UNASSESSED - The Law Mind Legal Dictionary

UNASSESSEDAuthored

The Law Mind • 801 words

Definition

Not having been subjected to formal assessment — that is, not having been evaluated, valued, or formally charged by a government authority for purposes of taxation or other official determination. In legal contexts, "unassessed" most often describes property that has not been placed on the tax rolls and assigned a taxable value by a public assessor, or a person or entity that has not been formally charged or evaluated for a particular tax, levy, or duty. The term may also appear in broader administrative contexts to describe any obligation, liability, or penalty that has been identified or incurred but not yet formally calculated and imposed by the relevant authority.

Common Language

Modern common usage (Wiktionary): Not having been assessed.

Historical common usage: No distinct entry in Webster's 1913; "assess" in that period carried its general meaning of fixing the amount of a charge or tax, so "unassessed" would have been understood as simply lacking such a fixing.

The gap between common and legal usage is narrow but consequential in research: in ordinary English, "unassessed" is a passive descriptor meaning an evaluation has not occurred. In legal and tax contexts, unassessed status has formal legal significance — it may determine whether a lien attaches, whether a statute of limitations has begun to run, whether property is subject to forced sale, or whether a taxpayer has standing to contest a charge. The word does not merely describe an administrative gap; it describes a specific legal condition with downstream consequences.

Why It Matters in Research

The term appears most frequently in property tax law, inheritance and estate taxation, and administrative penalty proceedings. Researchers should note several recurring traps:

First, "unassessed" and "exempt" are not synonymous. Property may be unassessed because it has been omitted from the rolls by error, or because it is of a class not yet reached in an assessment cycle — neither of which is the same as a formal exemption. Conflating the two will produce incorrect conclusions about a taxpayer's rights and obligations.

Second, in historical American property tax records and litigation, an unassessed parcel often created title and lien questions that are central to chain-of-title research. Tax deeds issued against assessed property could not validly reach unassessed property, and courts sometimes voided conveyances or tax sales on this basis. Researchers working with 19th- and early 20th-century land records should treat "unassessed" as a flag requiring closer examination of the assessment rolls and any subsequent proceedings.

Third, in federal tax law and modern administrative law, a tax "unassessed" against a taxpayer means the IRS or equivalent authority has not yet made a formal assessment under statutory procedures. The assessment is a distinct legal act — not merely an internal calculation — that triggers collection authority, lien attachment, and limitations periods. A liability may be known, admitted, or even litigated without being "assessed" in the technical sense. This technical meaning is essential when researching collection due process rights, innocent spouse claims, or bankruptcy discharge questions.

Fourth, penalty and interest treatment often turns on assessed versus unassessed status. Researchers analyzing disputes over back taxes, customs duties, or regulatory fines should determine precisely when assessment occurred, as that date governs many downstream legal rights.

Historical Dictionary Support

Anderson's Dictionary of Law does not contain a direct entry for "unassessed." The entry retrieved in the source material is Anderson's definition of ultra vires, which appears to have been supplied in error. No synthesis from Anderson's on this specific term is therefore possible.

The absence of a dedicated Anderson's entry is itself informative: "unassessed" functioned in 19th-century legal practice primarily as a descriptive modifier in tax statutes, assessment rolls, and property records rather than as a term of art requiring independent definition. Its legal significance was derived from context — the statutes governing particular taxes and assessment procedures — rather than from common-law doctrine. Researchers working in historical sources should therefore look to the enabling tax statutes and local assessment codes of the relevant jurisdiction and period, not to general law dictionaries, to establish the precise legal consequences that attached to unassessed status.

Jurisdictional Note

Assessment procedures and the legal consequences of unassessed status vary significantly by jurisdiction and tax type. In some states, omitted or unassessed property may be retroactively placed on the rolls and subjected to back taxes; in others, the omission extinguishes the taxing authority's claim for the relevant period. Federal tax assessment rules under the Internal Revenue Code are distinct from state property tax regimes and should not be imported into state-law research.

UNASSESSEDmain

Anderson's Dictionary of Law • 1890

An act is ultra vires when (1) it is not in the power of the corporation to perform it under any circumstances; when (2) the corporation cannot perform the act without the consent of certain persons; and when (3) the corporation cannot perform the act for some specific purpose.1 The act, in the first sense, is void in toto, and the corporation may avail itself of that plea. But whether the plea may be set up in other cases depends upon circumstances. When a contract is not on its face necessarily beyond the scope of the power of the corporation, in the absence of proof to the contrary, it will be presumed to be valid. A corporation is presumed to contract within its powers. The doctrine of ultra vires should not be allowed to prevail where it would defeat the ends of justice or work a legal wrong." The House of Lords has decided that a contract not within the scope of the powers conferred on a corporation cannot be made valid by the assent of the shareholders, nor by a partial performance. This decision, which is based upon sound principle, represents the preponderance of authority in this country." Whatever, under the charter of a corporation and the general laws applicable to it, may fairly be regarded as incidental to the objects for which the corporation is created, is not to be taken as prohibited. The doctrine, as applying to the powers of railroad corporations, has not been construed, of late years, with the strictness that obtained in former times. Where a corporation has received the benefits of a contract, it may not now deny its validity. A corporation possesses only such lawful powers as are expressly conferred by its charter, and such as are clearly incidental or impliedly requisite for carrying out the declared objects of its creation. While some authorities hold that an act in excess of the powers so limited are illegal (any contract in excess thereof being non-enforceable), and that neither party is estopped from pleading the ultra vires of the transaction, in some States the corporation is estopped from alleging or taking advantage of its want of power. The latter doctrine seems to be gaining ground. A corporation is liable for every wrong it commits, 1 Miners' Ditch Co. v. Zellerbach, 37 Cal. 578 (1869), Sawyer, C. J. Approved, McPherson v. Foster, 43 Iowa, 65 (1876). * Ohio & Mississippi R. Co. v. McCarthy, 96 U. S. 267 (1877), cases, Swayne, J.; Bissell v. Michigan Southern, &c. R. Cos., 22 N. Y. 263-80 (1860), cases; Bradley v. Ballard, 55 Ill. 419 (1870), cases; Holmes v. City of Shreveport, 31 F. R. 119-21 (1887), cases. • Thomas v. West Jersey R. Co., 101 U. S. 83 (1879), cases. Green Bay, &c. R. Co. v. Union Steamboat Co., 107 U. S. 100 (1882), cases, Gray, J. and in such cases the doctrine of ultra vires has no application. It is also liable for the acts of a servant while engaged in the business of his principal.¹ See TORT, 2. See ASSESS, 1. 1 First Nat. Bank of Carlisle v. Graham, 100 U. S. 702 (1879), cases. See also Cooley, Torts, 119-23, cases. See generally 16 Am. Law Reg. 513-26 (1877), cases; 13 Am. Law Rev. 632-62 (1879), cases. 2 For numpire: F. nom-pair, a non-peer: L. impar, un-equal. [3 Bl. Com. 16. 4 Haven v. Winnisimmet Company, 11 Allen, 334 Whitmore, 75 III. 30 (1874). • Dimpfel v. Ohio & Mississippi R. Co., 9 Biss. 130 (1865), cases, Bigelow, C. J. Approved, Ingrahamu. (1879). Denver Fire Ins. Co. v. McClelland, 9 Col. 18-21 (1885), cases. Board of Foreign Missions v. Ferry, 15 F. R. 700 (1883), cases.

unassessedadj

Wiktionary (English) • 2026

Wiktionary contributors • CC BY-SA 4.0 • via Kaikki
Extracted and formatted for display by Law Mind. Source link opens the current Wiktionary page and its contributor history; it is not a frozen copy of this extract.

Not having been assessed.

Explore the full Law Mind legal research platform.

Subscribe Encyclopedia Sign In