But it has been held that they may be compelled to admit the agents of express companies on their trains, with their safes; 6L. R. A. (N. C.) 271. And an early case held that a con- tract giving exclusive privileges to one ex- press company is void; 2 Phila. 107; and in Maine a statute provides for equal facilities to all; 81 Me. 92. It has been held that a railroad company cannot as- sume the exclusive right of carrying on the express business over its own lines; 4 Fed. Rep. 481; but this was decided prior to the case in 117 U. S. 1, supra. See EXPRESS COMPANIES; FACILITIES. The exclusive grants to railroad com- panies are to be strictly construed in favor of the corporation, and liberally expounded in favor of public rights and interests; 11 Pet. 420; 13 How. 71; 1 La. Ann. 253. The power to build a railroad includes the power to build switches; 56 Pa, 825; but all customers have not an equal right to have switches built for them. 31 U. S. App. 252. An act providing that a carrier accept- ing goods for transportation over connect- ing lines assumes an obligation for their safe carriage to the point of destination, etc., is not a regulation of interstate com- merce, but establishes a rule of evidence and does not conflict with the United States constitution touching interstate commerce; 169 U. S. 311. But a carrier is not liable beyond its own lines, unless its liability be established by clear evidence; 155 U. S. 333. See СоMMON CARRIERS. A railroad corporation is a person within the fourteenth amendment declaring that no state shall deprive any person of prop-
VANTv.
Websters Unabridged Dictionary (1913) • 1913
See Vaunt. [Obs.]
vantverb
Wiktionary (English) • 2026
Wiktionary contributorsCC BY-SA 4.0 • via Kaikki
Extracted and formatted for display by Law Mind. Source link opens the current Wiktionary page and its contributor history; it is not a frozen copy of this extract.
Pronunciation spelling of want.

Explore the full Law Mind legal research platform.

SubscribeEncyclopediaSign In