Definition
In civil law, the tritavus is a male ancestor in the sixth degree of direct ascent — specifically, the great-grandfather's great-grandfather. Counting upward from a person: father (1st), grandfather (2nd), great-grandfather (3rd), great-great-grandfather (4th), great-great-great-grandfather (5th), and the tritavus at the sixth remove. The term belongs to the Roman civil law system of naming specific generational positions in a direct line of male ascent, each degree having its own Latin designation.
The corresponding female ancestor at the sixth degree is the tritavia.
---
Common Confusion
The Roman civil law constructed a precise ladder of named ancestors: pater, avus, proavus, abavus, atavus, and tritavus. Researchers occasionally conflate tritavus with atavus (the fifth-degree male ancestor, great-great-great-grandfather), the two being adjacent rungs on the same ladder. The confusion is understandable because both terms are rare in English-language legal sources and neither has a crisp modern English equivalent beyond extended hyphenated constructions. Atavus also gave rise to the English word "atavism," which can mislead researchers into assuming it occupies a different conceptual register than tritavus. Both are strictly genealogical degree-markers within the Roman succession framework.
---
Why It Matters in Research
Tritavus appears almost exclusively in sources touching Roman civil law succession and the law of intestacy. Its practical significance lies in understanding how far the civil law extended intestate inheritance rights along lines of direct ascent and descent, and how courts and commentators working in civil law jurisdictions (or applying civilian influence) calculated degree of relationship for succession purposes.
Researchers working in the Law Mind corpus should note several navigational points:
First, the term is effectively obsolete in modern practice. Contemporary succession statutes do not use classical Latin degree-names; they either enumerate degrees numerically or collapse remote ancestry into catch-all provisions. Finding tritavus in a source is therefore a strong indicator that the text operates within a civilian or historical common law framework drawing on Roman sources.
Second, the degree-counting system underlying tritavus differs between the civil law and the canon law (and, by inheritance, the common law). The civil law counted each generation as one degree; the canon law used a different method for collateral relatives. For direct-line ancestors and descendants, both systems largely agree, but researchers should not assume that "sixth degree" in a canon law or common law source maps cleanly onto tritavus without confirming which counting method applies.
Third, Burrill's citation to Justinian's Institutes (3.6.4) and Fleta (lib. 6, c. 2, § 1) gives researchers the anchor points for primary source verification. Fleta's inclusion signals that the term entered English legal writing through the medieval reception of Roman and civilian learning, not merely through Continental treatise work.
Fourth, when reading historical intestacy materials — particularly from jurisdictions with Spanish, French, or Dutch colonial legal heritage — researchers may encounter the full Latin generational vocabulary in practical succession disputes over land or estate. Knowing where tritavus falls in the sequence is essential to correctly interpreting degree-of-relationship arguments in those sources.
---
Historical Dictionary Support
All three dictionary sources agree on the core definition: tritavus designates the male ancestor in the sixth degree of direct ascent, equivalent to the great-grandfather's great-grandfather. There is no meaningful divergence among them on substance.
Black's (both editions) and Burrill agree in characterizing this as a civil law term. Burrill adds the most value for researchers by supplying the primary source citations — Justinian's Institutes and Fleta — establishing both the Roman origin and its medieval English legal reception. Black's editions are more compressed and omit those citations, which is a characteristic limitation of Black's for terms drawn directly from Roman law.
None of the sources addresses the full symmetrical system of which tritavus is one part, nor do they note the corresponding female form (tritavia) or discuss how courts using civil law principles actually applied these designations in succession calculations. Researchers needing that context should proceed directly to the Institutes and to civilian succession treatises rather than relying on dictionary entries alone.
---
Jurisdictional Note
The term is native to Roman civil law and has no direct counterpart in the common law's ordinary vocabulary of succession. It appears in English legal sources primarily through the influence of civilian learning on early common law commentators and through the legal systems of jurisdictions with a civil law heritage. Modern statutory succession law in all U.S. states and in England has abandoned this nomenclature entirely.
---