Definition
A collective term for the standard set of title-assurance promises that a seller of real property is understood to provide when a contract of sale or deed simply states that the conveyance will be made "with usual covenants" or "with full covenants," without enumerating them individually. The phrase operates as shorthand: invoking it binds the grantor to insert, as a matter of law or established convention, the following specific covenants into the deed:
1. Covenant of Seisin — the grantor warrants that he actually owns the estate he purports to convey.
2. Covenant of Right to Convey — the grantor warrants that he has the legal authority to make the transfer (related to, but distinct from, seisin).
3. Covenant of Quiet Enjoyment — the grantor promises that the grantee will not be disturbed in possession by a party claiming through a superior title.
4. Covenant of General Warranty — the grantor agrees to defend the grantee's title against all lawful claims and, if the grantee is evicted, to compensate for the loss.
5. Covenant of Further Assurance — the grantor agrees to execute any additional instruments reasonably necessary to perfect the grantee's title.
6. Covenant Against Encumbrances — the grantor warrants that the property is free of liens, mortgages, easements, or other encumbrances not disclosed in the deed.
The precise composition of the "usual" set has varied by jurisdiction and era. Some authorities treat covenants of seisin and right to convey as a single promise; others separate them. The California Civil Code (§ 1733, as cited in Black's) codified a five-covenant list that omits the separate right-to-convey covenant while treating seisin as its functional equivalent.
---
Common Confusion
USUAL COVENANTS vs. STATUTORY COVENANTS vs. FULL COVENANTS: These phrases are closely related but not identical. "Statutory covenants" refers to the abbreviated covenantal language authorized by state recording or conveyancing statutes, which by operation of law import a defined list of promises — the list being whatever the relevant statute specifies, which may or may not match the common-law "usual" set. "Full covenants" is sometimes used synonymously with "usual covenants" but can also signal that all six traditional covenants are expressly included, as distinguished from a limited warranty deed that provides fewer. Researchers working with deeds or contracts that use any of these phrases must identify the jurisdiction and the controlling statute or case law to determine exactly which promises were made.
USUAL COVENANTS vs. RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS: No meaningful relationship. Restrictive covenants are promises limiting the use of land (e.g., no commercial use, architectural standards) and run with the land against future owners. Usual covenants are title-assurance promises running from grantor to grantee. The word "covenant" in each context carries a different operative meaning. Conflation is common among non-specialist researchers.
---
Why It Matters in Research
The phrase "usual covenants" is a trap for the historically inattentive researcher in at least three ways.
First, the composition of the set is not universal. The common-law tradition recognized the six covenants listed above, but nineteenth-century American jurisdictions diverged. Some states codified a shorter list; others expanded it. A contract clause promising "usual covenants" in an 1870 Massachusetts transaction may import a different set than the same clause in a contemporaneous California transaction. When researching any specific deed dispute or contract claim, always locate the controlling jurisdiction's statute or case law — do not assume the Black's enumeration controls.
Second, the present/future covenant distinction matters for remedies. Covenants of seisin, right to convey, and against encumbrances are present covenants: they are breached, if at all, at the moment of delivery, and the statute of limitations begins to run immediately. Covenants of warranty, quiet enjoyment, and further assurance are future covenants: they are breached only when the grantee is actually disturbed in possession or a demand for further assurance is made. This distinction affects whether a title claim is time-barred and what the grantee must prove. Historical sources often blur this division; the encyclopedia entry at realestate_21 addresses it in depth.
Third, "usual covenants" appears frequently in contract-for-deed and lease negotiation records where the parties agreed to a future conveyance "with usual covenants" without specifying them. In those contexts, determining what was promised requires reconstructing the jurisdiction's default rule at the time the contract was made — a task that may require period-specific sources, not only modern statutes.
---
Historical Dictionary Support
Black's Law Dictionary provides the core definition and ties it directly to California Civil Code § 1733, listing five covenants (seisin, quiet enjoyment, further assurance, general warranty, against encumbrances). Black's notes that "the result of the authorities" in lease contexts — where the agreement is silent — suggests a somewhat different implied set, signaling that the phrase was understood contextually: sale versus lease, and jurisdiction, both mattered.
Historical dictionaries generally agree on the core six covenants for fee simple conveyances but diverge on whether the covenant of right to convey is separate from seisin. English common-law sources treated them as distinct; American practice often merged them. This is not merely academic: a grantor who holds legal title but lacks authority to convey (e.g., because a co-tenant's consent is required) may have breached the right-to-convey covenant without breaching seisin.
What historical dictionaries largely omit is the procedural dimension: that present covenants ran with the land only in certain circumstances, and that remote grantees's ability to sue on a covenant depended on whether the covenant was held to run with the land under privity rules. For deeds in older chains of title, this question is live.
---
Jurisdictional Note
The composition and effect of "usual covenants" is statute-driven in many states. California, New York, and other early-codifying jurisdictions enacted specific lists that govern when the phrase appears in a deed or contract. In states without a comprehensive conveyancing statute, courts apply common-law rules that may draw on English precedent. Researchers dealing with transactions in any single state should treat the Black's enumeration as a starting point, not a controlling rule.
---
Encyclopedia Cross-Reference
realestate_21: Deed Covenants of Title — Present Covenants (Seisin, Right to Convey, Against Encumbrances) and Future Covenants (Warranty, Quiet Enjoyment, Further Assurances) | The Law Mind Real Estate Transactions & Construction Encyclopedia
---