TREAL

2 definitions found across Law Mind sources

TREALAuthored
The Law Mind • 432 words
Definition
"Treal" does not appear to be a recognized legal term. The source material attributed to this entry in Rapalje & Lawrence is mismatched — the text provided defines procedures related to summonses in the High Court of Justice, not a term called "treal." No entry for "treal" appears in standard legal dictionaries, historical common law glossaries, or equity practice references. One possibility is a transcription or optical character recognition (OCR) error. Legal terms that visually or orthographically resemble "treal" include: TRIAL — the formal examination of a cause before a competent tribunal, whether by jury or by the court sitting without a jury. TREAL as a standalone term with independent legal meaning is not established in the English or American legal lexicon.
Common Confusion
TREAL / TRIAL — If "treal" appears in a historical source, assume first that it is a rendering of "trial" affected by transcription error. The two are visually similar in certain typefaces and handwritten scripts, particularly where the letters "i" and "e" or the letter-pair "ia" might be compressed or obscured.
Why It Matters in Research
Researchers encountering "treal" in a historical legal document or corpus should treat it as a probable transcription artifact rather than a term of art. OCR errors and manuscript transcription errors in digitized legal sources routinely produce apparent terms that are corruptions of familiar words. "Treal" closely resembles "trial" under conditions of faded ink, compressed typeface, or damaged source material. If you encountered this term in the Law Mind corpus, the recommended approach is to locate the source document and examine the original or a high-resolution image. Cross-reference against "trial" and its historical variants before concluding that an unknown term is present. The source text associated with this entry — describing summonses in the High Court of Justice — belongs to a discussion of English equity or common law procedure, almost certainly misfiled or mislabeled in the corpus index.
Historical Dictionary Support
Rapalje & Lawrence's A Dictionary of American and English Law (1883) does not contain an entry for "treal." The text fragment provided — concerning summonses, chambers applications, enlarging time, discovery, and production of documents — corresponds to standard entries on procedural practice in the English High Court of Justice as reorganized under the Judicature Acts of 1873–1875. This content most naturally belongs under SUMMONS or CHAMBERS (PRACTICE IN). No other historical legal dictionary consulted — including Bouvier, Black's early editions, or Wharton — records "treal" as a term of art.
Related Terms
Trial Summons Chambers (practice) High Court of Justice Discovery
TREALmain
Rapalje & Lawrence • 1883
*(1) High court. In the High Court of Justice, a summons is a mode of making an application to a judge or his deputy in chambers (q. r.) Summonses are, therefore, only used on applications which are either of subsidiary importance or can be conveniently disposed of in chambers, such as applications for enlarging the time to take certain steps, for discovery and production of documents, for appointing examiners and receivers (see generally as to summonses, Rules of Court, liv. (especially the rules of April, 1880); Chit. Gen. Pr. 1598 et seq.; Dan. Ch. Pr. 1050), for leave to sign judgment under Ord. xiv., for the committal of a judgment debtor, &c. In simple cases, the solicitors of the parties attend on their behalf; in difficult or important cases, counsel are instructed. Some of the Chancery judges do not hear counsel in chambers. (2) Queen's Bench. In the Queen's Bench Division some summonses must be heard in the first instance by a a master, and others by a judge, An appeal lies from a master to a judge in chambers, and from the judge to the Divisional Court. Rules of Court, liv. 6, (May, 1880,) lvii. A. (3) Chancery Division. In the Chancery Division every summons is heard in the first instance before the chief or junior clerk, but either party, if dissatisfied with the decision, is entitled to have the summons heard by the judge in chambers. This is called "adjourning the summons to the judge." The judge may also adjourn the summons to be argued in court, or, if he refuses to do so, the dissatisfied party may either move before the judge in court to rescind the order made in chambers, or may appeal to the Court of Appeal. Summonses in the Chancery Division are of two kinds-

Explore the full Law Mind legal research platform.

SubscribeEncyclopediaSign In