Definition
Trassans is a Latin legal term of the law merchant meaning the drawer of a bill of exchange — the party who creates the instrument by directing a second party (the drawee) to pay a specified sum to a third party (the payee). The term functions as both a gerund ("drawing") and a noun ("one who draws"), with the noun sense predominating in legal usage. In modern commercial law, this figure is simply called the drawer.
---
Common Language
This is pure legal jargon with no meaningful common-language counterpart. The term has no usage outside historical commercial and legal contexts. Omitted accordingly.
---
Common Confusion
TRASSANS vs. DRAWEE: These two roles in a bill of exchange are frequently confused in historical sources. The trassans (drawer) originates and issues the instrument; the drawee is the party upon whom the bill is drawn and who is directed to make payment. The drawer commands; the drawee is commanded. Conflating the two misidentifies who bears the initial obligation to the payee and who must accept the instrument to become liable on it.
TRASSANS vs. TRASSATUS: Burrill's entry for trassare (the Latin verb from which trassans derives) leads naturally to the related term trassatus, which refers to the drawee — the party drawn upon. Researchers encountering both terms in the same historical instrument must distinguish them carefully, as trassans is the active party and trassatus is the passive object of the drawing.
---
Why It Matters in Research
Trassans appears almost exclusively in pre-nineteenth-century treatises, civil law commentaries, and early law merchant scholarship written in Latin or heavily Latinized English. It will not appear in modern American or English commercial law materials; Black's Law Dictionary retains it as a historical reference term, not as a term of current practice.
Researchers working in Law Mind's corpus should watch for trassans in materials concerning the lex mercatoria, early negotiable instruments doctrine, and continental exchange law. The citation in Burrill to Heineccius (Johann Gottlieb Heineccius, De Cambiis) points to the civilian scholarly tradition that shaped European exchange law; researchers tracing the intellectual genealogy of bills of exchange doctrine will find trassans a useful search term in that literature.
The term is jurisdiction-specific in a historical sense: it belongs to the transnational law merchant tradition before national codifications of commercial law. Once England's Bills of Exchange Act 1882 and America's Negotiable Instruments Law (later UCC Article 3) standardized the vocabulary of commercial paper, trassans disappeared from operative legal usage entirely.
A practical trap: because trassans is not a common English word, optical character recognition errors in digitized historical texts may render it as "trassans," "trassaus," "trassons," or other variants. Researchers should run multiple spelling searches when working with early printed sources.
---
Historical Dictionary Support
The three source dictionaries are in close agreement. Black's (both editions) defines trassans identically as "Drawing; one who draws. The drawer of a bill of exchange," with minimal elaboration. The two editions differ only in minor orthographic variation ("one" vs. "ane" — likely a typographical artifact in the second edition). Burrill adds the most analytical value by supplying the Latin derivation from trassare, cross-referencing that verb entry, and citing Heineccius, which roots the term in the continental civil law scholarship that underpinned early law merchant doctrine.
None of the three dictionaries provides procedural context — how the trassans's liability arose, what the consequences of dishonor were, or how the term related to the acceptor's obligations. Researchers needing that framework should look beyond dictionary sources to treatises on the law of bills and notes.
---
Jurisdictional Note
Trassans as operative terminology belongs to the transnational law merchant tradition rather than to any single jurisdiction. Modern research into the drawer's obligations under negotiable instruments law should instead consult UCC Article 3 (United States) or the Bills of Exchange Act 1882 (England and Wales), where the party is uniformly called the drawer.
---